|
| 1 | +# Comprehensive Requirements Quality Checklist |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Feature**: 005-smart-repo-filter (Smart Repository Filtering) |
| 4 | +**Purpose**: Formal gate validation of requirements quality across API, CLI/UX, and Error Handling |
| 5 | +**Created**: 2025-11-29 |
| 6 | +**Audience**: Peer Reviewer (PR Review) |
| 7 | +**Depth**: Formal Gate (~40 items) |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +--- |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Requirement Completeness |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +- [X] CHK001 - Are all menu options ([A], [L], [O], [S]) explicitly specified with filtering behavior? [Completeness, Spec §FR-003/004/005] |
| 14 | +- [X] CHK002 - Is the exact statistics display format fully specified beyond "N repos found, M with activity"? [Completeness, Spec §FR-007] |
| 15 | +- [X] CHK003 - Are requirements for the confirmation prompt response options (Y/n/all) documented? [Gap] |
| 16 | +- [X] CHK004 - Is the `pushed_at` field parsing format explicitly specified in requirements? [Completeness, Spec §FR-002] |
| 17 | +- [X] CHK005 - Are requirements documented for what happens when `--days` parameter is not provided? [Gap] |
| 18 | +- [X] CHK006 - Is the cutoff date calculation (inclusive vs exclusive of boundary day) specified? [Gap] |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +--- |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Requirement Clarity |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +- [X] CHK007 - Is "recent activity" quantified with the specific `pushed_at` field definition? [Clarity, Spec §FR-002] |
| 25 | +- [X] CHK008 - Is "gracefully falling back" in FR-008 defined with specific behavior steps? [Clarity, Spec §FR-008] |
| 26 | +- [X] CHK009 - Is the "warning" message format for zero results explicitly specified? [Clarity, Spec §FR-009] |
| 27 | +- [X] CHK010 - Is "within 5 seconds" in SC-001 measured from what starting point? [Ambiguity, Spec §SC-001] |
| 28 | +- [X] CHK011 - Is "without timeout or performance degradation" in SC-005 quantified? [Ambiguity, Spec §SC-005] |
| 29 | +- [X] CHK012 - Are the specific Search API query qualifiers (`org:`, `pushed:>`) documented in requirements? [Clarity] |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +--- |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +## Requirement Consistency |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +- [X] CHK013 - Are activity filtering requirements consistent between personal repos (FR-003) and org repos (FR-004)? [Consistency] |
| 36 | +- [X] CHK014 - Is the confirmation prompt pattern consistent across [A], [L], and [O] handlers? [Consistency] |
| 37 | +- [X] CHK015 - Are statistics display formats consistent between personal and organization repos? [Consistency, Spec §FR-007] |
| 38 | +- [X] CHK016 - Do plan.md method names align with tasks.md function signatures? [Consistency, Plan/Tasks] |
| 39 | +- [X] CHK017 - Are rate limit handling requirements consistent between Search API and REST API? [Consistency, Spec §FR-008] |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +--- |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +## Acceptance Criteria Quality |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +- [X] CHK018 - Can "135 repos found, 28 with activity" format be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §US1] |
| 46 | +- [X] CHK019 - Is the acceptance scenario "only repositories with recent activity are analyzed" testable? [Measurability, Spec §US1-3] |
| 47 | +- [X] CHK020 - Can "100% accuracy" in SC-003 be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §SC-003] |
| 48 | +- [X] CHK021 - Are independent test criteria for each user story specific enough to execute? [Measurability] |
| 49 | +- [X] CHK022 - Is "significant time savings" in US1/US2 quantified? [Ambiguity, Spec §US1/US2] |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +--- |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +## Scenario Coverage - Primary Flows |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +- [X] CHK023 - Are requirements complete for [A] option with activity filtering? [Coverage, Spec §FR-003] |
| 56 | +- [X] CHK024 - Are requirements complete for [L] option with numbered selection + filtering? [Coverage, Spec §FR-003] |
| 57 | +- [X] CHK025 - Are requirements complete for [O] option with org name input + Search API? [Coverage, Spec §FR-004] |
| 58 | +- [X] CHK026 - Are requirements complete for [S] option explicitly bypassing filter? [Coverage, Spec §FR-005] |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +--- |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +## Scenario Coverage - Alternate Flows |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +- [X] CHK027 - Are requirements defined for user selecting "all" to bypass filter? [Coverage, Spec §FR-006] |
| 65 | +- [X] CHK028 - Are requirements defined for user adjusting timeframe when zero results? [Coverage, Edge Case §1] |
| 66 | +- [X] CHK029 - Are requirements defined for re-prompting after invalid menu selection? [Gap] |
| 67 | +- [X] CHK030 - Is the behavior specified when user cancels during confirmation prompt? [Gap] |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +--- |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +## Scenario Coverage - Exception/Error Flows |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +- [X] CHK031 - Are requirements complete for Search API rate limit (403) handling? [Coverage, Spec §FR-008] |
| 74 | +- [X] CHK032 - Are requirements defined for Search API server errors (5xx)? [Gap, Edge Case §2] |
| 75 | +- [X] CHK033 - Is `incomplete_results` flag handling specified with user feedback? [Coverage, Edge Case] |
| 76 | +- [X] CHK034 - Are requirements defined for network timeout during Search API call? [Gap] |
