Questions about the results of martensite parent phase reconstruction using ORTools-Example-1 #85
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
Hi @maohonghua, Thank you for reaching out. If I could summarise the "issue" you are facing, it is as follows: This is because when you use the command: grainClick(job,'noScalebar','noFrame');....you are plotting EBSD map pixel data. On the other hand, if you used the command: grainClick(job,'grains','noScalebar','noFrame');...then you are plotting fully filled-in grain data. **Lastly, and importantly, if an explanation from the maintainers resolves your issue, please press the "Mark as answer" button on the appropriate response. Your assistance in this regard enables us to close discussions as complete. ** Hope this helps. Warm regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.




Hi @maohonghua,
Thank you for reaching out.
It is never a bother - we are happy to help out.
If I could summarise the "issue" you are facing, it is as follows:
The output you're getting when you run the script is different from that shown in the training video.
This is because when you use the command:
....you are plotting EBSD map pixel data.
Since your map has un-indexed (zero solutions) pixels, that is why you see "holes" in your grain plot.
On the other hand, if you used the command:
...then you are plotting fully filled-in grain data.
In this case, your plot output will exactly match what you see…