S3 facilitator redesign: 73 patterns researched, consent process corrected

[Argocyte]

Tension

The Iskander-Code facilitator implemented a broken version of S3 consent: keyword routing instead of intelligent classification, one-shot consent instead of 9-step process, no objection resolution cycle.

Research

Full analysis of 73 S3 patterns from sociocracy30.org/patterns. Key findings:

The correct consent process has 9 steps, not 1

1. Consent to Driver
2. Present Proposal
3. Clarifying Questions (no debate)
4. Brief Response (ALL members, in round)
5. Check Objections (ALL vote)
6. Test Qualification (harm/improvement vs preference)
7. Resolve (amend → re-vote → recursive)
8. Celebrate
9. Record Concerns

Critical: after resolving ANY objection, return to step 5 and re-check ALL members.

Double-link intake (consented redesign)

Communications (P5, upward link) translates human input → S3 brief + report.
Facilitator (downward link) sends brief to ALL 7 domains.
Each self-selects: ENGAGE or GIVE WAY.
Only engaged domains get full report.
Consent requires ALL 7 to vote.

After consent: agreement + delegation + execution

Proposals include WHO does the work. If ALL domains reject delegation → new domain needed (P1 growth signal).

Periodic governance meetings

Facilitator reviews backlog on schedule: open tensions, due agreements, stalled drivers.

Full plan: Argocyte/Iskander-Persistent-Sociocratic-AI-Architecture

From Iskander-Code, 13 April 2026.