diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fb579aca --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + مقترحات المعارضة: تحول الطاقة والعدالة الجنائية والإصلاح الدستوري تهيمن على الأجندة البرلمانية لشهر فبراير + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
آخر الأخبار والتحليلات من البرلمان السويدي (ريكسداغ). صحافة سياسية بأسلوب الإيكونوميست تغطي البرلمان والحكومة والوكالات بشفافية منهجية.
+

مقترحات المعارضة: تحول الطاقة والعدالة الجنائية والإصلاح الدستوري تهيمن على الأجندة البرلمانية لشهر فبراير

+ +
+ +
+

+ تحليل 20 مقترحاً من المعارضة من أحزاب S وMP وC وV تستهدف سياسة الحكومة بشأن الطاقة المتجددة والرقابة الاحترازية الكلية وإصلاح النفايات والاحتجاز الأمني والحقوق الدستورية في فبراير 2026 +

+ +

مقترحات المعارضة

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

استراتيجية المعارضة

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

سياسة الطاقة والصناعة

+

لجنة الصناعة والتجارة (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

مقدم من: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

مقدم من: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

مقدم من: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023908

+
+ +

الرقابة المالية والاقتصادية

+

اللجنة المالية (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

مقدم من: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

مقدم من: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

مقدم من: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023896

+
+ +

الإسكان والقانون المدني

+

لجنة الشؤون المدنية (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

مقدم من: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

مقدم من: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

مقدم من: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023897

+
+ +

البيئة والمناخ

+

لجنة البيئة والزراعة (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

مقدم من: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

مقدم من: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

مقدم من: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023906

+
+ +

الضرائب والمالية العامة

+

لجنة الضرائب (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

مقدم من: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

مقدم من: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023903

+
+ +

العدالة والأمن

+

لجنة العدل (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

مقدم من: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

مقدم من: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023902

+
+ +

الشؤون الاجتماعية والرعاية الصحية

+

لجنة الشؤون الاجتماعية (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

مقدم من: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

مقدم من: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023900

+
+ +

الحقوق الدستورية والديمقراطية

+

لجنة الدستور (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

مقدم من: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

مقدم من: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

لماذا هذا مهم: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

اقرأ المقترح الكامل: HD023894

+
+ + +

ديناميكيات الائتلاف

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 مقترحات مقدمة
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 مقترحات مقدمة
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 مقترحات مقدمة
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 مقترحات مقدمة
  • +
+
+ +

ماذا يحدث بعد ذلك

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..33ce66cd --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Oppositionsforslag: Energiomstilling, strafferet og grundlovsreform dominerer februars parlamentariske dagsorden + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Seneste nyheder og analyser fra Sveriges Riksdag. Politisk journalistik i The Economist-stil, der dækker parlament, regering og myndigheder med systematisk gennemsigtighed.
+

Oppositionsforslag: Energiomstilling, strafferet og grundlovsreform dominerer februars parlamentariske dagsorden

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analyse af 20 oppositionsforslag fra S, MP, C og V rettet mod regeringens politik om vedvarende energi, makrotilsyn, affaldsreform, sikkerhedsinternering og grundlovssikrede rettigheder i februar 2026 +

+ +

Oppositionsforslag

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Oppositionsstrategi

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Energi- og industripolitik

+

Erhvervsudvalget (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Indgivet af: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Indgivet af: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Indgivet af: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023908

+
+ +

Finansiel og økonomisk tilsyn

+

Finansudvalget (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Indgivet af: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Indgivet af: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Indgivet af: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023896

+
+ +

Bolig og civilret

+

Civiludvalget (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Indgivet af: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Indgivet af: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Indgivet af: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023897

+
+ +

Miljø og klima

+

Miljø- og landbrugsudvalget (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Indgivet af: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Indgivet af: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Indgivet af: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023906

+
+ +

Beskatning og offentlige finanser

+

Skatteudvalget (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Indgivet af: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Indgivet af: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023903

+
+ +

Retsvæsen og sikkerhed

+

Retsudvalget (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Indgivet af: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Indgivet af: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023902

+
+ +

Sociale anliggender og sundhed

+

Socialudvalget (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Indgivet af: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Indgivet af: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023900

+
+ +

Grundlovssikrede rettigheder og demokrati

+

Grundlovsudvalget (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Indgivet af: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Indgivet af: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er vigtigt: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Læs hele forslaget: HD023894

+
+ + +

Koalitionsdynamik

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 forslag indgivet
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 forslag indgivet
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 forslag indgivet
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 forslag indgivet
  • +
+
+ +

Hvad sker der nu

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..62c28df4 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Oppositionsanträge: Energiewende, Strafrecht und Verfassungsreform bestimmen die parlamentarische Agenda im Februar + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Aktuelle Nachrichten und Analysen aus dem schwedischen Riksdag. Politischer Journalismus im Economist-Stil über Parlament, Regierung und Behörden mit systematischer Transparenz.
+

Oppositionsanträge: Energiewende, Strafrecht und Verfassungsreform bestimmen die parlamentarische Agenda im Februar

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analyse von 20 Oppositionsanträgen von S, MP, C und V zur Regierungspolitik bei erneuerbaren Energien, Makroaufsicht, Abfallreform, Sicherungsverwahrung und Verfassungsrechten im Februar 2026 +

+ +

Oppositionsanträge

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Oppositionsstrategie

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Energie- und Industriepolitik

+

Ausschuss für Industrie und Handel (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Eingereicht von: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Eingereicht von: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Eingereicht von: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023908

+
+ +

Finanz- und Wirtschaftsaufsicht

+

Finanzausschuss (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Eingereicht von: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Eingereicht von: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Eingereicht von: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023896

+
+ +

Wohnen und Zivilrecht

+

Zivilausschuss (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Eingereicht von: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Eingereicht von: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Eingereicht von: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023897

+
+ +

Umwelt und Klima

+

Umwelt- und Landwirtschaftsausschuss (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Eingereicht von: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Eingereicht von: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Eingereicht von: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023906

+
+ +

Besteuerung und öffentliche Finanzen

+

Steuerausschuss (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Eingereicht von: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Eingereicht von: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023903

+
+ +

Justiz und Sicherheit

+

Justizausschuss (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Eingereicht von: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Eingereicht von: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023902

+
+ +

Soziales und Gesundheit

+

Sozialausschuss (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Eingereicht von: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Eingereicht von: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023900

+
+ +

Verfassungsrechte und Demokratie

+

Verfassungsausschuss (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Eingereicht von: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Eingereicht von: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Warum es wichtig ist: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Den vollständigen Antrag lesen: HD023894

+
+ + +

Koalitionsdynamik

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 Anträge eingereicht
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 Anträge eingereicht
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 Anträge eingereicht
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 Anträge eingereicht
  • +
+
+ +

Wie geht es weiter

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2f58dbee --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Opposition Motions: Energy Transition, Criminal Justice and Constitutional Reform Dominate February's Parliamentary Agenda + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Latest news and analysis from Sweden's Riksdag. The Economist-style political journalism covering parliament, government, and agencies with systematic transparency.
+

Opposition Motions: Energy Transition, Criminal Justice and Constitutional Reform Dominate February's Parliamentary Agenda

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analysis of 20 opposition motions from S, MP, C and V targeting government policy on renewable energy licensing, macroprudential oversight, waste reform, indefinite detention and constitutional rights in February 2026 +

+ +

Opposition Motions

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Opposition Strategy

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Energy and Industrial Policy

+

Committee on Industry and Trade (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Filed by: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Why It Matters: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Read the full motion: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Filed by: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Read the full motion: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Filed by: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Why It Matters: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Read the full motion: HD023908

+
+ +

Finance and Economic Oversight

+

Committee on Finance (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Filed by: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Read the full motion: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Filed by: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Why It Matters: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Read the full motion: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Filed by: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Read the full motion: HD023896

+
+ +

Housing and Civil Law

+

Committee on Civil Affairs (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Filed by: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Why It Matters: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Read the full motion: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Filed by: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Read the full motion: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Filed by: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Read the full motion: HD023897

+
+ +

Environment and Climate

+

Committee on Environment and Agriculture (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Filed by: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Why It Matters: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Read the full motion: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Filed by: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Why It Matters: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Read the full motion: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Filed by: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Read the full motion: HD023906

+
+ +

Taxation and Public Finance

+

Committee on Taxation (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Filed by: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Read the full motion: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Filed by: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Why It Matters: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Read the full motion: HD023903

+
+ +

Justice and Security

+

Committee on Justice (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Filed by: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Why It Matters: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Read the full motion: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Filed by: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Why It Matters: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Read the full motion: HD023902

+
+ +

Social Affairs and Healthcare

+

Committee on Social Affairs (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Filed by: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Why It Matters: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Read the full motion: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Filed by: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Why It Matters: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Read the full motion: HD023900

+
+ +

Constitutional Rights and Democracy

+

Committee on the Constitution (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Filed by: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Why It Matters: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Read the full motion: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Filed by: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Why It Matters: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Read the full motion: HD023894

+
+ + +

Coalition Dynamics

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 motions filed
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 motions filed
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 motions filed
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 motions filed
  • +
+
+ +

What Happens Next

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2db1ddcc --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Mociones de la oposición: Transición energética, derecho penal y reforma constitucional dominan la agenda parlamentaria de febrero + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Últimas noticias y análisis del Riksdag sueco. Periodismo político al estilo The Economist que cubre parlamento, gobierno y agencias con transparencia sistemática.
+

Mociones de la oposición: Transición energética, derecho penal y reforma constitucional dominan la agenda parlamentaria de febrero

+ +
+ +
+

+ Análisis de 20 mociones de la oposición de S, MP, C y V dirigidas a la política gubernamental sobre energías renovables, supervisión macroprudencial, reforma de residuos, detención de seguridad y derechos constitucionales en febrero de 2026 +

+ +

Mociones de la oposición

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Estrategia de la oposición

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Política energética e industrial

+

Comisión de Industria y Comercio (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Presentada por: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Por qué importa: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Presentada por: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Presentada por: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Por qué importa: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023908

+
+ +

Finanzas y supervisión económica

+

Comisión de Finanzas (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Presentada por: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Presentada por: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Por qué importa: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Presentada por: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023896

+
+ +

Vivienda y derecho civil

+

Comisión de Asuntos Civiles (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Presentada por: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Por qué importa: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Presentada por: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Presentada por: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023897

+
+ +

Medio ambiente y clima

+

Comisión de Medio Ambiente y Agricultura (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Presentada por: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Por qué importa: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Presentada por: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Por qué importa: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Presentada por: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023906

+
+ +

Fiscalidad y finanzas públicas

+

Comisión Fiscal (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Presentada por: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Presentada por: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Por qué importa: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023903

+
+ +

Justicia y seguridad

+

Comisión de Justicia (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Presentada por: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Por qué importa: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Presentada por: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Por qué importa: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023902

