You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<h2itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to calculate the area of a circle.</h2>
100
100
<br>
101
-
<section><h2style="margin:12px">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square.</h2>
102
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">Because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.
101
+
<section><h2itemrel="description" style="margin:12px">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square.</h2>
102
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">Because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.
103
103
<br>
104
104
The only problem with that was that the circle is not square. I have figured that the circle can be cut into four and then I get four right angles that can be aligned with the vertices of a square.
105
105
<br>
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to
118
118
<br>
119
119
Then I worked out the relationship between the radius and the side of the square algebraically via the Pythagorean theorem.
@@ -128,7 +129,8 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to
128
129
</p>
129
130
</div>
130
131
<br>
131
-
<pstyle="margin:12px" itemrel="description">That got me excited for obvious reasons, but also confused. Nobody thought of that before? Why is the pi so different?
132
+
<sectionitemrel="description">
133
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">That got me excited for obvious reasons, but also confused. Nobody thought of that before? Why is the pi so different?
132
134
<br>
133
135
For about a year I just kept thinking and calculating all aspects of that, and I shared my discovery just with a few friends. They didn't share my excitement.
134
136
<br>
@@ -137,13 +139,14 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to
137
139
</section>
138
140
<br>
139
141
<br>
140
-
<section>
141
-
<h2style="margin:12px"itemrel="about">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
142
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × pi × r³ ".
142
+
<sectionitemrel="description">
143
+
<h2style="margin:12px">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
144
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × pi × r³ ".
143
145
<br>
144
146
<br>
145
-
I conducted some experiments with the resources that I had.
147
+
I conducted some experiments with the resources that I had. I could not provide the accuracy that the subject deserves, but the results aligned better with my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula.
@@ -162,9 +165,6 @@ <h2 style="margin:12px" itemrel="about">Meanwhile I figured that by extending th
162
165
<pstyle="margin:12px" itemrel="description">The second sphere experiment was done with the same ball and a nominal 5 ml syringe. The nominal volume of a syringe should be its real volume. However, I have measured its length and width to make sure and I found that its real volume is about 10% larger. I took that into account in the calculations.
163
166
</p>
164
167
</div>
165
-
<pstyle="margin:12px" itemrel="description">I could not provide the accuracy that the subject deserves, but the results aligned better with my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula.
166
-
</p>
167
-
</section>
168
168
<br>
169
169
<br>
170
170
<section>
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@ <h2 itemrel="about" style="margin:12px">I have derived the volume of a cone by c
174
174
</section>
175
175
<br>
176
176
<br>
177
-
<section>
178
-
<h2itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
179
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">I thought it was time to share my discoveries online, so I went to the local public library to publish them on a webpage. My volume formula for a cone and a pyramid was undeveloped and I didn't have much web development skills but I had to start somewhere. My attention was divided by lots of details in both geometry and IT.
177
+
<sectionitemrel="description">
178
+
<h2style="margin:12px">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
179
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">I thought it was time to share my discoveries online, so I went to the local public library to publish them on a webpage. My volume formula for a cone and a pyramid was undeveloped and I didn't have much web development skills but I had to start somewhere. My attention was divided by lots of details in both geometry and IT.
180
180
<br>
181
181
<br>
182
182
I received some criticism regarding my formulas. Those included the lack of rigorous proof, and the alleged rigorous proofs of the conventional formulas.
@@ -205,22 +205,22 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">In early 2020 there were news about tha
205
205
They call that Euclidean geometry. I primarily regard my framework as a fix of the conventional one.
206
206
<br>
207
207
It's quite similar to the Euclidean, but apparently the key differences are that I don't define the point is as zero-dimensional and a line can have a thickness. These two make a big difference, especially in case of 3 dimensional solids.
208
-
<br>
209
-
<br>
210
-
Exactly determining the properties of different shapes is in the scope, which is not really about if it is Euclidean or not. But since that is associated with the zero-dimensional point and Archimedes' flawed formulas, I figured that it's the best to start with a clear sheet.
<iframetitle="Introduction to basic geometry" width="420" height="315" src="https://youtube.com/embed/U5eHkmmVVEA">
216
215
</iframe>
216
+
<br>
217
+
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">Exactly determining the properties of different shapes is in the scope, which is not really about if it is Euclidean or not. But since that is associated with the zero-dimensional point and Archimedes' flawed formulas, I figured that it's the best to start with a clear sheet.</p>
217
218
</div>
218
-
</section>
219
219
<br>
220
220
<br>
221
-
<section>
222
-
<h2itemrel="about" style="margin:12px">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
223
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">The name reflects that my logic is built in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics. That is something that people assume of the conventional one and they have no idea how badly it deviated from that.
221
+
<sectionitemrel="description">
222
+
<h2style="margin:12px">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
223
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">The name reflects that my logic is built in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics. That is something that people assume of the conventional one and they have no idea how badly it deviated from that.
224
224
<br>
225
225
<br>
226
226
The expression was unique back then. I came up with it. I never read it anywhere else before. Back then I searched for it to find out if anyone else is using it, and there were no results for that term.
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@ <h2 itemrel="about" style="margin:12px">I named my framework the Core Geometric
231
231
</section>
232
232
<br>
233
233
<br>
234
-
<section>
235
-
<h2itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
236
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">I'm sorry about that I had presented a wrong number for such a long time, but at least my logic was closer to reality.
234
+
<sectionitemrel="description">
235
+
<h2style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
236
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">I'm sorry about that I had presented a wrong number for such a long time, but at least my logic was closer to reality.
237
237
<br>
238
238
<br>
239
239
Later that year I got access to AI language models.
@@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for m
252
252
</section>
253
253
<br>
254
254
<br>
255
-
<section>
256
-
<h2itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
257
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">I thought I can't just start the explanation with the numbers and basic operations.
255
+
<sectionitemrel="description">
256
+
<h2style="margin:12px">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
257
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">I thought I can't just start the explanation with the numbers and basic operations.
258
258
<br>
259
259
Then I realized that I can.
260
260
<br>
@@ -297,10 +297,10 @@ <h4 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">® All rights reserved</h4>
0 commit comments