diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html index 11794051..fb579aca 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ar.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

المصادر والبيانات

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html index 54ffa0d1..33ce66cd 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-da.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Kilder og data

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html index cd2bd334..62c28df4 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-de.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Quellen und Daten

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html index 93392eaa..2f58dbee 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-en.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Sources and Data

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html index ae5b2635..2db1ddcc 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-es.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Fuentes y datos

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html index f238373a..0659be43 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fi.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Lähteet ja data

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html index dd1d81fa..1ad6b352 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-fr.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Sources et données

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html index 7670bac7..a4dd79ac 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-he.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

מקורות ונתונים

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html index 6735c631..d3d9fe84 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ja.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

出典とデータ

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html index ace7ca76..6e96a136 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-ko.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

출처 및 데이터

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html index e007bfeb..8ae7810c 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-nl.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Bronnen en gegevens

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html index 6b04f237..963d8f21 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-no.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Kilder og data

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html index 0e44b1a2..247b71fe 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-sv.html @@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

Källor och data

- + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html index 8769e58b..6fed081f 100644 --- a/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html +++ b/news/2026-02-26-opposition-motions-zh.html @@ -203,11 +203,11 @@

反对党动议：能源转型、刑事司法和宪法改革主导二月议

反对党动议

-

Sweden's four opposition parties — S, MP, C and V — have lodged 20 motions in the latest parliamentary batch, confronting the government across a sweeping range of policy areas from energy transition and financial regulation to criminal justice and constitutional rights. The Social Democrats lead the charge with 8 motions, the Green Party contributes 5, the Centre Party files 4, and the Left Party rounds out the opposition front with 3 filings. The breadth and intensity of these motions reflect a deliberate pre-election strategy: the opposition is not merely contesting individual bills but seeking to frame the political narrative across every major policy domain ahead of the 2026 election.

+

瑞典四个反对党——社民党（S）、绿党（MP）、中间党（C）和左翼党（V）——在最新一批议会动议中提交了20项动议，在从能源转型、金融监管到刑事司法和宪法权利的广泛政策领域向政府发起挑战。社民党以8项动议领衔，绿党贡献5项，中间党提交4项，左翼党以3项动议补全反对阵营。这些动议的广度和力度体现了一种蓄意的选举前战略：反对党不仅仅是在质疑个别法案，而是在2026年大选前力图在每个主要政策领域塑造政治叙事。

反对党战略

-

The Social Democrats (S) dominate the motion count with 8 filings across six committees — renewable energy licensing (NU), macroprudential oversight (FiU), housing fraud (CU), waste reform (MJU), international taxation (SkU), public procurement labour standards (FiU) and guardianship reform (CU). This breadth signals a systematic full-spectrum opposition strategy designed to challenge the government on every major policy front ahead of the 2026 election. The S party's motions on financial oversight and labour standards target core bread-and-butter issues for their voter base.

The Green Party (MP) contributes 5 motions concentrated on environmental protection, energy transition, criminal justice reform and civil liberties — renewables licensing, waste reform, housing co-op regulation, elderly care language requirements and indefinite detention. This reflects their dual emphasis on the green transition and human rights, positioning MP as a conscience-driven opposition voice.

The Centre Party (C) has filed 4 motions spanning energy, environment, justice and constitutional affairs. Their approach to renewables licensing and waste reform tends to emphasise market-oriented solutions and administrative simplification, while their motions on indefinite detention and constitutional reform foreground individual rights — reflecting the party's liberal centrist positioning.

The Left Party (V) has filed 3 motions on elderly care language requirements, public procurement labour standards and constitutional rights. V consistently frames these issues through the lens of workers' rights, social equity and democratic accountability — challenging both government policy and market-driven approaches.