| 77 | +- [X] CHK035 - Are requirements defined for authentication failure during search? [Gap] |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +--- |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +## Scenario Coverage - Recovery Flows |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +- [X] CHK036 - Is fallback-to-unfiltered-mode recovery path fully specified? [Coverage, Spec §FR-008] |
| 84 | +- [X] CHK037 - Can user retry with different timeframe after zero results? [Coverage, Edge Case §1] |
| 85 | +- [X] CHK038 - Is retry behavior specified for transient Search API failures? [Gap] |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +--- |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +## Non-Functional Requirements - Performance |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +- [X] CHK039 - Is the 5-second response requirement (SC-001) defined for all repo counts? [Coverage, Spec §SC-001] |
| 92 | +- [X] CHK040 - Are performance requirements specified for 500+ repos scenario (SC-005)? [Coverage, Spec §SC-005] |
| 93 | +- [X] CHK041 - Is Search API pagination performance requirement specified for large orgs? [Gap] |
| 94 | +- [X] CHK042 - Is memory usage requirement specified for large result sets? [Gap] |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +--- |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +## Non-Functional Requirements - API Constraints |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +- [X] CHK043 - Is the 30 requests/minute Search API rate limit documented in requirements? [Coverage, Assumptions] |
| 101 | +- [X] CHK044 - Is the 1000 results/query Search API limit documented? [Coverage, Assumptions] |
| 102 | +- [X] CHK045 - Are Search API vs REST API rate limit pool differences documented? [Coverage, Assumptions] |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +--- |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +## Dependencies & Assumptions |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +- [X] CHK046 - Is the assumption "Search API provides `pushed` date filtering" validated? [Assumption, Spec §Assumptions] |
| 109 | +- [X] CHK047 - Is the dependency on Feature 004's `select_github_repos()` documented? [Dependency] |
| 110 | +- [X] CHK048 - Is the `--days` parameter availability from existing config documented? [Dependency] |
| 111 | +- [X] CHK049 - Is the existing `list_org_repos()` method availability validated for T026? [Dependency] |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +--- |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +## Ambiguities & Conflicts |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +- [X] CHK050 - Is there a conflict between "automatic filtering" default and user expectation of seeing all repos? [Conflict] |
| 118 | +- [X] CHK051 - Is the term "active" vs "recently pushed" used consistently throughout? [Terminology] |
| 119 | +- [X] CHK052 - Is the hybrid approach (Search API for org, client-side for personal) explicitly justified in requirements? [Gap] |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +--- |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +## Summary |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +| Category | Items | Focus | Status | |
| 126 | +|----------|-------|-------|--------| |
| 127 | +| Requirement Completeness | CHK001-CHK006 | Missing specifications | ✅ PASS | |
| 128 | +| Requirement Clarity | CHK007-CHK012 | Vague/ambiguous terms | ✅ PASS | |
| 129 | +| Requirement Consistency | CHK013-CHK017 | Cross-artifact alignment | ✅ PASS | |
| 130 | +| Acceptance Criteria Quality | CHK018-CHK022 | Measurability | ✅ PASS | |
| 131 | +| Primary Flow Coverage | CHK023-CHK026 | Core scenarios | ✅ PASS | |
| 132 | +| Alternate Flow Coverage | CHK027-CHK030 | User choice paths | ✅ PASS | |
| 133 | +| Exception Flow Coverage | CHK031-CHK035 | Error scenarios | ✅ PASS | |
| 134 | +| Recovery Flow Coverage | CHK036-CHK038 | Fallback behavior | ✅ PASS | |
| 135 | +| Performance NFRs | CHK039-CHK042 | Speed/scale requirements | ✅ PASS | |
| 136 | +| API Constraints | CHK043-CHK045 | External limits | ✅ PASS | |
| 137 | +| Dependencies | CHK046-CHK049 | External factors | ✅ PASS | |
| 138 | +| Ambiguities | CHK050-CHK052 | Conflicts/terminology | ✅ PASS | |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +**Total Items**: 52 |
| 141 | +**Completed**: 52/52 (100%) |
| 142 | +**Status**: ✅ PASSED |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +## Resolution Notes |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +All checklist items have been addressed in the updated `spec.md`: |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +1. **Glossary added**: Defines "active repository", "inactive repository", "cutoff date", "pushed_at", and "activity filter" |
| 149 | +2. **FR-002 updated**: Specifies `pushed_at` ISO 8601 format and exact filtering logic |
| 150 | +3. **FR-003/FR-004 updated**: Detailed behavior for each menu option |
| 151 | +4. **FR-006 updated**: Confirmation prompt options (Y/n/all) fully documented |
| 152 | +5. **FR-008 updated**: Graceful fallback steps for rate limit, server errors, and timeout |
| 153 | +6. **FR-010 updated**: Default behavior when --days not provided |
| 154 | +7. **Edge cases expanded**: 10 specific scenarios with exact error messages |
| 155 | +8. **SC-001 clarified**: "5 seconds" measured from user pressing Enter |
| 156 | +9. **SC-005 clarified**: "10 seconds" includes pagination, "without degradation" means <10s response |
| 157 | +10. **Performance table added**: Response time and memory limits per scenario |
| 158 | +11. **API Constraints section**: Documents 30 req/min, 1000 results/query, separate rate pools |
| 159 | +12. **Dependencies section**: Validates all internal dependencies exist |
| 160 | +13. **Design Decisions section**: Justifies hybrid approach and default filtering behavior |
| 161 | +14. **US1/US2 updated**: Quantified time savings (~80%, ~90%) |
0 commit comments