Security implications of some options ( `/DYNAMICBASE:NO` and ASLR)

[p0358]

The whole project is nice, but I think it might be worth it to mention somewhere in readme that disabling ASLR for the DLL with /DYNAMICBASE:NO would be a pretty bad idea in production in practice other than for tests. Because otherwise all the other options can be used just fine with the goal of creating tiny stub DLLs. (apart from maybe also the merging of sections, but it's much less risky for simple stub DLLs probably)

[Masfo]

Sure, nothing here was never intended for production. All the options were chosen for minimal executable size. On x86 /DYNAMICBASE:NO increases exe size 48 bytes. I'll add a note about production use.