+

社会民主党（S）以8项动议领衔，覆盖六个委员会——可再生能源许可（NU）、宏观审慎监管（FiU）、住房欺诈（CU）、废弃物改革（MJU）、国际税收（SkU）、公共采购劳工标准（FiU）和监护改革（CU）。这种广度标志着一种系统性的全方位反对战略，旨在2026年大选前在每个主要政策领域向政府发起挑战。社民党在金融监管和劳工标准方面的动议针对其选民基础的核心民生议题。

绿党（MP）贡献了5项集中在环境保护、能源转型、刑事司法改革和公民自由方面的动议——可再生能源许可、废弃物改革、住房合作社监管、养老护理语言要求和无限期拘留。这反映了绿党对绿色转型和人权的双重强调，将MP定位为以良知驱动的反对声音。

中间党（C）提交了4项涵盖能源、环境、司法和宪法事务的动议。其在可再生能源许可和废弃物改革方面的做法倾向于强调市场化解决方案和行政简化，而其在无限期拘留和宪法改革方面的动议则突出个人权利——体现了该党的自由主义中间路线定位。

左翼党（V）提交了3项关于养老护理语言要求、公共采购劳工标准和宪法权利的动议。左翼党始终从工人权利、社会公平和民主问责的视角来阐释这些议题——同时挑战政府政策和市场导向的做法。

能源与产业政策

@@ -216,19 +216,19 @@

能源与产业政策

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

提交者： Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)

-

为何重要： The Renewables Directive licensing framework is central to Sweden's energy transition. Three opposition parties contest how the government balances rapid deployment of renewables against environmental and procedural safeguards, reflecting genuine policy divergence on the pace and conditions of the green transition.

+

为何重要： 可再生能源指令许可框架是瑞典能源转型的核心。三个反对党质疑政府如何在可再生能源快速部署与环境及程序保障之间取得平衡，反映了在绿色转型步伐和条件上的真实政策分歧。

阅读完整动议： HD023913

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

提交者： Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： The Social Democrats emphasise regulatory safeguards and worker protections in the energy transition, seeking to ensure that rapid renewable deployment does not undermine labour standards or environmental review processes.

+

为何重要： 社民党强调能源转型中的监管保障和工人保护，力求确保可再生能源的快速部署不会损害劳工标准或环境审查流程。

阅读完整动议： HD023912

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:118 Tillståndsprövning enligt förnybartdirektivet

提交者： Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)

-

为何重要： The Centre Party takes a market-oriented approach, arguing for streamlined licensing processes that reduce bureaucratic barriers while maintaining sustainability standards — reflecting their liberal economic philosophy.

+

为何重要： 中间党采取市场导向的方式，主张简化许可流程以减少行政障碍，同时保持可持续性标准——体现了其自由主义经济理念。

阅读完整动议： HD023908

@@ -238,19 +238,19 @@

财政与经济监管

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:119 Utveckling av makrotillsynsområdet

提交者： Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： Macroprudential supervision is critical as housing and credit markets face continued stress. This motion challenges the government's approach to systemic financial risk management at a time when household debt ratios remain elevated.

+

为何重要： 在住房和信贷市场持续承压之际，宏观审慎监管至关重要。该动议在家庭债务比率仍处于高位之时，质疑政府在系统性金融风险管理方面的做法。

阅读完整动议： HD023911

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

提交者： Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)

-

为何重要： Public procurement labour standards affect hundreds of thousands of workers in government-contracted services. The Riksrevisionen audit exposed gaps in enforcement that the Left Party wants to close, framing this as a workers' rights issue.

+

为何重要： 公共采购劳工标准影响着政府合同服务中数十万名工人。瑞典国家审计署的审计报告揭示了执法漏洞，左翼党希望予以弥补，并将其定性为工人权利问题。

阅读完整动议： HD023898

med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling

提交者： Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： The Social Democrats echo concerns about public procurement labour standards but frame the issue within broader economic policy, arguing that fair procurement practices strengthen Sweden's social model.

+

为何重要： 社民党对公共采购劳工标准表达了相似的关切，但将其纳入更广泛的经济政策框架，认为公平的采购实践有助于强化瑞典的社会模式。

阅读完整动议： HD023896

@@ -260,19 +260,19 @@

住房与民法

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

提交者： Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP)

-

为何重要： Property fraud and circumvention of housing co-op laws undermine trust in Sweden's real estate market. Identity verification requirements at land registration represent a targeted anti-fraud measure with broad cross-party support but disagreement on scope.

+

为何重要： 房产欺诈和绕过住房合作社法律的行为损害了瑞典房地产市场的信任。土地登记的身份核实要求是一项针对性的反欺诈措施，获得跨党广泛支持，但在适用范围上存在分歧。

阅读完整动议： HD023910

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:106 Identitetskrav vid lagfart och åtgärder mot kringgåenden av bostadsrättslagen

提交者： Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： The Social Democrats bring a regulatory perspective to housing fraud prevention, emphasising consumer protection and market stability as foundations of housing policy.

+

为何重要： 社民党从监管角度切入住房欺诈预防问题，将消费者保护和市场稳定作为住房政策的基石。

阅读完整动议： HD023905

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:92 Ett ställföreträdarskap att lita på

提交者： Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： Guardianship reform affects some of Sweden's most vulnerable populations — children, the elderly and those with disabilities. Reliable legal representation is a fundamental rights issue with practical implications for thousands of families.

+

为何重要： 监护改革关系到瑞典最脆弱的群体——儿童、老人和残障人士。可靠的法律代理是一个涉及基本权利的问题，对数千个家庭具有切实影响。

阅读完整动议： HD023897

@@ -282,19 +282,19 @@

环境与气候

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

提交者： Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)

-

为何重要： Waste legislation reform directly impacts Sweden's recycling targets and circular economy goals under EU frameworks. Three opposition parties have filed competing visions for reform, signalling genuine policy divergence on the balance between environmental ambition and industrial feasibility.

+

为何重要： 废弃物立法改革直接影响瑞典在欧盟框架下的回收目标和循环经济目标。三个反对党提出了相互竞争的改革方案，标志着在环境雄心与工业可行性之间的平衡问题上存在真实的政策分歧。

阅读完整动议： HD023909

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

提交者： Stina Larsson m.fl. (C)

-

为何重要： The Centre Party's approach to waste reform emphasises market-based instruments and reduced administrative burden, arguing that innovation-friendly regulation will achieve better recycling outcomes than prescriptive mandates.

+

为何重要： 中间党在废弃物改革上的做法强调市场化工具和减轻行政负担，主张有利于创新的监管将比规定性指令取得更好的回收成效。

阅读完整动议： HD023907

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:108 Reformering av avfallslagstiftningen för ökad materialåtervinning

提交者： Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： The Social Democrats frame waste reform within a broader industrial strategy, linking recycling targets to job creation and regional development in the green economy.

+

为何重要： 社民党将废弃物改革纳入更宏观的产业战略框架，将回收目标与绿色经济中的就业创造和区域发展相挂钩。

阅读完整动议： HD023906

@@ -304,13 +304,13 @@

税收与公共财政

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:102 Utbyte av uppgifter i tilläggsskatterapport och kompletteringar av förfarandet av tilläggsskatt för företag i stora koncerner

提交者： Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： Supplementary tax reporting for large corporate groups implements the OECD Pillar Two global minimum tax framework — a reshaping of multinational taxation that affects Sweden's attractiveness as an investment destination.

+

为何重要： 大型企业集团的补充税务申报落实了经合组织第二支柱全球最低税框架——这是一项重塑跨国税收的举措，影响瑞典作为投资目的地的吸引力。

阅读完整动议： HD023904

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:91 Ett undantag i kupongskattelagen för utländska stater

提交者： Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)

-

为何重要： Dividend withholding tax exemptions for foreign states raise questions about reciprocity, revenue loss and the coherence of Sweden's international tax policy at a time of fiscal tightening.

+

为何重要： 对外国国家的股息预扣税豁免引发了关于互惠性、税收损失以及瑞典国际税收政策在财政紧缩时期连贯性的质疑。

阅读完整动议： HD023903

@@ -320,13 +320,13 @@

司法与安全

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

提交者： Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)

-

为何重要： Indefinite detention (säkerhetsförvaring) represents a fundamental shift in Swedish criminal law. Two opposition parties raise constitutional and human rights concerns about proportionality, judicial oversight and the risk of detention without a defined endpoint — testing the limits of Sweden's criminal justice tradition.

