Skip to content

Design of Str #53

@bkamins

Description

@bkamins

I understand why Str needs the internal fields like cache etc. (100% support 👍) but I do not understand why their types have to be in a signature and not be fixed - what is the value of this flexibility?

In short why the signature struct Str{T} <: AbstractString is not enough for this type?
`

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions