question on “IEA15MW_01”. #18
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Dear Zhi Liang, Thanks again for participating in this year's LAC Summer Games! Here is a summary of what we talked about after the last LAC-meeting: In general, it is possible to increase measuring distance (SinglePoin_LidarFile.dat -> "RangeGates-Tab" [m]). But it would be necessary for you also to change the buffer time (FFP_v1.IN -> "T_buffer" [s]) accordingly. That is the case because you must take the time the wind needs to travel from the measuring point to the turbine (Taylor's Frozen Turbulence Hypothesis is applied here). Filter delays may also influence your required buffer time. For further reference, you can take a look into David's PhD thesis: "Lidar-Assisted Control Concepts for Wind Turbines" (e.g. chapter 5.5.2). Don't hesitate to approach us should you have any further questions. Best regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Dear all, I have a question about the example provided. Is there a corresponding ROSCO .yaml file available that can be used to reproduce the provided .IN file? Alternatively, could you please explain how the .IN file was generated? Thank you, Javi |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.




Dear Zhi Liang,
Thanks again for participating in this year's LAC Summer Games! Here is a summary of what we talked about after the last LAC-meeting:
In general, it is possible to increase measuring distance (SinglePoin_LidarFile.dat -> "RangeGates-Tab" [m]). But it would be necessary for you also to change the buffer time (FFP_v1.IN -> "T_buffer" [s]) accordingly. That is the case because you must take the time the wind needs to travel from the measuring point to the turbine (Taylor's Frozen Turbulence Hypothesis is applied here). Filter delays may also influence your required buffer time.
For further reference, you can take a look into David's PhD thesis: "Lidar-Assisted Control Concept…