Thank you for the authors with this great work. I've wondered why the frequency of the 'climate.csv' is different from one in the paper. In the paper, it mentioned that the frequency in the climate domain is monthly, and the number of datapoint is around 500. However, in this repository, the climate domain data has weekly frequency and the number of datapoint is over 1K.
Why the setting between the paper and this repository differs? Moreover, when I looked the MM-TSFlib repository, It shows the totally different with this repository in the climate domain. Is it recommended to use the data in MM-TSFlib?
Thank you!
Thank you for the authors with this great work. I've wondered why the frequency of the 'climate.csv' is different from one in the paper. In the paper, it mentioned that the frequency in the climate domain is monthly, and the number of datapoint is around 500. However, in this repository, the climate domain data has weekly frequency and the number of datapoint is over 1K.
Why the setting between the paper and this repository differs? Moreover, when I looked the MM-TSFlib repository, It shows the totally different with this repository in the climate domain. Is it recommended to use the data in MM-TSFlib?
Thank you!