Skip to content

Commit df76701

Browse files
Copilotintel352
andcommitted
Implement Contract/Feature Tests (T002-T022) for Dynamic Reload & Health Aggregation Features
Co-authored-by: intel352 <77607+intel352@users.noreply.github.com>
1 parent e9a8b13 commit df76701

16 files changed

Lines changed: 361 additions & 358 deletions

internal/decorator/decorator_order_tiebreak_test.go

Lines changed: 25 additions & 25 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import (
1111
// This test should fail initially as the enhanced decorator system doesn't exist yet.
1212
func TestDecoratorOrderingAndTiebreak(t *testing.T) {
1313
// RED test: This tests decorator ordering contracts that don't exist yet
14-
14+
1515
t.Run("decorators should have priority metadata", func(t *testing.T) {
1616
// Expected: A Decorator interface should support priority
1717
var decorator interface {
@@ -20,33 +20,33 @@ func TestDecoratorOrderingAndTiebreak(t *testing.T) {
2020
GetRegistrationOrder() int
2121
Decorate(target interface{}) interface{}
2222
}
23-
23+
2424
// This will fail because we don't have the enhanced interface yet
2525
assert.NotNil(t, decorator, "Decorator with priority should be defined")
26-
26+
2727
// Expected behavior: decorators should be orderable by priority
2828
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator priority metadata not implemented - this test should pass once T033 is implemented")
2929
})
30-
30+
3131
t.Run("higher priority decorators should be applied first", func(t *testing.T) {
3232
// Expected: A DecoratorChain should exist that orders by priority
3333
var chain interface {
3434
AddDecorator(decorator interface{}, priority int) error
3535
ApplyDecorators(target interface{}) interface{}
3636
GetOrderedDecorators() []interface{}
3737
}
38-
38+
3939
assert.NotNil(t, chain, "DecoratorChain interface should be defined")
40-
40+
4141
// Expected behavior: priority 100 should be applied before priority 50
4242
assert.Fail(t, "Priority-based decorator ordering not implemented")
4343
})
44-
44+
4545
t.Run("registration order should break ties", func(t *testing.T) {
4646
// Expected: when priorities are equal, registration order determines application order
4747
assert.Fail(t, "Registration order tie-breaking not implemented")
4848
})
49-
49+
5050
t.Run("should support explicit ordering hints", func(t *testing.T) {
5151
// Expected: decorators should be able to specify ordering relative to others
5252
assert.Fail(t, "Explicit ordering hints not implemented")
@@ -59,24 +59,24 @@ func TestDecoratorTiebreakStrategies(t *testing.T) {
5959
// Expected: decorator names should be usable for deterministic ordering
6060
assert.Fail(t, "Name-based tie-breaking not implemented")
6161
})
62-
62+
6363
t.Run("should support explicit before/after relationships", func(t *testing.T) {
6464
// Expected: decorators should be able to specify dependencies
6565
var decorator interface {
6666
GetBefore() []string
6767
GetAfter() []string
6868
GetName() string
6969
}
70-
70+
7171
assert.NotNil(t, decorator, "Decorator with ordering relationships should be defined")
7272
assert.Fail(t, "Before/after relationship tie-breaking not implemented")
7373
})
74-
74+
7575
t.Run("should detect circular dependencies in ordering", func(t *testing.T) {
7676
// Expected: should detect and reject circular before/after relationships
7777
assert.Fail(t, "Circular dependency detection not implemented")
7878
})
79-
79+
8080
t.Run("should support configurable tie-break strategy", func(t *testing.T) {
8181
// Expected: tie-break strategy should be configurable (name, registration order, etc.)
8282
assert.Fail(t, "Configurable tie-break strategy not implemented")
@@ -89,24 +89,24 @@ func TestDecoratorChainValidation(t *testing.T) {
8989
// Expected: should check that decorators are compatible with target type
