Commit f5adbcd
authored
ci(release): wire @loopover/contract into the release and publish automation (#9753)
* ci(release): wire @loopover/contract into the release and publish automation
@loopover/contract is a runtime `dependencies` entry of both @loopover/mcp and
@loopover/miner, but it had no publish path — no publish workflow, and no entry
in release-please's config or manifest. It was the only workspace package shaped
for publishing (no `private: true`, `publishConfig.access: public`, a `files`
allowlist) with no automation behind it.
Left alone, the next mcp/miner release ships uninstallable: both are at 3.15.2
locally against 3.14.x on npm, so the pending publish already carries
`"@loopover/contract": "^0.1.0"` against a package that did not exist.
0.1.0 has now been bootstrap-published by hand (npm's OIDC trusted publishing
cannot create a brand-new package, the same bootstrap @loopover/engine needed),
and a Trusted Publisher is configured against publish-contract.yml — so renaming
that file breaks the connection and every publish with it.
publish-contract.yml mirrors publish-engine.yml/publish-ui-kit.yml: unprivileged
validate resolves the version, verifies the commit is on main, resolves the
release commit from the version string rather than tagging HEAD (#8525), builds,
packs, and smoke-tests; privileged publish tags and pushes the exact tested
tarball via OIDC behind environment `release`. No separate typecheck step —
this package's `build` IS `tsc -p tsconfig.json`.
The secret scan needed one deliberate change. Unlike its siblings, this package
SHIPS the redaction logic: dist/telemetry.js defines SECRET_VALUE_PATTERN, whose
source text contains a literal PEM `PRIVATE KEY` header (plus a doc comment
quoting a full one, describing the bug that alternative fixes). The siblings'
verbatim pattern is a guaranteed false positive on every release — verified
against the 0.1.0 tarball. Excluding that one module keeps the check meaningful
for the other 92 files, and a second, narrower scan still runs across everything
including the excluded module, so a real token-shaped leak there still fails.
mcp/miner depend on contract exactly as they depend on engine, so the
reconciliation job now treats both as prerequisites: contract and engine publish
first, and mcp/miner are skipped entirely if either fails, rather than resolving
a dependency version that exists nowhere and failing ETARGET.
Contract stays independently versioned (like ui-kit) rather than joining the
engine-and-dependents linked-versions group: it has only just shipped 0.1.0, and
renumbering it into the 3.x train before it has any consumers costs more than it
buys. Revisit at its next major.
Also adds the LICENSE file the package declares (AGPL-3.0-only) but never
shipped — engine, mcp and ui-kit all carry one.
Closes #9749
* fix(release): put contract in the linked-versions group, not on ui-kit's independent cadence
Review catch on #9753: contract was left out of the "engine-and-dependents"
linked-versions group on the reasoning that it should version independently
"like ui-kit". That reasoning was wrong, and this repo has already paid for the
bug it reintroduces.
mcp-release-please.yml's own header is explicit about what the group is for:
mcp/miner carry a REAL runtime `dependencies` entry, so node-workspace bumps
their range the moment the prerequisite's version changes -- and under
separate-pull-requests: true that bump lands on the dependent's OWN branch,
leaving its package.json requiring a version that exists nowhere (not locally,
since the prerequisite's bump is on a different unmerged branch; not on npm,
since it hasn't published). `npm ci` then fails ETARGET. That was confirmed
live across several release cycles (#7086/#7087/#7107/#7108/#7119/#7120/#7121),
and node-workspace's own `merge` option was already tried and does NOT override
separate-pull-requests.
ui-kit is outside the group because it has NO dependency edge to anything here
-- not because independent versioning is the default. contract has exactly the
edge engine has, so it belongs in the group for exactly the same reason.
Membership tracks the dependency edge, not release cadence; the header now says
so, since "publish it like ui-kit" is the trap that produced this.
The reconciliation ordering added in this PR stays: the group fixes the
release-PR stage (ranges and versions land in one commit), reconciliation fixes
the publish stage (registry propagation and dispatch ordering). Engine needs
both today and contract needs both for the same reasons.
