Call for Collaboration: Mapping LLM Behaviors Under Emotional and Structural Constraints #6
OttoRenner
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi there :)
First of all: thank you so much to everyone who has been digging into how LLMs react to the emotional and relational tone of our prompts. We’ve all put a massive amount of heart and work into our respective corners.
But honestly? Right now, we’re all cooking our own separate soups.
The field of AI behavior moves at a breakneck pace, and instead of everyone trying to solve the puzzle in isolation, I’d love to bridge our projects together. Let’s bundle our forces, share our data, and get to the bottom of this together.
I’ve set up a
RESEARCH.mdfile in the root of this repo as a starting point. It’s an unbiased, structured overview mapping both sides of the coin:🟢 The De-escalation Hypothesis (Why kindness boosts logic & stops freezing)
🔴 The Sycophancy & Bias Risks (Why "too soft" makes the AI hide code errors)
🛠️ Technical Control Frameworks & Failure Taxonomies
This isn't about pushing one single framework—it's about building a solid, community-driven meta-study.
That being said, I will absolutely update the Gentle Coding recommendations according to the findings here. If the data shows it's necessary, that might even mean dropping the "gentle" part entirely and creating a whole new framework. We will see!
If you have a missing paper, an empirical test, some chaotic edge cases, or if you just want to challenge the current theories (contradictory data is highly welcome!): Please drop a comment below or send a quick PR to the
RESEARCH.md.Let's figure this out together – after all, collaborating is way more fun anyway!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions