We want Keychron/zgm to be a respectful, constructive, and welcoming project for everyone who participates.
Contributors, maintainers, and reviewers are expected to help create an environment where people can collaborate safely and productively, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity or expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
Examples of behavior that support a positive environment include:
- showing empathy and patience
- giving and receiving feedback constructively
- assuming good intent while addressing problems directly
- respecting different viewpoints and levels of experience
- focusing criticism on ideas, code, data, and process rather than people
Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
- harassment, intimidation, or discrimination in any form
- abusive, insulting, or derogatory language
- personal attacks or inflammatory trolling
- publishing someone else's private information without permission
- other conduct that would reasonably make collaboration unsafe or hostile
This Code of Conduct applies within project spaces and in public or private interactions that are directly connected to the project, including issues, pull requests, review discussions, and other contributor communications.
If you experience or witness behavior that violates this Code of Conduct, please report it privately to the project maintainers or repository owners through a non-public contact channel.
Please do not use public GitHub issues for sensitive reports.
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying and enforcing this Code of Conduct. They may take any action they determine is appropriate in response to behavior that violates these standards, including warning, editing or removing content, temporarily limiting participation, or removing a contributor from project spaces.
We recognize that mistakes happen. When possible, we encourage direct, respectful correction and a good-faith effort to learn from feedback. Repeated or severe violations may still require stronger action to protect the community.