Five articles in, the structure of causal discipline is clear.
diff --git a/docs/en/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md b/docs/en/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md
index b522448..4ca75c8 100644
--- a/docs/en/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md
+++ b/docs/en/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ This chapter asks a structural question: when your reasoning engine learns from
---
+
+
+---
+
| # | Article | One-liner |
|---|---------|-----------|
| 01 | [Hume's Fork](01-humes-fork.md) | Humans themselves have never observed causation — Hume showed we rely on constant conjunction and habit, not rational proof |
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/01-humes-fork.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/01-humes-fork.md
index c3cdafa..977c7de 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/01-humes-fork.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/01-humes-fork.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# 休谟的叉子
-
+
两千多年来,"因果"这个词几乎不需要解释。
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/02-ocean-of-correlation.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/02-ocean-of-correlation.md
index c639d56..b18b219 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/02-ocean-of-correlation.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/02-ocean-of-correlation.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# 相关性的海洋
-
+
休谟证明了一件令人不安的事:即使是人类——拥有物理身体、能亲手推台球、能用实验干预世界的人类——也从未直接观察到因果关系本身。我们依赖的是恒常连结和习惯。
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/03-the-ladder.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/03-the-ladder.md
index 4324ad4..c65215a 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/03-the-ladder.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/03-the-ladder.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# 因果的阶梯
-
+
相关性的海洋有多深?换一种问法:如果因果推理有"层次",那么 LLM 停留在哪一层?
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/04-causal-discipline.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/04-causal-discipline.md
index ba86881..06dae02 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/04-causal-discipline.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/04-causal-discipline.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# 因果纪律
-
+
阶梯让我们看清了处境:LLM 天然停留在第一层——关联层。而很多有价值的工程问题需要第二层甚至第三层的推理。
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/05-the-cost-of-honesty.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/05-the-cost-of-honesty.md
index b6e20d6..dcc155d 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/05-the-cost-of-honesty.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/05-the-cost-of-honesty.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# 诚实的代价
-
+
因果纪律听起来很合理——证据分级、时序约束、假说验证、推理溯源。谁会反对"让系统更诚实"?
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/06-the-dao-of-causality.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/06-the-dao-of-causality.md
index d810e10..4622575 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/06-the-dao-of-causality.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/06-the-dao-of-causality.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# 因果之道
-
+
五篇文章走下来,因果纪律的结构已经清晰了。
diff --git a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md
index 93d0a77..ae3dcae 100644
--- a/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md
+++ b/docs/zh/mental-models/ch-06-causality/index.md
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
这一章追问一个结构性问题:当你的推理引擎从相关性中学习,而你的应用需要因果性的可靠性时,系统的什么地方需要补上这个差距?答案不是让模型"变得更聪明"——而是让整个系统对自己保持诚实。我们管这叫因果纪律。
+
+
---
| # | 篇章 | 一句话 |