You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Confirmed production incident (loopover PRs #8735/#8737, 2026-07-26 ~01:40Z): the primary reviewer returned the deliberate bail (`INCOHERENT_DIFF_ASSESSMENT`, "Cannot review — the diff appears out of sync with the PR head", #7518/#7520 machinery) with this rationale captured in its own JSON: "The PR title/description describes a trivial test-fixture typing fix, but the diff shows a substantive production change (needsMinerDetection: true added at 7 call sites in processors.ts)".
The diff was CORRECT — #8735 genuinely adds `needsMinerDetection: true` at 7 `authorizePrActionActor` call sites; the PR's title merely undersells its own diff. Title-vs-diff scope mismatch is a REVIEWABLE quality signal (the same class as linked-issue scope mismatch), not evidence of a mechanically stale diff. The bail turned a reviewable PR into `ai_review_inconclusive` → manual-review hold (after the fallback also failed — its own issue, filed separately).
Requirements
Tighten the bail contract so it fires ONLY on mechanical incoherence: an empty/truncated/garbled diff, or file contents contradicting the PR's own file list — never on "the description doesn't match the (valid) diff".
A response that bails while citing description/title-vs-diff reasoning should be treated as a reviewable scope observation: proceed with the review (the model already demonstrated it can read the diff) or convert to a finding — never an abstention.
Context
Confirmed production incident (loopover PRs #8735/#8737, 2026-07-26 ~01:40Z): the primary reviewer returned the deliberate bail (`INCOHERENT_DIFF_ASSESSMENT`, "Cannot review — the diff appears out of sync with the PR head", #7518/#7520 machinery) with this rationale captured in its own JSON: "The PR title/description describes a trivial test-fixture typing fix, but the diff shows a substantive production change (needsMinerDetection: true added at 7 call sites in processors.ts)".
The diff was CORRECT — #8735 genuinely adds `needsMinerDetection: true` at 7 `authorizePrActionActor` call sites; the PR's title merely undersells its own diff. Title-vs-diff scope mismatch is a REVIEWABLE quality signal (the same class as linked-issue scope mismatch), not evidence of a mechanically stale diff. The bail turned a reviewable PR into `ai_review_inconclusive` → manual-review hold (after the fallback also failed — its own issue, filed separately).
Requirements
Deliverables
Test Coverage Requirements
99%+ patch coverage, branch-counted.
Links