Update about.html

Text

Author: Gmac4247

about.html

@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 <link rel="icon" type="image/png" sizes="32x32" href="favicon-32x32.png">
 <link rel="icon" type="image/png" sizes="16x16" href="favicon-16x16.png">
 <link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="favicon.ico">
-<link rel="manifest" href="manifest.json">
 <link rel="mask-icon" href="safari-pinned-tab.svg" color="#000000">
 <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=OpenDyslexic&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
 <style>
@@ -155,7 +154,7 @@
 },
 "dateCreated": "2024-08-31",
 "datePublished": "2024-08-31",
-"dateModified": "2025-11-20",
+"dateModified": "2025-11-24",
 "description": "About the context of the Core Geometric System ™, the best-established and most accurate framework to calculate area and volume.",
 "disambiguatingDescription": "Introducing exact, empirically grounded and logically consistent formulas over the flawed conventional approximations.",
 "headline": "Introducing the Core Geometric System ™",
@@ -285,7 +284,7 @@ <h2 style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to calculate the ar
 <br>
 <section>
 <h2 style="margin:12px">
-Meanwhile I got curious about the properties of other shapes, and I figured that the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
+Meanwhile I got curious about the properties of other shapes, and I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
 <p style="margin:12px">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × π × r³ ". 
 <br>
 <br>
@@ -393,7 +392,7 @@ <h2 style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyrami
 <br>
 They also helped to disprove the conventional formulas by summarizing their key points.
 <br>
-It wasn't easy because they acted just like the academic wise guys protecting their diplomas. They kept calling the conventional stuff well-established and rigorously proven, and mine as a deviation. 
+It wasn't easy because they acted just like the academic wise guys defending their diplomas, insisting that the conventional formulas are well-established and rigorously proven, and they called mine as deviations. 
 <br>
 It was very disturbing. But I was able to spot their recurring arguments. And I questioned them until they revealed all the inconsistent details they were trying to hide. 
 <br>