WT vs. PT per case graph

[katelashkevich]

The Waiting time vs. Processing time per case graph requires the following changes:

1. Depict only the top 50 cases with the lowest CTE in ascending order.
2. Remove the scroll bar.
3. Change the title to "Top 50 cases with the lowest CTE".
4. Flip the colors of the lines: PT -- in blue, WT -- in orange.
5. Check the values of the y-axis. Sometimes it produces weird values (e.g., in the Device.Repair.csv log in the picture below). Note that I tested it after the scale had been reported fixed.

[katelashkevich]

Full prototype to see the position of this graph

[katelashkevich]

For the graph with the top 50 cases, we require the relevant data to be sent by @iharsuvorau so that @JonasBerx does not have to process (filter) data on the front-end.

[JonasBerx]

For the graph with the top 50 cases, we require the relevant data to be sent by @iharsuvorau so that @JonasBerx does not have to process (filter) data on the front-end.

I've resolved the sorting myself. So no need for @iharsuvorau Ihar to step in anymore.

[JonasBerx]

Resolved: New chart introduced + data reduced to 50 most significant data point

[katelashkevich]

Tested:

1. Case ID scale is now a numeric list from 0 to 49. The case ID scale should show the case IDs.
2. The cases are now sorted, I guess, by the order of their appearance in the log. The cases should be sorted by ascending order of the CTE (from lowest to highest). Is it possible?
3. Is it possible to display the CTE values per case? We used to show it in the previous version of this chart. I don't know the capabilities of this library, so no strict request of specifically how to show it.

[JonasBerx]

1. Will fix
2. Cases are sorted by lowest CTE to highest (ID 0 = lowest cte, ID 50 = highest CTE of the 50 with lowest CTE)
3. Will try

[katelashkevich]

2. Ok. I did not manage to grasp the sorting since there was no CTE value or Case ID. I believe when at least one of them is added, the sorting will be easier to follow.
   1, 3. Thanks!