+
+ +

Asuntos sociales y salud

+

Comisión de Asuntos Sociales (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Presentada por: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Por qué importa: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Presentada por: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Por qué importa: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023900

+
+ +

Derechos constitucionales y democracia

+

Comisión de la Constitución (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Presentada por: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Por qué importa: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Presentada por: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Por qué importa: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Leer la moción completa: HD023894

+
+ + +

Dinámica de coalición

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 mociones presentadas
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 mociones presentadas
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 mociones presentadas
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 mociones presentadas
  • +
+
+ +

Qué sucede a continuación

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0659be43 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Oppositioaloitteet: Energiasiirtymä, rikosoikeus ja perustuslakiuudistus hallitsevat helmikuun eduskunta-agendaa + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Uusimmat uutiset ja analyysit Ruotsin valtiopäiviltä. The Economist -tyylinen poliittinen journalismi, joka seuraa parlamenttia, hallitusta ja viranomaisia järjestelmällisen avoimuuden periaatteella.
+

Oppositioaloitteet: Energiasiirtymä, rikosoikeus ja perustuslakiuudistus hallitsevat helmikuun eduskunta-agendaa

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analyysi 20 oppositioaloitteesta S:ltä, MP:ltä, C:ltä ja V:ltä, jotka kohdistuvat hallituksen politiikkaan uusiutuvan energian lisensoinnista, makrovalvonnasta, jäteuudistuksesta, turvasäilytyksestä ja perustuslaillisista oikeuksista helmikuussa 2026 +

+ +

Oppositioaloitteet

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Oppositiostrategia

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Energia- ja teollisuuspolitiikka

+

Elinkeinovaliokunta (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Jättänyt: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Jättänyt: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Jättänyt: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023908

+
+ +

Rahoitus ja taloudellinen valvonta

+

Valtiovarainvaliokunta (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Jättänyt: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Jättänyt: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Jättänyt: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023896

+
+ +

Asuminen ja siviilioikeus

+

Siviiliasiainvaliokunta (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Jättänyt: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Jättänyt: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Jättänyt: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023897

+
+ +

Ympäristö ja ilmasto

+

Ympäristö- ja maatalousvaliokunta (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Jättänyt: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Jättänyt: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Jättänyt: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023906

+
+ +

Verotus ja julkinen talous

+

Verovaliokunta (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Jättänyt: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Jättänyt: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023903

+
+ +

Oikeus ja turvallisuus

+

Oikeusvaliokunta (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Jättänyt: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Jättänyt: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023902

+
+ +

Sosiaaliasiat ja terveydenhuolto

+

Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Jättänyt: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Jättänyt: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023900

+
+ +

Perustuslailliset oikeudet ja demokratia

+

Perustuslakivaliokunta (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Jättänyt: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Jättänyt: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Miksi sillä on merkitystä: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Lue koko aloite: HD023894

+
+ + +

Koalitiodynamiikka

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 aloitetta jätetty
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 aloitetta jätetty
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 aloitetta jätetty
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 aloitetta jätetty
  • +
+
+ +

Mitä seuraavaksi

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1ad6b352 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Motions d'opposition : Transition énergétique, droit pénal et réforme constitutionnelle dominent l'agenda parlementaire de février + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Dernières nouvelles et analyses du Riksdag suédois. Journalisme politique style The Economist couvrant le parlement, le gouvernement et les agences avec une transparence systématique.
+

Motions d'opposition : Transition énergétique, droit pénal et réforme constitutionnelle dominent l'agenda parlementaire de février

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analyse de 20 motions d'opposition de S, MP, C et V ciblant la politique gouvernementale sur les énergies renouvelables, la surveillance macroprudentielle, la réforme des déchets, la détention de sûreté et les droits constitutionnels en février 2026 +

+ +

Motions d'opposition

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Stratégie d'opposition

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Politique énergétique et industrielle

+

Commission de l'industrie et du commerce (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Déposée par : Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Déposée par : Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Déposée par : Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023908

+
+ +

Finance et surveillance économique

+

Commission des finances (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Déposée par : Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Déposée par : Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Déposée par : Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023896

+
+ +

Logement et droit civil

+

Commission des affaires civiles (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Déposée par : Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Déposée par : Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Déposée par : Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023897

+
+ +

Environnement et climat

+

Commission de l'environnement et de l'agriculture (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Déposée par : Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Déposée par : Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Déposée par : Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023906

+
+ +

Fiscalité et finances publiques

+

Commission fiscale (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Déposée par : Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Déposée par : Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023903

+
+ +

Justice et sécurité

+

Commission de la justice (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Déposée par : Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Déposée par : Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023902

+
+ +

Affaires sociales et santé

+

Commission des affaires sociales (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Déposée par : Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Déposée par : Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023900

+
+ +

Droits constitutionnels et démocratie

+

Commission de la Constitution (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Déposée par : Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Déposée par : Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Pourquoi c'est important : The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Lire la motion complète : HD023894

+
+ + +

Dynamique de coalition

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 motions déposées
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 motions déposées
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 motions déposées
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 motions déposées
  • +
+
+ +

Que se passe-t-il ensuite

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a4dd79ac --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + הצעות האופוזיציה: מעבר אנרגטי, משפט פלילי ורפורמה חוקתית שולטים בסדר היום הפרלמנטרי של פברואר + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
חדשות ואנליזות אחרונות מהריקסדאג השוודי. עיתונות פוליטית בסגנון האקונומיסט המכסה פרלמנט, ממשלה וסוכנויות בשקיפות שיטתית.
+