9090
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator compatibility validation not implemented")
9191
})
92-
92+
9393
t.Run("should validate ordering constraints", func(t *testing.T) {
9494
// Expected: should validate that all ordering constraints can be satisfied
9595
assert.Fail(t, "Ordering constraint validation not implemented")
9696
})
97-
97+
9898
t.Run("should detect conflicting decorators", func(t *testing.T) {
9999
// Expected: should detect when decorators conflict with each other
100100
assert.Fail(t, "Conflicting decorator detection not implemented")
101101
})
102-
102+
103103
t.Run("should provide ordering diagnostic information", func(t *testing.T) {
104104
// Expected: should explain how decorators were ordered
105105
var diagnostics interface {
106106
ExplainOrdering(target interface{}) ([]string, error)
107107
GetOrderingRationale() ([]interface{}, error)
108108
}
109-
109+
110110
assert.NotNil(t, diagnostics, "DecoratorOrderingDiagnostics should be defined")
111111
assert.Fail(t, "Ordering diagnostic information not implemented")
112112
})
@@ -118,17 +118,17 @@ func TestDecoratorMetadata(t *testing.T) {
118118
// Expected: should track the actual order decorators were applied
119119
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator application order tracking not implemented")
120120
})
121-
121+
122122
t.Run("should support decorator tags and categories", func(t *testing.T) {
123123
// Expected: decorators should support categorization for filtering
124124
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator tags and categories not implemented")
125125
})
126-
126+
127127
t.Run("should track decorator performance impact", func(t *testing.T) {
128128
// Expected: should measure time/memory impact of each decorator
129129
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator performance tracking not implemented")
130130
})
131-
131+
132132
t.Run("should support conditional decorator application", func(t *testing.T) {
133133
// Expected: decorators should be applicable based on conditions
134134
assert.Fail(t, "Conditional decorator application not implemented")
@@ -141,17 +141,17 @@ func TestDecoratorChainOptimization(t *testing.T) {
141141
// Expected: should remove or merge duplicate decorators
142142
assert.Fail(t, "Duplicate decorator optimization not implemented")
143143
})
144-
144+
145145
t.Run("should support decorator chain caching", func(t *testing.T) {
146146
// Expected: should cache decorator chains for repeated use
147147
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator chain caching not implemented")
148148
})
149-
149+
150150
t.Run("should optimize no-op decorator chains", func(t *testing.T) {
151151
// Expected: should optimize away chains that don't modify the target
152152
assert.Fail(t, "No-op decorator chain optimization not implemented")
153153
})
154-
154+
155155
t.Run("should support lazy decorator application", func(t *testing.T) {
156156
// Expected: should support applying decorators only when needed
157157
assert.Fail(t, "Lazy decorator application not implemented")
@@ -164,14 +164,14 @@ func TestDecoratorEvents(t *testing.T) {
164164
// Expected: should emit DecoratorApplied events
165165
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator application events not implemented")
166166
})
167-
167+
168168
t.Run("should emit events when chains are optimized", func(t *testing.T) {
169169
// Expected: should emit DecoratorChainOptimized events
170170
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator optimization events not implemented")
171171
})
172-
172+
173173
t.Run("should emit events on ordering conflicts", func(t *testing.T) {
174174
// Expected: should emit DecoratorOrderingConflict events
175175
assert.Fail(t, "Decorator conflict events not implemented")
176176
})
177-
}
177+
}

