@ream88 any possibility of making it so that within one test I can stack two expect_once's so that the first call to the given route gets my first expect_once and the second call gets the second expect_once?
Currently the second expect_once would just redefine the first expect_once and I would get an error because the route is called twice.
Originally posted by @agramichael in #88 (comment)
@ream88 any possibility of making it so that within one test I can stack two expect_once's so that the first call to the given route gets my first expect_once and the second call gets the second expect_once?
Currently the second expect_once would just redefine the first expect_once and I would get an error because the route is called twice.
Originally posted by @agramichael in #88 (comment)