Hiya. I'd like to formally propose under the new RFC process that we adopt the following policy regarding downloading/uploading/sharing of Terraria worlds & TShock plugins without permission:
- If you profit (monetarily or socially) from unauthorized sharing of Terraria content (like user generated worlds or plugins), we reserve the right to remove you from the community.
- If you admit to stealing people's worlds or plugins, you can be removed from the community.
- If we are presented with proof that you are currently operating stolen content, you can be removed from the community.
This is in response to the threat that, if we were to not unban Marcus, we would be faced with the release of a tool that has the capability of stealing Terraria worlds. Unbanning Marcus is a separate issue, but like I told Ijwu, I think that we're well within our rights to die on this cross.
In particular, I want to support a thriving community of user generated content. I don't want our community to turn into the battleground for stolen content, nor do I want it to become known that we implicitly support servers (through technical support or allowing them to communicate over our services) when we know they're operating stolen content.
This RFC is up for discussion and vote until Tuesday, August 22, 2017. Please give a firm approve or deny, or give more opinion. Obviously, my opinion is above, and my suggestion is approve.
In either approval or denial, I can write a summary and officialize it.
Hiya. I'd like to formally propose under the new RFC process that we adopt the following policy regarding downloading/uploading/sharing of Terraria worlds & TShock plugins without permission:
This is in response to the threat that, if we were to not unban Marcus, we would be faced with the release of a tool that has the capability of stealing Terraria worlds. Unbanning Marcus is a separate issue, but like I told Ijwu, I think that we're well within our rights to die on this cross.
In particular, I want to support a thriving community of user generated content. I don't want our community to turn into the battleground for stolen content, nor do I want it to become known that we implicitly support servers (through technical support or allowing them to communicate over our services) when we know they're operating stolen content.
This RFC is up for discussion and vote until Tuesday, August 22, 2017. Please give a firm approve or deny, or give more opinion. Obviously, my opinion is above, and my suggestion is approve.
In either approval or denial, I can write a summary and officialize it.