Hello, thank you for your great work!
I have encountered some trouble when trying to reproduce your code. I can't reach the accuracy you reported in the paper. I used the the optimal parameters (layer=30 and C=1.0) you mentioned in the article to run the DINOv2 model on the depth task, but the accuracy I obtained is 87%, not 99%.
This is how I extract the DINOv2 features:
Also, I visualized the region masks I generated using the NYUv2 toolbox and didn’t find any issues. The region IDs are also consistent with the region pairs file you provided.
So is there something I have done improperly?
Thank you.
Hello, thank you for your great work!
I have encountered some trouble when trying to reproduce your code. I can't reach the accuracy you reported in the paper. I used the the optimal parameters (layer=30 and C=1.0) you mentioned in the article to run the DINOv2 model on the depth task, but the accuracy I obtained is 87%, not 99%.
This is how I extract the DINOv2 features:
Also, I visualized the region masks I generated using the NYUv2 toolbox and didn’t find any issues. The region IDs are also consistent with the region pairs file you provided.
So is there something I have done improperly?
Thank you.