What's the problem this feature will solve?
This issue focuses on extending the QDMI to include pulse level support, as discussed offline.
Exposing the pulse-level support will open up a range of new opportunities, such as calibration and enabling a pulse interface for advanced users. It will also enable the development of software that can optimise user programs at a lower level of abstraction.
Based on some preliminary discussions, the issue will be divided into the following sub-issues to facilitate subsequent discussions and PRs.
Open questions:
Do the supported pulse shapes on a device change from one site/channel to another, or are they global to the device?
FYI:
@burgholzer
@ystade
@echavarria-lrz
@donsano33
@amitQC
Describe the solution you'd like
The solution will be implemented in a series of PRs.
What's the problem this feature will solve?
This issue focuses on extending the QDMI to include pulse level support, as discussed offline.
Exposing the pulse-level support will open up a range of new opportunities, such as calibration and enabling a pulse interface for advanced users. It will also enable the development of software that can optimise user programs at a lower level of abstraction.
Based on some preliminary discussions, the issue will be divided into the following sub-issues to facilitate subsequent discussions and PRs.
Open questions:
Do the supported pulse shapes on a device change from one site/channel to another, or are they global to the device?
FYI:
@burgholzer
@ystade
@echavarria-lrz
@donsano33
@amitQC
Describe the solution you'd like
The solution will be implemented in a series of PRs.