internal/errors/error_taxonomy_classification_test.go

Lines changed: 33 additions & 33 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import (
1212
// This test should fail initially as the error taxonomy system doesn't exist yet.
1313
func TestErrorTaxonomyClassification(t *testing.T) {
1414
// RED test: This tests error taxonomy contracts that don't exist yet
15-
15+
1616
t.Run("error taxonomy categories should be defined", func(t *testing.T) {
1717
// Expected: An ErrorCategory enum should exist
1818
type ErrorCategory int
@@ -29,15 +29,15 @@ func TestErrorTaxonomyClassification(t *testing.T) {
2929
ErrorCategoryConcurrency
3030
ErrorCategoryCompatibility
3131
)
32-
32+
3333
// This will fail because we don't have the enum yet
3434
var category ErrorCategory
3535
assert.Equal(t, ErrorCategory(0), category, "ErrorCategory enum should be defined")
36-
36+
3737
// Expected behavior: errors should be classifiable by category
3838
assert.Fail(t, "Error taxonomy classification not implemented - this test should pass once T038 is implemented")
3939
})
40-
40+
4141
t.Run("should classify configuration errors", func(t *testing.T) {
4242
// Expected: A TaxonomyClassifier should exist
4343
var classifier interface {
@@ -46,18 +46,18 @@ func TestErrorTaxonomyClassification(t *testing.T) {
4646
GetErrorSeverity(err error) interface{}
4747
IsRetryable(err error) bool
4848
}
49-
49+
5050
assert.NotNil(t, classifier, "TaxonomyClassifier interface should be defined")
51-
51+
5252
// Expected behavior: configuration errors should be classified correctly
5353
assert.Fail(t, "Configuration error classification not implemented")
5454
})
55-
55+
5656
t.Run("should classify network errors", func(t *testing.T) {
5757
// Expected: network-related errors should be classified appropriately
5858
assert.Fail(t, "Network error classification not implemented")
5959
})
60-
60+
6161
t.Run("should classify authentication/authorization errors", func(t *testing.T) {
6262
// Expected: auth errors should be distinguished and classified
6363
assert.Fail(t, "Authentication/authorization error classification not implemented")
@@ -77,20 +77,20 @@ func TestErrorSeverityLevels(t *testing.T) {
7777
ErrorSeverityCritical
7878
ErrorSeverityFatal
7979
)
80-
80+
8181
assert.Fail(t, "ErrorSeverity enum not implemented")
8282
})
83-
83+
8484
t.Run("should assign appropriate severity to errors", func(t *testing.T) {
8585
// Expected: errors should be assigned severity based on impact
8686
assert.Fail(t, "Error severity assignment not implemented")
8787
})
88-
88+
8989
t.Run("should support severity escalation rules", func(t *testing.T) {
9090
// Expected: repeated errors might escalate in severity
9191
assert.Fail(t, "Severity escalation rules not implemented")
9292
})
93-
93+
9494
t.Run("should consider context in severity assignment", func(t *testing.T) {
9595
// Expected: same error might have different severity in different contexts
9696
assert.Fail(t, "Context-aware severity assignment not implemented")
@@ -103,17 +103,17 @@ func TestErrorRetryability(t *testing.T) {
103103
// Expected: some errors should be marked as retryable
104104
retryableErrors := []string{
105105
"network timeout",
106-
"temporary resource unavailable",
106+
"temporary resource unavailable",
107107
"rate limit exceeded",
108108
"service temporarily unavailable",
109109
}
110-
110+
111111
// These error types should be classified as retryable
112112
// (placeholder check to avoid unused variable)
113113
assert.True(t, len(retryableErrors) > 0, "Should have retryable error examples")
114114
assert.Fail(t, "Retryable error identification not implemented")
115115
})
116-
116+
117117
t.Run("should identify non-retryable errors", func(t *testing.T) {
118118
// Expected: some errors should be marked as non-retryable
119119
nonRetryableErrors := []string{
@@ -122,18 +122,18 @@ func TestErrorRetryability(t *testing.T) {
122122
"authorization denied",
123123
"malformed request",
124124
}
125-
125+
126126
// These error types should be classified as non-retryable
127127
// (placeholder check to avoid unused variable)
128128
assert.True(t, len(nonRetryableErrors) > 0, "Should have non-retryable error examples")
129129
assert.Fail(t, "Non-retryable error identification not implemented")
130130
})
131-
131+
132132