+

为何重要： 无限期拘留（säkerhetsförvaring）代表着瑞典刑法的根本性转变。两个反对党对相称性、司法监督以及无明确终止期限的拘留风险提出了宪法和人权方面的关切——考验着瑞典刑事司法传统的边界。

阅读完整动议： HD023901

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:95 Säkerhetsförvaring – en ny tidsobestämd frihetsberövande påföljd

提交者： Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)

-

为何重要： The Green Party focuses on civil liberties and proportionality, questioning whether indefinite detention is compatible with Sweden's human rights obligations and constitutional protections.

+

为何重要： 绿党聚焦于公民自由和相称性原则，质疑无限期拘留是否与瑞典的人权义务及宪法保护相兼容。

阅读完整动议： HD023902

@@ -336,13 +336,13 @@

社会事务与医疗

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

提交者： Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP)

-

为何重要： Language requirements in elderly care pit quality-of-service arguments against workforce availability and integration policy. Both MP and V challenge the government's approach but from distinct perspectives — MP emphasising individual rights, V focusing on structural equity.

+

为何重要： 养老护理中的语言要求在服务质量论点与劳动力可用性和融合政策之间形成冲突。绿党和左翼党都质疑政府的做法，但出发点不同——绿党强调个人权利，左翼党关注结构性公平。

阅读完整动议： HD023899

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:93 Ett språkkrav inom äldreomsorgen

提交者： Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)

-

为何重要： The Left Party frames elderly care language requirements as a social equity issue, arguing that the government's approach risks creating barriers for migrant workers without addressing underlying staffing shortages.

+

为何重要： 左翼党将养老护理语言要求定性为社会公平问题，认为政府的做法可能在不解决根本性人员短缺问题的情况下，给移民工人制造障碍。

阅读完整动议： HD023900

@@ -352,13 +352,13 @@

宪法权利与民主

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

提交者： Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)

-

为何重要： Constitutionally protected abortion rights, restrictions on freedom of association and citizenship reform represent generational changes to Sweden's constitutional order. Three opposition parties engage from distinct ideological positions, testing the boundaries of cross-party consensus on fundamental rights.

+

为何重要： 宪法保护的堕胎权、结社自由的限制以及公民身份改革代表着瑞典宪法秩序的代际变革。三个反对党从各自不同的意识形态立场参与其中，考验着各党在基本权利问题上跨党共识的边界。

阅读完整动议： HD023895

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utökade möjligheter att begränsa föreningsfriheten och rätten till medborgarskap

提交者： Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)

-

为何重要： The Centre Party approaches constitutional reform through a liberal rights lens, supporting individual freedoms while examining the balance between new protections and existing constitutional principles.

+

为何重要： 中间党从自由主义权利视角切入宪法改革，支持个人自由，同时审视新保护措施与现有宪法原则之间的平衡。

阅读完整动议： HD023894

@@ -366,16 +366,16 @@

med anledning av prop. 2025/26:78 En grundlagsskyddad aborträtt samt utöka

联盟动态

接下来会发生什么

-

These 20 motions will be referred to their respective committees (NU, FiU, CU, MJU, SkU, JuU, SoU, KU) for deliberation. Committee reports typically emerge 4–8 weeks after referral, with plenary votes following shortly after. The concentration of motions on the Renewables Directive (prop. 2025/26:118) from three parties — S, MP and C — signals this will become a major parliamentary flashpoint in spring 2026. Meanwhile, the constitutional reform package (prop. 2025/26:78) on abortion rights and freedom of association will test cross-party consensus on fundamental rights. The government faces a multi-front challenge that will shape the legislative agenda through the spring session.

+

这20项动议将被分送至各自的委员会（NU、FiU、CU、MJU、SkU、JuU、SoU、KU）进行审议。委员会报告通常在分送后4至8周内出台，全体投票随即跟进。来自社民党（S）、绿党（MP）和中间党（C）三党的动议集中针对可再生能源指令（议案2025/26:118），预示这将成为2026年春季议会的重大焦点。与此同时，关于堕胎权和结社自由的宪法改革方案（议案2025/26:78）将考验各党在基本权利问题上的跨党共识。政府面临多线并进的挑战，这将左右整个春季会期的立法议程。

@@ -396,6 +396,6 @@

来源与数据

- + \ No newline at end of file