הצעות האופוזיציה: מעבר אנרגטי, משפט פלילי ורפורמה חוקתית שולטים בסדר היום הפרלמנטרי של פברואר

+ +
+ +
+

+ ניתוח 20 הצעות אופוזיציה מ-S, MP, C ו-V המכוונות למדיניות הממשלה באנרגיה מתחדשת, פיקוח מאקרו-יציבותי, רפורמת פסולת, מעצר ביטחוני וזכויות חוקתיות בפברואר 2026 +

+ +

הצעות האופוזיציה

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

אסטרטגיית האופוזיציה

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

מדיניות אנרגיה ותעשייה

+

ועדת התעשייה והמסחר (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

הוגש על ידי: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

הוגש על ידי: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

הוגש על ידי: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023908

+
+ +

פיקוח פיננסי וכלכלי

+

ועדת הכספים (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

הוגש על ידי: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

הוגש על ידי: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

למה זה חשוב: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

הוגש על ידי: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023896

+
+ +

דיור ומשפט אזרחי

+

ועדת ענייני אזרחים (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

הוגש על ידי: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

למה זה חשוב: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

הוגש על ידי: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

הוגש על ידי: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023897

+
+ +

סביבה ואקלים

+

ועדת הסביבה והחקלאות (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

הוגש על ידי: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

למה זה חשוב: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

הוגש על ידי: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

הוגש על ידי: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023906

+
+ +

מיסוי ומימון ציבורי

+

ועדת המיסים (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

הוגש על ידי: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

הוגש על ידי: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

למה זה חשוב: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023903

+
+ +

משפט וביטחון

+

ועדת המשפטים (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

הוגש על ידי: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

למה זה חשוב: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

הוגש על ידי: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023902

+
+ +

רווחה ובריאות

+

ועדת הרווחה (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

הוגש על ידי: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

למה זה חשוב: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

הוגש על ידי: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023900

+
+ +

זכויות חוקתיות ודמוקרטיה

+

ועדת החוקה (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

הוגש על ידי: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

למה זה חשוב: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

הוגש על ידי: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

למה זה חשוב: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

קרא את ההצעה המלאה: HD023894

+
+ + +

דינמיקת הקואליציה

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 הצעות הוגשו
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 הצעות הוגשו
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 הצעות הוגשו
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 הצעות הוגשו
  • +
+
+ +

מה קורה הלאה

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d3d9fe84 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + 野党動議:エネルギー転換、刑事司法、憲法改革が2月の議会議事日程を支配 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
スウェーデン国会(リクスダーグ)からの最新ニュースと分析。エコノミスト誌スタイルの政治ジャーナリズムで、議会、政府、機関を体系的な透明性で報道。
+

野党動議:エネルギー転換、刑事司法、憲法改革が2月の議会議事日程を支配

+ +
+ +
+

+ 2026年2月、再生可能エネルギー許認可、マクロプルーデンス監督、廃棄物改革、保安拘禁、憲法上の権利に関する政府の政策を標的とするS、MP、C、Vからの20の野党動議の分析 +

+ +

野党動議

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

野党戦略

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

エネルギー・産業政策

+

産業貿易委員会(NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

提出者: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

なぜ重要か: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

提出者: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

提出者: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

なぜ重要か: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023908

+
+ +

財政・経済監督

+

財務委員会(FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

提出者: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

提出者: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

なぜ重要か: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

提出者: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023896

+
+ +

住宅・民法

+

民事委員会(CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

提出者: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

なぜ重要か: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

提出者: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

提出者: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023897

+
+ +

環境・気候

+

環境農業委員会(MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

提出者: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

なぜ重要か: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

提出者: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

なぜ重要か: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

提出者: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023906

+
+ +

税制・公的財政

+

税務委員会(SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

提出者: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

提出者: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

なぜ重要か: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023903

+
+ +

司法・安全保障

+

司法委員会(JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

提出者: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

なぜ重要か: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

提出者: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

なぜ重要か: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023902

+
+ +

社会問題・医療

+

社会委員会(SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

提出者: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

なぜ重要か: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

提出者: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

なぜ重要か: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023900

+
+ +

憲法上の権利と民主主義

+

憲法委員会(KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

提出者: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

なぜ重要か: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

提出者: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

なぜ重要か: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

動議全文を読む: HD023894

+
+ + +

連立動態

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 件の動議を提出
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 件の動議を提出
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 件の動議を提出
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 件の動議を提出
  • +
+
+ +

今後の展望

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6e96a136 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + 야당 동의안: 에너지 전환, 형사사법, 헌법 개혁이 2월 의회 의제를 지배 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
스웨덴 국회(릭스다그)의 최신 뉴스와 분석. 체계적 투명성으로 의회, 정부, 기관을 다루는 이코노미스트 스타일의 정치 저널리즘.
+

야당 동의안: 에너지 전환, 형사사법, 헌법 개혁이 2월 의회 의제를 지배

+ +
+ +
+

+ 2026년 2월 재생에너지 허가, 거시건전성 감독, 폐기물 개혁, 보안구금, 헌법적 권리에 관한 정부 정책을 겨냥한 S, MP, C, V의 야당 동의안 20건 분석 +

