DGGS support

[m-mohr]

Tracking issue for DGGS support in openEO:

• openeo.org: Add DGGS dimension type stac-extensions/datacube#38
• openeo-api: Added DGGS dimension type #597 (depends on stac-extensions/datacube)
• openeo-processes (depends on openeo-processes-lint)
  • Implementation Guide: Add DGGS proposal / implementation guide openeo-processes#562
  • Update existing and add new processes: Support for DGGS (new and existing processes) openeo-processes#571
• openeo-processes-lint: Add DGGS support openeo-processes-lint#1
• stac-extensions/datacube: Add DGGS dimension type stac-extensions/datacube#38 (may depend on stac-extensions/dggs)
• stac-extensions/dggs (?): tbc

[m-mohr]

Open question for all PRs regarding DGGS terminology: Do we prefer to use zone or cell? (Currently it's all "zone").

[danlooo]

According to ISO 19170:2021:

While the terms cell and zone are often used interchangeably, "zone" is the strictly preferred
term. Cell is entirely appropriate when specifically discussing a zone's geometry or topology.

Strictly speaking, a cell is just the boundary polygon geometry defining the zone region.

[m-mohr]

Thanks, appreciated. Then our current usage of zone seems preferrable and we can keep it as is.