WP Codebox provides a generic benchmark substrate for disposable WordPress runtimes. It owns workload execution, normalized metric envelopes, runtime evidence, and artifact extraction helpers. Callers own product semantics such as scenario catalogs, scoring, grading, model comparison, reward policy, retry policy, and reports.
caller benchmark suite
-> writes a WP Codebox recipe
-> runs recipe-run in an isolated WordPress runtime
-> receives recipe output plus artifact bundle
-> extracts generic benchmark results
-> applies caller-owned scoring/reporting outside WP Codebox
- Execute declared recipe steps in a disposable WordPress runtime.
- Register generic benchmark commands such as
wordpress.bench. - Capture runtime artifacts, command logs, browser evidence, and provenance.
- Emit
benchResultsandbenchResultsListinwp-codebox/recipe-run/v1JSON output whenwordpress.benchsteps succeed. - Provide CLI helpers that extract benchmark envelopes from saved
recipe-runoutput or artifact bundles. - Provide CLI/API helpers that compare compatible baseline/candidate benchmark envelopes and emit generic deltas plus diagnostics.
- Keep helper output stable, JSON-friendly, and free of product-specific scoring fields.
- Define the suite, scenario ids, task taxonomy, expected behavior, and run matrix.
- Decide which metrics matter and how to compare them.
- Score, grade, rank, retry, regress, or publish benchmark reports.
- Store durable benchmark history and model/product metadata.
- Interpret browser metrics or runtime artifacts in a product-specific context.
wordpress.bench currently supports plugin workloads discovered from
tests/bench/*.php plus explicit workloads-json entries. Workloads can run PHP
code and, through configured workload steps, WP-CLI commands. Each workload
returns numeric metrics directly or an object with metrics and metadata.
The command contract is intentionally broad enough for future workload types:
- PHP: direct workload callables and inline configured workload steps.
- WP-CLI: configured workload steps that execute in the same sandbox.
- Ability: future ability-backed workload steps should still return generic numeric metrics and metadata.
- REST: configured
rest-requeststeps callrest_do_request()in-process. A configured workload may declareroute_matrixas a compact list of REST routes; WP Codebox expands each route into the existingrest-requeststep type. - Database inventory: configured
db-inventorysteps collect table, row, column, index, and byte-count inventory through the benchmark artifact path. - Browser:
wordpress.browser-probecaptures generic browser performance and memory artifacts. When a recipe runs browser probes beforewordpress.bench, selected numericbrowser_*metrics are promoted into each benchmark scenario while raw browser artifacts remain in the bundle.
WP Codebox does not currently expose a REST DB query profiler workload step. Full
REST query profiling needs an upstream runtime hook that brackets each
rest_do_request() call, captures $wpdb->queries or an equivalent query log for
that request only, and emits a bounded artifact with query count, total query
time, repeated-query summaries, and redacted SQL fingerprints. Until that hook
exists, caller rigs should use real rest_request_cases and db-inventory
workloads separately and leave rest-db-query-profiler as a documented missing
primitive rather than emitting synthetic query-profile artifacts.
Route-matrix workloads are for API profiling suites that want one benchmark
scenario to cover a bounded set of REST routes without writing PHP glue. Each
entry maps directly to a rest-request workload step and supports method,
path or route, params, headers, body, body-json, capture-response,
metric-prefix, and metadata. When metric-prefix is omitted and id is
present, WP Codebox derives a rest_<id> prefix and then applies the normal
metric-prefix sanitization.
capture-response captures response metadata for benchmark evidence. WP Codebox
records the UTF-8 byte length and a bounded JSON shape summary rather than the
response body.
{
"id": "rest-catalog",
"source": "config",
"route_matrix": [
{
"id": "items-list",
"method": "GET",
"path": "/example/v1/items",
"params": { "per_page": 10 },
"capture-response": true
},
{
"id": "item-detail",
"method": "GET",
"route": "/example/v1/items/123"
}
],
"artifacts": {
"route-summary": {
"path": "bench/rest-route-summary.json",
"kind": "json",
"source": "scenario-artifact"
}
}
}The route-matrix contract is generic: callers decide which routes represent a product suite, how fixtures are installed, whether captured responses are safe to persist, and how route-level metrics are scored. WP Codebox only executes the requests, records numeric timing/status metrics, carries declared scenario artifacts, and exposes the results through the normal benchmark summary and artifact extraction commands.
When artifact collection is enabled, WP Codebox also materializes a bounded
scenario artifact for route-matrix workloads at
files/bench/<component-id>/<scenario-id>-route-matrix-summary.json. The artifact
uses wp-codebox/benchmark-route-matrix-summary/v1 and records one entry per
route step with generic fields: route index/id, method, path/route,
status, duration, and a redacted response summary. Captured response bodies are
not persisted in this artifact; they are replaced with UTF-8 byte counts and a
bounded JSON shape summary. The scenario receives a typed
benchmark-route-matrix-summary artifact reference named route-matrix-summary.