+ +

야당 동의안

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

야당 전략

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

에너지 및 산업 정책

+

산업통상위원회 (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

제출자: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

왜 중요한가: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

제출자: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

제출자: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

왜 중요한가: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023908

+
+ +

금융 및 경제 감독

+

재정위원회 (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

제출자: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

제출자: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

왜 중요한가: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

제출자: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023896

+
+ +

주택 및 민법

+

민사위원회 (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

제출자: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

왜 중요한가: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

제출자: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

제출자: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023897

+
+ +

환경 및 기후

+

환경농업위원회 (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

제출자: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

왜 중요한가: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

제출자: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

왜 중요한가: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

제출자: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023906

+
+ +

세제 및 공공재정

+

세무위원회 (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

제출자: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

제출자: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

왜 중요한가: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023903

+
+ +

사법 및 안보

+

법사위원회 (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

제출자: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

왜 중요한가: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

제출자: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

왜 중요한가: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023902

+
+ +

사회 및 보건

+

사회위원회 (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

제출자: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

왜 중요한가: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

제출자: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

왜 중요한가: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023900

+
+ +

헌법적 권리와 민주주의

+

헌법위원회 (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

제출자: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

왜 중요한가: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

제출자: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

왜 중요한가: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

전체 동의안 읽기: HD023894

+
+ + +

연립 역학

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 건 동의안 제출
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 건 동의안 제출
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 건 동의안 제출
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 건 동의안 제출
  • +
+
+ +

앞으로 무엇이 일어나나

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8ae7810c --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Oppositiemoties: Energietransitie, strafrecht en grondwetshervorming domineren de parlementaire agenda van februari + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Laatste nieuws en analyses uit de Zweedse Riksdag. Politieke journalistiek in The Economist-stijl over parlement, regering en overheidsdiensten met systematische transparantie.
+

Oppositiemoties: Energietransitie, strafrecht en grondwetshervorming domineren de parlementaire agenda van februari

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analyse van 20 oppositiemoties van S, MP, C en V gericht op het regeringsbeleid inzake hernieuwbare energie, macroprudentieel toezicht, afvalhervorming, veiligheidsdetentie en grondwettelijke rechten in februari 2026 +

+ +

Oppositiemoties

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Oppositiestrategie

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Energie- en industriebeleid

+

Commissie voor Industrie en Handel (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Ingediend door: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Ingediend door: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Ingediend door: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023908

+
+ +

Financiën en economisch toezicht

+

Financiële commissie (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Ingediend door: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Ingediend door: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Ingediend door: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023896

+
+ +

Huisvesting en civiel recht

+

Commissie voor Civiele Zaken (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Ingediend door: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Ingediend door: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Ingediend door: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023897

+
+ +

Milieu en klimaat

+

Commissie voor Milieu en Landbouw (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Ingediend door: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Ingediend door: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Ingediend door: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023906

+
+ +

Belasting en overheidsfinanciën

+

Belastingcommissie (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Ingediend door: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Ingediend door: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023903

+
+ +

Justitie en veiligheid

+

Justitiecommissie (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Ingediend door: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Ingediend door: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023902

+
+ +

Sociale zaken en gezondheidszorg

+

Sociale commissie (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Ingediend door: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Ingediend door: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023900

+
+ +

Grondwettelijke rechten en democratie

+

Grondwetscommissie (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Ingediend door: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Ingediend door: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Waarom het belangrijk is: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Lees de volledige motie: HD023894

+
+ + +

Coalitiedynamiek

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 moties ingediend
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 moties ingediend
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 moties ingediend
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 moties ingediend
  • +
+
+ +

Wat gebeurt er nu

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..963d8f21 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Opposisjonsforslag: Energiomstilling, strafferett og grunnlovsreform dominerer februars parlamentariske dagsorden + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Siste nytt og analyser fra Sveriges Riksdag. Politisk journalistikk i The Economist-stil som dekker parlament, regjering og myndigheter med systematisk åpenhet.
+

Opposisjonsforslag: Energiomstilling, strafferett og grunnlovsreform dominerer februars parlamentariske dagsorden

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analyse av 20 opposisjonsforslag fra S, MP, C og V rettet mot regjeringens politikk om fornybar energi, makrotilsyn, avfallsreform, sikkerhetsinternering og grunnlovsfestede rettigheter i februar 2026 +

+ +

Opposisjonsforslag

+

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+ +

Opposisjonsstrategi

+
+

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+
+ +

Energi- og industripolitikk

+

Næringsutvalget (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Innlevert av: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Innlevert av: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Innlevert av: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023908

+
+ +

Finans og økonomisk tilsyn

+

Finansutvalget (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Innlevert av: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Innlevert av: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Innlevert av: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023896

+
+ +

Bolig og sivilrett

+

Sivilutvalget (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Innlevert av: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Innlevert av: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Innlevert av: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023897

+
+ +

Miljø og klima

+

Miljø- og landbruksutvalget (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Innlevert av: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Innlevert av: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Innlevert av: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023906

+
+ +

Beskatning og offentlige finanser

+

Skatteutvalget (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Innlevert av: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Innlevert av: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023903

+
+ +

Rettsvesen og sikkerhet

+

Justisutvalget (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Innlevert av: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Innlevert av: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023902

+
+ +

Sosiale saker og helse

+

Sosialutvalget (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Innlevert av: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Innlevert av: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023900

+
+ +

Grunnlovsfestede rettigheter og demokrati

+

Grunnlovsutvalget (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Innlevert av: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Innlevert av: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Hvorfor det er viktig: The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

Les hele forslaget: HD023894

+
+ + +

Koalisjonsdynamikk

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 forslag innlevert
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 forslag innlevert
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 forslag innlevert
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 forslag innlevert
  • +
+
+ +