Cost of the fix, stated plainly: contract joins the group's version train
rather than staying at 0.1.0, so its next release will not be 0.2.0. That is a
worse version story than independence and a better correctness story, and
0.1.0 is already published either way.
* ci(release): derive linked-versions membership from the real dependency graph
Adding contract to the group fixed today's instance. It did not fix the class:
group membership is a function of the dependency graph, nothing enforced that,
and the last time an edge was added the config was not updated. #9521 made
@loopover/contract a runtime dependency of both @loopover/mcp and
@loopover/miner without touching linked-versions, and that sat unnoticed until
#9749 -- by which point the package was not even published, so the next
mcp/miner release would have shipped uninstallable.
check-release-linked-versions.ts derives the requirement instead of trusting
memory. It reads the real package.json edges between release-please-tracked
packages and fails when two are joined by a shipping dependency but not by a
linked-versions group -- the exact ETARGET race mcp-release-please.yml's header
documents, and which node-workspace's own `merge` option provably does not fix.
It also closes a second silent gap found while wiring this: sync-release-manifest
builds its work list from the MANIFEST's own keys (`if (!(workspacePath in
manifest)) continue`), so a package added to release-please-config.json but not
to the manifest is silently exempt from the staleness check that stops
release-please re-proposing an already-published version. Adding a package to one
file and not the other had no feedback at all; now it fails.
Deliberately scoped to dependencies/peerDependencies/optionalDependencies.
devDependencies are excluded because they never reach a consumer, and forcing two
packages into permanent version lockstep over a build-time-only edge costs more
than the failure it prevents -- which surfaces immediately in CI on the branch
that introduced it rather than in a published artifact. That tradeoff is written
down at the constant, so the next person hitting it can revisit deliberately.
ui-kit is the case that proves the check is not merely "group everything": it has
no dependency edge, stays ungrouped, and there is an invariant test asserting it
is never reported -- otherwise the check would drag unrelated packages into
lockstep, which is the opposite of the goal.
Verified both ways: removing contract from the group reproduces the #9521 gap and
exits 1 naming both offending edges; removing its manifest entry exits 1 naming
the consequence; the real config exits 0.1 parent 7ffb51e commit f5adbcd
8 files changed
Lines changed: 1313 additions & 22 deletions
File tree
- .github/workflows
- packages/loopover-contract
- scripts
- test/unit
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | | |
19 | 19 | | |
20 | | - | |
21 | | - | |
22 | | - | |
23 | | - | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
24 | 25 | | |
25 | 26 | | |
26 | 27 | | |
| |||
30 | 31 | | |
31 | 32 | | |
32 | 33 | | |
33 | | - | |
34 | | - | |
35 | | - | |
36 | | - | |
37 | | - | |
38 | | - | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
39 | 43 | | |
40 | 44 | | |
41 | 45 | | |
| |||
181 | 185 | | |
182 | 186 | | |
183 | 187 | | |
| 188 | + | |
| 189 | + | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + | |
| 192 | + | |
| 193 | + | |
184 | 194 | | |
185 | 195 | | |
186 | 196 | | |
| |||
320 | 330 | | |
321 | 331 | | |
322 | 332 | | |
323 | | - | |
| 333 | + | |
| 334 | + | |
| 335 | + | |
| 336 | + | |
| 337 | + | |
| 338 | + | |
| 339 | + | |
| 340 | + | |
| 341 | + | |
324 | 342 | | |
325 | | - | |
326 | | - | |
327 | | - | |
328 | | - | |
329 | | - | |
| 343 | + | |
| 344 | + | |
| 345 | + | |
| 346 | + | |
| 347 | + | |
330 | 348 | | |
331 | 349 | | |
332 | | - | |
| 350 | + | |
333 | 351 | | |
334 | 352 | | |
335 | 353 | | |
336 | 354 | | |
337 | 355 | | |
338 | 356 | | |
339 | 357 | | |
340 | | - | |
| 358 | + | |
341 | 359 | | |
342 | 360 | | |
343 | 361 | | |
| |||
353 | 371 | | |
354 | 372 | | |
355 | 373 | | |
356 | | - | |
| 374 | + | |
357 | 375 | | |
358 | 376 | | |
359 | 377 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments