-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
GeographicalName: sourceOfName #84
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
further info requiredFurther info is required to the change proposal.Further info is required to the change proposal.impact on IRThe change proposal has an impact on the IR.The change proposal has an impact on the IR.impact on UMLThe change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram.The change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram.impact on schemasThe change proposal has an impact on the INSPIRE XML .SchemasThe change proposal has an impact on the INSPIRE XML .Schemas
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
further info requiredFurther info is required to the change proposal.Further info is required to the change proposal.impact on IRThe change proposal has an impact on the IR.The change proposal has an impact on the IR.impact on UMLThe change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram.The change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram.impact on schemasThe change proposal has an impact on the INSPIRE XML .SchemasThe change proposal has an impact on the INSPIRE XML .Schemas
Dear
I hope you are all right.
As discussed in another ticket, I think we should change the value type of sourceOfName attribute (from GeographicalName featuretype). As you may know that attribute aims to describe in a human readable way the source of a GeographicalName object.
Regulation 1089/2010 states that field has to be filled with a CharacterString object. That kind of objects aims to express some human readable in one language. As you may know in Belgium we do have three national languages. Even for a Dutch name (for instance "Antwerpen") I do have to express the sourceOfName attribute in both Dutch and French to comply with belgian legislation: the language of the GeographicalName itself does not matter.
That's why I think that LocalisedCharacterString is by far more relevant than CharacterString. With such a value type, one can express in many languages the origin of a specific GeographicalName in a give language. Therefore, the cardinality of sourceOfName should become 1-...
Regards