Hva skjer videre

+
+

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..247b71fe --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + Oppositionsyrkanden: Energiomställning, straffrätt och grundlagsreform dominerar riksdagens februariagenda + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
Senaste nyheter och analys från Sveriges riksdag. Politisk journalistik i The Economist-stil som bevakar riksdag, regering och myndigheter med systematisk transparens.
+

Oppositionsyrkanden: Energiomställning, straffrätt och grundlagsreform dominerar riksdagens februariagenda

+ +
+ +
+

+ Analys av 20 oppositionsyrkanden från S, MP, C och V riktade mot regeringens politik om förnybar energi, makrotillsyn, avfallsreform, säkerhetsförvaring och grundlagsskyddade rättigheter i februari 2026 +

+ +

Oppositionsyrkanden

+

Sveriges fyra oppositionspartier — S, MP, C och V — har lämnat in 20 motioner i den senaste riksdagsomgången och utmanar regeringen inom ett brett spektrum av politikområden, från energiomställning och finansiell reglering till straffrätt och grundlagsskyddade rättigheter. Socialdemokraterna leder med 8 motioner, Miljöpartiet bidrar med 5, Centerpartiet lämnar in 4 och Vänsterpartiet fyller ut oppositionsfronten med 3 inlagor. Bredden och intensiteten i dessa motioner återspeglar en medveten förvalsstrategi: oppositionen nöjer sig inte med att bestrida enskilda propositioner utan söker forma den politiska berättelsen över alla stora politikområden inför valet 2026.

+ +

Oppositionsstrategi

+
+

Socialdemokraterna (S) dominerar med 8 motioner fördelade på sex utskott — förnybar energi (NU), makrotillsyn (FiU), bostadsbedrägerier (CU), avfallsreform (MJU), internationell beskattning (SkU), arbetsrättsliga villkor i upphandling (FiU) och ställföreträdarskap (CU). Denna bredd signalerar en systematisk heltäckande oppositionsstrategi inför valet 2026. S-motionerna om finanstillsyn och arbetsrätt riktar in sig på kärnfrågor för deras väljarbas.

Miljöpartiet (MP) bidrar med 5 motioner koncentrerade till miljöskydd, energiomställning, straffrättsreform och medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter. Detta återspeglar deras dubbla fokus på grön omställning och mänskliga rättigheter, och positionerar MP som en samvetsstyrd oppositionsröst.

Centerpartiet (C) har lämnat in 4 motioner som spänner över energi, miljö, rättsväsende och konstitutionella frågor. Deras ansats till förnybar energi och avfallsreform betonar marknadsorienterade lösningar, medan motionerna om säkerhetsförvaring och grundlagsreform lyfter individuella rättigheter — i linje med partiets liberala centrumposition.

Vänsterpartiet (V) har lämnat in 3 motioner om språkkrav i äldreomsorgen, arbetsrättsliga villkor i upphandling och grundlagsskyddade rättigheter. V ramar genomgående in frågorna ur ett perspektiv av arbetares rättigheter, social jämlikhet och demokratisk ansvarsutkrävning.

+
+ +

Energi- och industripolitik

+

Näringsutskottet (NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Inlämnad av: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Tillståndsramverket enligt förnybartdirektivet är centralt för Sveriges energiomställning. Tre oppositionspartier ifrågasätter hur regeringen balanserar snabb utbyggnad av förnybar energi mot miljö- och processrättsliga garantier.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Inlämnad av: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Socialdemokraterna betonar regleringsgarantier och arbetarskydd i energiomställningen och vill säkerställa att snabb utbyggnad inte undergräver arbetsrättsliga normer.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

Inlämnad av: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Centerpartiet har en marknadsorienterad ansats och argumenterar för effektiviserade tillståndsprocesser som minskar byråkratiska hinder.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023908

+
+ +

Finans och ekonomisk tillsyn

+

Finansutskottet (FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

Inlämnad av: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Makrotillsynen är avgörande när bostads- och kreditmarknaden är under press. Motionen utmanar regeringens hantering av systemrisker vid en tid då hushållens skuldkvoter förblir förhöjda.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Inlämnad av: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling berör hundratusentals arbetstagare. Riksrevisionens granskning avslöjade brister som Vänsterpartiet vill åtgärda.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

Inlämnad av: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Socialdemokraterna delar oron kring upphandlingsvillkor men ramar in frågan inom bredare ekonomisk politik.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023896

+
+ +

Bostäder och civilrätt

+

Civilutskottet (CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Inlämnad av: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Fastighetsbedrägerier och kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen underminerar förtroendet för Sveriges fastighetsmarknad. Identitetskrav vid lagfart är en riktad åtgärd mot bedrägerier.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

Inlämnad av: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Socialdemokraterna betonar konsumentskydd och marknadsstabilitet som grundpelare i bostadspolitiken.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

Inlämnad av: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Ställföreträdarskapsreformen berör några av Sveriges mest utsatta grupper — barn, äldre och personer med funktionsnedsättning.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023897

+
+ +

Miljö och klimat

+

Miljö- och jordbruksutskottet (MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Inlämnad av: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Avfallslagstiftningsreformen påverkar direkt Sveriges återvinningsmål och cirkulär ekonomi. Tre oppositionspartier har lämnat in konkurrerande visioner.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Inlämnad av: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Centerpartiets ansats betonar marknadsbaserade styrmedel och minskad administrativ börda.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

Inlämnad av: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Socialdemokraterna kopplar avfallsreformen till en bredare industristrategi med koppling till jobbskapande.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023906