The benchmark envelope is a JSON object with generic fields:
{
"component_id": "bench-plugin",
"iterations": 3,
"warmup_iterations": 1,
"scenarios": [
{
"id": "noop",
"source": "file",
"iterations": 3,
"metrics": {
"duration_ms_mean": 1.23,
"peak_memory_bytes_mean": 123456
},
"metadata": {},
"artifacts": {}
}
]
}Metrics are numeric and named by the workload/runtime surface. WP Codebox records them; it does not decide whether a value is good, bad, passing, failing, or regressed.
Use a recipe workflow step with wordpress.bench:
npm run wp-codebox -- recipe-run \
--recipe ./examples/recipes/bench-plugin.json \
--artifacts ./artifacts/bench-plugin \
--json > ./artifacts/bench-plugin/recipe-run.jsonThe recipe-run JSON output includes benchResults when exactly one successful
wordpress.bench step ran, and benchResultsList when one or more benchmark
steps ran.
Summarize saved recipe-run JSON:
npm run wp-codebox -- bench summarize \
--input ./artifacts/bench-plugin/recipe-run.json \
--jsonSummarize an artifact bundle by reading its command log:
npm run wp-codebox -- artifacts bench-results \
--bundle ./artifacts/bench-plugin \
--jsonBoth commands emit wp-codebox/benchmark-summary/v1 with the raw benchmark
envelopes plus a flattened scenario summary for automation:
{
"schema": "wp-codebox/benchmark-summary/v1",
"source": { "type": "recipe-run-output", "path": "/abs/recipe-run.json" },
"hasBenchResults": true,
"benchmarkCount": 1,
"scenarioCount": 1,
"benchmarks": [],
"scenarios": [
{
"componentId": "bench-plugin",
"id": "noop",
"source": "file",
"iterations": 3,
"metricCount": 2,
"metrics": {},
"artifacts": {}
}
]
}Omit --json for a compact human-readable table. The human form is for quick
inspection; automation should consume the JSON envelope.
bench matrix runs the same benchmark recipe across an opaque cartesian product
of mechanical dimensions. Dimensions are generic; callers decide whether they
represent WordPress versions, environment maps, blueprint fragments, seeds,
mounts, viewport settings, cache modes, or other runtime knobs.
npm run wp-codebox -- bench matrix \
--matrix ./benchmarks/matrix.json \
--json > ./artifacts/benchmark-matrix.jsonMatrix definitions point at a base recipe and declare dimension values. When a
value includes value.recipe, WP Codebox deep-merges that partial recipe into
the base recipe for the generated cell recipe. Arrays are replaced, not merged.
{
"schema": "wp-codebox/benchmark-recipe-matrix/v1",
"recipe": "./bench-plugin.recipe.json",
"artifacts": { "directory": "./artifacts/bench-plugin-matrix" },
"dimensions": [
{
"id": "wp",
"values": [
{ "id": "6.9", "value": { "recipe": { "runtime": { "wp": "6.9" } } } },
{ "id": "7.0", "value": { "recipe": { "runtime": { "wp": "7.0" } } } }
]
},
{
"id": "cache",
"values": [
{ "id": "cold", "provenance": { "cache": "cold" } },
{ "id": "warm", "provenance": { "cache": "warm" } }
]
}
]
}Each cell gets its own generated recipe, recipe-run.json, and artifact bundle
directory. The JSON output uses wp-codebox/benchmark-matrix-run/v1 and groups
benchmark envelopes by cell:
{
"schema": "wp-codebox/benchmark-matrix-run/v1",
"matrix": { "schema": "wp-codebox/benchmark-matrix/v1", "cells": [], "diagnostics": [] },
"cells": [],
"benchResults": [
{ "cellId": "wp:6.9__cache:cold", "cell": {}, "results": [] }
],
"diagnostics": []
}Failed cells remain isolated as cell-failed diagnostics. A failed cell does not
prevent later cells from running, and WP Codebox still does not score, grade,
rank, retry, or publish benchmark results.
Compare two saved recipe-run JSON outputs:
npm run wp-codebox -- bench compare \
--baseline ./artifacts/baseline/recipe-run.json \
--candidate ./artifacts/candidate/recipe-run.json \
--jsonCompare two artifact bundles by reading each bundle's command log:
npm run wp-codebox -- artifacts bench-compare \
--baseline-bundle ./artifacts/baseline \
--candidate-bundle ./artifacts/candidate \
--jsonBoth commands emit wp-codebox/benchmark-comparison/v1. The comparison surface
is mechanical: it matches scenario ids and metric ids, compares numeric values or
samples.mean from metric records, emits absolute and percent deltas, carries
sample counts and stability metadata, and reports missing scenarios or metrics as
diagnostics. It does not decide whether a delta is a regression, improvement,
pass, or failure.
When a source contains multiple benchmark envelopes, select an envelope with
--baseline-index or --candidate-index.
WP Codebox benchmark helpers do not define or store:
- Product benchmark suites.
- Rewards or graders.
- Pass/fail scoring policies.
- Model-eval metadata.
- Competitor comparisons.
- Historical regression decisions.
- Publishing or PR/report workflows.
Those belong to callers such as eval harnesses, product hosts, or CI systems that project WP Codebox evidence into their own product schemas.