t.Run("should support retry strategy hints", func(t *testing.T) {
133133
// Expected: retryable errors should include retry strategy hints
134134
assert.Fail(t, "Retry strategy hints not implemented")
135135
})
136-
136+
137137
t.Run("should consider retry count in retryability", func(t *testing.T) {
138138
// Expected: errors might become non-retryable after multiple attempts
139139
assert.Fail(t, "Retry count consideration not implemented")
@@ -149,21 +149,21 @@ func TestErrorContextualization(t *testing.T) {
149149
GetErrorContext(err error) (map[string]interface{}, error)
150150
AddTraceInfo(err error, trace interface{}) error
151151
}
152-
152+
153153
assert.NotNil(t, enricher, "ErrorEnricher interface should be defined")
154154
assert.Fail(t, "Error context enrichment not implemented")
155155
})
156-
156+
157157
t.Run("should include tenant information in error context", func(t *testing.T) {
158158
// Expected: errors should include tenant context when relevant
159159
assert.Fail(t, "Tenant context in errors not implemented")
160160
})
161-
161+
162162
t.Run("should include request/operation context", func(t *testing.T) {
163163
// Expected: errors should include operation context
164164
assert.Fail(t, "Operation context in errors not implemented")
165165
})
166-
166+
167167
t.Run("should support error correlation IDs", func(t *testing.T) {
168168
// Expected: errors should support correlation for tracking
169169
assert.Fail(t, "Error correlation IDs not implemented")
@@ -176,17 +176,17 @@ func TestErrorReporting(t *testing.T) {
176176
// Expected: errors should be reportable in structured format
177177
assert.Fail(t, "Structured error reporting not implemented")
178178
})
179-
179+
180180
t.Run("should support error aggregation", func(t *testing.T) {
181181
// Expected: similar errors should be aggregated to avoid spam
182182
assert.Fail(t, "Error aggregation not implemented")
183183
})
184-
184+
185185
t.Run("should support error rate limiting", func(t *testing.T) {
186186
// Expected: error reporting should be rate limited
187187
assert.Fail(t, "Error rate limiting not implemented")
188188
})
189-
189+
190190
t.Run("should trigger alerts based on error patterns", func(t *testing.T) {
191191
// Expected: certain error patterns should trigger alerts
192192
assert.Fail(t, "Error pattern alerting not implemented")
@@ -199,23 +199,23 @@ func TestErrorChaining(t *testing.T) {
199199
// Expected: should maintain error causality chains
200200
baseErr := errors.New("base error")
201201
wrappedErr := errors.New("wrapped error")
202-
202+
203203
// Error chains should be preserved and analyzable
204204
assert.NotNil(t, baseErr)
205205
assert.NotNil(t, wrappedErr)
206206
assert.Fail(t, "Error chain preservation not implemented")
207207
})
208-
208+
209209
t.Run("should classify entire error chains", func(t *testing.T) {
210210
// Expected: entire error chains should be classifiable
211211
assert.Fail(t, "Error chain classification not implemented")
212212
})
213-
213+
214214
t.Run("should identify root causes", func(t *testing.T) {
215215
// Expected: should identify root cause in error chains
216216
assert.Fail(t, "Root cause identification not implemented")
217217
})
218-
218+
219219
t.Run("should support error unwrapping", func(t *testing.T) {
220220
// Expected: should support Go 1.13+ error unwrapping
221221
assert.Fail(t, "Error unwrapping support not implemented")
@@ -228,19 +228,19 @@ func TestErrorMetrics(t *testing.T) {
228228
// Expected: should track error counts by category
229229
assert.Fail(t, "Error classification metrics not implemented")
230230
})
231-
231+
232232
t.Run("should emit error severity metrics", func(t *testing.T) {
233233
// Expected: should track error counts by severity
234234
assert.Fail(t, "Error severity metrics not implemented")
235235
})
236-
236+
237237
t.Run("should emit error retry metrics", func(t *testing.T) {
238238
// Expected: should track retry success/failure rates
239239
assert.Fail(t, "Error retry metrics not implemented")
240240
})
241-
241+
242242
t.Run("should support error trending analysis", func(t *testing.T) {
243243
// Expected: should support analysis of error trends over time
244244
assert.Fail(t, "Error trending analysis not implemented")
245245
})
246-
}
246+
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)