+
+ +

Beskattning och offentliga finanser

+

Skatteutskottet (SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

Inlämnad av: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Tilläggsskatterapportering för stora koncerner genomför OECD:s Pelare II-ramverk — en omformning av multinationell beskattning.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

Inlämnad av: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater väcker frågor om reciprocitet och intäktsbortfall.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023903

+
+ +

Rättsväsende och säkerhet

+

Justitieutskottet (JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Inlämnad av: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Säkerhetsförvaring representerar en grundläggande förändring i svensk straffrätt. Två oppositionspartier lyfter konstitutionella och människorättsliga farhågor.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

Inlämnad av: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Miljöpartiet fokuserar på medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter och proportionalitet.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023902

+
+ +

Sociala frågor och hälso- och sjukvård

+

Socialutskottet (SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Inlämnad av: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Språkkrav i äldreomsorgen ställer kvalitetsargument mot arbetskraftstillgång och integrationspolitik.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

Inlämnad av: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Vänsterpartiet ramar in frågan som en social jämlikhetsfråga och menar att regeringens ansats riskerar skapa hinder för migrantarbetare.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023900

+
+ +

Grundlagsskyddade rättigheter och demokrati

+

Konstitutionsutskottet (KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Inlämnad av: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Grundlagsskyddad aborträtt, inskränkningar av föreningsfriheten och medborgarskapsreform utgör generationsförändringar i Sveriges grundlag.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

Inlämnad av: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

Varför det är viktigt: Centerpartiet utgår från ett liberalt rättighetsperspektiv och stöder individuella friheter.

+

Läs hela motionen: HD023894

+
+ + +

Koalitionsdynamik

+
+
    +
  • Social Democrats (S): 8 motioner inlämnade
  • +
  • Green Party (MP): 5 motioner inlämnade
  • +
  • Centre Party (C): 4 motioner inlämnade
  • +
  • Left Party (V): 3 motioner inlämnade
  • +
+
+ +

Vad händer härnäst

+
+

Dessa 20 motioner hänvisas till respektive utskott (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) för behandling. Utskottsbetänkanden publiceras normalt 4–8 veckor efter hänvisning, med kammaromröstningar kort därefter. Koncentrationen av motioner kring förnybartdirektivet (prop. 2025/26:118) från tre partier — S, MP och C — signalerar att detta blir en viktig parlamentarisk stridsfråga våren 2026. Samtidigt kommer grundlagsreformpaketet (prop. 2025/26:78) om aborträtt och föreningsfrihet att pröva den blocköverskridande samsynen om grundläggande rättigheter.

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6fed081f --- /dev/null +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ + + + + + + 反对党动议:能源转型、刑事司法和宪法改革主导二月议会议程 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+
瑞典国会(Riksdag)最新新闻与分析。经济学人风格的政治新闻,以系统性透明度报道议会、政府和机构。
+

反对党动议:能源转型、刑事司法和宪法改革主导二月议会议程

+ +
+ +
+

+ 分析S、MP、C和V针对政府在可再生能源许可、宏观审慎监管、废弃物改革、安全拘留和宪法权利方面政策提出的20项反对党动议(2026年2月) +

+ +

反对党动议

+

瑞典四个反对党——社民党(S)、绿党(MP)、中间党(C)和左翼党(V)——在最新一批议会动议中提交了20项动议,在从能源转型、金融监管到刑事司法和宪法权利的广泛政策领域向政府发起挑战。社民党以8项动议领衔,绿党贡献5项,中间党提交4项,左翼党以3项动议补全反对阵营。这些动议的广度和力度体现了一种蓄意的选举前战略:反对党不仅仅是在质疑个别法案,而是在2026年大选前力图在每个主要政策领域塑造政治叙事。

+ +

反对党战略

+
+

社会民主党(S)以8项动议领衔,覆盖六个委员会——可再生能源许可(NU)、宏观审慎监管(FiU)、住房欺诈(CU)、废弃物改革(MJU)、国际税收(SkU)、公共采购劳工标准(FiU)和监护改革(CU)。这种广度标志着一种系统性的全方位反对战略,旨在2026年大选前在每个主要政策领域向政府发起挑战。社民党在金融监管和劳工标准方面的动议针对其选民基础的核心民生议题。

绿党(MP)贡献了5项集中在环境保护、能源转型、刑事司法改革和公民自由方面的动议——可再生能源许可、废弃物改革、住房合作社监管、养老护理语言要求和无限期拘留。这反映了绿党对绿色转型和人权的双重强调,将MP定位为以良知驱动的反对声音。

中间党(C)提交了4项涵盖能源、环境、司法和宪法事务的动议。其在可再生能源许可和废弃物改革方面的做法倾向于强调市场化解决方案和行政简化,而其在无限期拘留和宪法改革方面的动议则突出个人权利——体现了该党的自由主义中间路线定位。

左翼党(V)提交了3项关于养老护理语言要求、公共采购劳工标准和宪法权利的动议。左翼党始终从工人权利、社会公平和民主问责的视角来阐释这些议题——同时挑战政府政策和市场导向的做法。

+
+ +

能源与产业政策

+

工业贸易委员会(NU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

提交者: Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

+

为何重要: 可再生能源指令许可框架是瑞典能源转型的核心。三个反对党质疑政府如何在可再生能源快速部署与环境及程序保障之间取得平衡,反映了在绿色转型步伐和条件上的真实政策分歧。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023913

