Update about.html

Rephrasing

Author: Gmac4247

about.html

@@ -345,15 +345,21 @@ <h1 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px;">How Accurate Are The Conventional Geometr
 <br>
 <br>
 The same coefficient was used to calculate the ratio between the area and the squared radius of a circle.
+<br>
+<br>
 Despite these early advances, a precise, universally accepted value of this constant remained elusive for centuries. 
 <br>
 <br>
 Being uncertain about its numeric value and how to calculate it, it was comfortable to denote it by a sign in the equations.
+<br>
+<br>
 It was not until the 18th century that the symbol π, popularized by the mathematicians of the time, gained widespread acceptance.
 <br>
 <br>
 Several complex formulas were introduced by different mathematicians, aimed at more accurately estimating this ratio, based on a theoretical polygon with an infinite number of sides. 
-All of the comparison methods mentioned above have one thing in common. They are estimating the perimeters of polygons and do not account for the curved shape of the circle.
+<br>
+<br>
+All of the above mentioned approximation methods have one thing in common. They are estimating the perimeters of polygons and do not account for the curved shape of the circle.
 <br>
 <br>
 By focusing on area relationships and direct comparisons between shapes, the following method emphasizes a more intuitive and potentially more fundamental understanding of geometric concepts.<br>