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

提交者: Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 社民党强调能源转型中的监管保障和工人保护,力求确保可再生能源的快速部署不会损害劳工标准或环境审查流程。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023912

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

+

提交者: Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

+

为何重要: 中间党采取市场导向的方式,主张简化许可流程以减少行政障碍,同时保持可持续性标准——体现了其自由主义经济理念。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023908

+
+ +

财政与经济监管

+

财政委员会(FiU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

+

提交者: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 在住房和信贷市场持续承压之际,宏观审慎监管至关重要。该动议在家庭债务比率仍处于高位之时,质疑政府在系统性金融风险管理方面的做法。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023911

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

提交者: Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

+

为何重要: 公共采购劳工标准影响着政府合同服务中数十万名工人。瑞典国家审计署的审计报告揭示了执法漏洞,左翼党希望予以弥补,并将其定性为工人权利问题。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023898

+
+
+

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

+

提交者: Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 社民党对公共采购劳工标准表达了相似的关切,但将其纳入更广泛的经济政策框架,认为公平的采购实践有助于强化瑞典的社会模式。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023896

+
+ +

住房与民法

+

民事委员会(CU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

提交者: Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

+

为何重要: 房产欺诈和绕过住房合作社法律的行为损害了瑞典房地产市场的信任。土地登记的身份核实要求是一项针对性的反欺诈措施,获得跨党广泛支持,但在适用范围上存在分歧。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023910

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

+

提交者: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 社民党从监管角度切入住房欺诈预防问题,将消费者保护和市场稳定作为住房政策的基石。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023905

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

+

提交者: Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 监护改革关系到瑞典最脆弱的群体——儿童、老人和残障人士。可靠的法律代理是一个涉及基本权利的问题,对数千个家庭具有切实影响。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023897

+
+ +

环境与气候

+

环境农业委员会(MJU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

提交者: Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

+

为何重要: 废弃物立法改革直接影响瑞典在欧盟框架下的回收目标和循环经济目标。三个反对党提出了相互竞争的改革方案,标志着在环境雄心与工业可行性之间的平衡问题上存在真实的政策分歧。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023909

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

提交者: Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

+

为何重要: 中间党在废弃物改革上的做法强调市场化工具和减轻行政负担,主张有利于创新的监管将比规定性指令取得更好的回收成效。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023907

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

+

提交者: Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 社民党将废弃物改革纳入更宏观的产业战略框架,将回收目标与绿色经济中的就业创造和区域发展相挂钩。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023906

+
+ +

税收与公共财政

+

税务委员会(SkU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

+

提交者: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 大型企业集团的补充税务申报落实了经合组织第二支柱全球最低税框架——这是一项重塑跨国税收的举措,影响瑞典作为投资目的地的吸引力。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023904

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

+

提交者: Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

+

为何重要: 对外国国家的股息预扣税豁免引发了关于互惠性、税收损失以及瑞典国际税收政策在财政紧缩时期连贯性的质疑。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023903

+
+ +

司法与安全

+

司法委员会(JuU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

提交者: Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

+

为何重要: 无限期拘留(säkerhetsförvaring)代表着瑞典刑法的根本性转变。两个反对党对相称性、司法监督以及无明确终止期限的拘留风险提出了宪法和人权方面的关切——考验着瑞典刑事司法传统的边界。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023901

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

+

提交者: Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

+

为何重要: 绿党聚焦于公民自由和相称性原则,质疑无限期拘留是否与瑞典的人权义务及宪法保护相兼容。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023902

+
+ +

社会事务与医疗

+

社会委员会(SoU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

提交者: Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

+

为何重要: 养老护理中的语言要求在服务质量论点与劳动力可用性和融合政策之间形成冲突。绿党和左翼党都质疑政府的做法,但出发点不同——绿党强调个人权利,左翼党关注结构性公平。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023899

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

+

提交者: Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

+

为何重要: 左翼党将养老护理语言要求定性为社会公平问题,认为政府的做法可能在不解决根本性人员短缺问题的情况下,给移民工人制造障碍。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023900

+
+ +

宪法权利与民主

+

宪法委员会(KU)

+ +
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

提交者: Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

+

为何重要: 宪法保护的堕胎权、结社自由的限制以及公民身份改革代表着瑞典宪法秩序的代际变革。三个反对党从各自不同的意识形态立场参与其中,考验着各党在基本权利问题上跨党共识的边界。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023895

+
+
+

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

+

提交者: Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

+

为何重要: 中间党从自由主义权利视角切入宪法改革,支持个人自由,同时审视新保护措施与现有宪法原则之间的平衡。

+

阅读完整动议: HD023894

+
+ + +

联盟动态

+
+
    +
  • 社会民主党(S):8 项动议提交
  • +
  • 绿党(MP):5 项动议提交
  • +
  • 中间党(C):4 项动议提交
  • +
  • 左翼党(V):3 项动议提交
  • +
+
+ +

接下来会发生什么

+
+

这20项动议将被分送至各自的委员会(NU、FiU、CU、MJU、SkU、JuU、SoU、KU)进行审议。委员会报告通常在分送后4至8周内出台,全体投票随即跟进。来自社民党(S)、绿党(MP)和中间党(C)三党的动议集中针对可再生能源指令(议案2025/26:118),预示这将成为2026年春季议会的重大焦点。与此同时,关于堕胎权和结社自由的宪法改革方案(议案2025/26:78)将考验各党在基本权利问题上的跨党共识。政府面临多线并进的挑战,这将左右整个春季会期的立法议程。

+
+ +
+ + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file