|
| 1 | +# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- |
| 2 | +r""" |
| 3 | +=============================================================================== |
| 4 | +Solve Fused Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein with Adam |
| 5 | +=============================================================================== |
| 6 | +
|
| 7 | +Since the FUGW loss is differentiable, it can be minimized with first-order optimization. |
| 8 | +We show how to do this with the `loss_fugw_batch` function and compare the results with |
| 9 | +the dedicated FUGW solver `fused_unbalanced_gromov_wasserstein`. |
| 10 | +""" |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +# Author: Rémi Flamary <remi.flamary@polytechnique.edu> |
| 13 | +# Sonia Mazelet <sonia.mazelet@polytechnique.edu> |
| 14 | +# |
| 15 | +# License: MIT License |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +# sphinx_gallery_thumbnail_number = 3 |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +import numpy as np |
| 20 | +import matplotlib.pylab as pl |
| 21 | +import torch |
| 22 | +from time import perf_counter |
| 23 | +import ot |
| 24 | +from ot.batch._quadratic import loss_quadratic_batch, tensor_batch |
| 25 | +from ot.gromov import fused_unbalanced_gromov_wasserstein |
| 26 | +from sklearn.manifold import MDS |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +# %% |
| 30 | +# Generation of source and target graphs |
| 31 | +# ---------------- |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +rng = np.random.RandomState(42) |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +def get_sbm(n, nc, ratio, P): |
| 37 | + nbpc = np.round(n * ratio).astype(int) |
| 38 | + n = np.sum(nbpc) |
| 39 | + C = np.zeros((n, n)) |
| 40 | + for c1 in range(nc): |
| 41 | + for c2 in range(c1 + 1): |
| 42 | + if c1 == c2: |
| 43 | + for i in range(np.sum(nbpc[:c1]), np.sum(nbpc[: c1 + 1])): |
| 44 | + for j in range(np.sum(nbpc[:c2]), i): |
| 45 | + if rng.rand() <= P[c1, c2]: |
| 46 | + C[i, j] = 1 |
| 47 | + else: |
| 48 | + for i in range(np.sum(nbpc[:c1]), np.sum(nbpc[: c1 + 1])): |
| 49 | + for j in range(np.sum(nbpc[:c2]), np.sum(nbpc[: c2 + 1])): |
| 50 | + if rng.rand() <= P[c1, c2]: |
| 51 | + C[i, j] = 1 |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + return C + C.T |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +def plot_graph(x, C, color="C0", s=100): |
| 57 | + for j in range(C.shape[0]): |
| 58 | + for i in range(j): |
| 59 | + if C[i, j] > 0: |
| 60 | + pl.plot([x[i, 0], x[j, 0]], [x[i, 1], x[j, 1]], alpha=0.2, color="k") |
| 61 | + pl.scatter(x[:, 0], x[:, 1], c=color, s=s, zorder=10, edgecolors="k") |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +def get_sbm_labels(n, ratio): |
| 65 | + nbpc = np.round(n * ratio).astype(int) |
| 66 | + return np.concatenate( |
| 67 | + [np.full(count, label, dtype=int) for label, count in enumerate(nbpc)] |
| 68 | + ) |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +def get_noisy_one_hot(labels, n_classes, noise_level=0.1): |
| 72 | + x = np.eye(n_classes)[labels] |
| 73 | + x += noise_level * rng.randn(*x.shape) |
| 74 | + return x |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +n1 = 15 |
| 78 | +n2 = 10 |
| 79 | +nc1 = 3 |
| 80 | +nc2 = 2 |
| 81 | +ratio1 = np.array([0.33, 0.33, 0.33]) |
| 82 | +ratio2 = np.array([0.5, 0.5]) |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +P1 = np.array([[0.8, 0.03, 0.0], [0.08, 0.8, 0.03], [0.0, 0.08, 0.8]]) |
| 85 | +P2 = np.array(0.8 * np.eye(2) + 0.01 * np.ones((2, 2))) |
| 86 | +C1 = get_sbm(n1, nc1, ratio1, P1) |
| 87 | +C2 = get_sbm(n2, nc2, ratio2, P2) |
| 88 | +labels1 = get_sbm_labels(n1, ratio1) |
| 89 | +labels2 = get_sbm_labels(n2, ratio2) |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +# Use noisy one-hot encodings of the SBM classes as node features. |
| 92 | +feature_dim = max(nc1, nc2) |
| 93 | +x1 = get_noisy_one_hot(labels1, feature_dim) |
| 94 | +x2 = get_noisy_one_hot(labels2, feature_dim) |
| 95 | +all_features = np.vstack([x1, x2]) |
| 96 | +feature_min = all_features[:, :3].min(axis=0, keepdims=True) |
| 97 | +feature_max = all_features[:, :3].max(axis=0, keepdims=True) |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +# get 2d positions for visualization |
| 100 | +pos1 = MDS(dissimilarity="precomputed", random_state=0, n_init=1).fit_transform(1 - C1) |
| 101 | +pos2 = MDS(dissimilarity="precomputed", random_state=0, n_init=1).fit_transform(1 - C2) |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +colors1 = np.clip( |
| 104 | + (x1 - feature_min) / np.maximum(feature_max - feature_min, 1e-15), 0.0, 1.0 |
| 105 | +) |
| 106 | +colors2 = np.clip( |
| 107 | + (x2 - feature_min) / np.maximum(feature_max - feature_min, 1e-15), 0.0, 1.0 |
| 108 | +) |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +pl.figure(1, (10, 5)) |
| 112 | +pl.clf() |
| 113 | +pl.subplot(1, 2, 1) |
| 114 | +plot_graph(pos1, C1, color=colors1) |
| 115 | +pl.title("SBM source graph") |
| 116 | +pl.axis("off") |
| 117 | +pl.subplot(1, 2, 2) |
| 118 | +plot_graph(pos2, C2, color=colors2) |
| 119 | +pl.title("SBM target graph") |
| 120 | +_ = pl.axis("off") |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +# %% |
| 124 | +# Solve FUGW with Adam |
| 125 | +# ---------------- |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +# Even though `loss_fugw_batch` supports batches of problems, we use a |
| 128 | +# batch of size 1 here for clarity. |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +a = ot.unif(C1.shape[0]) |
| 131 | +b = ot.unif(C2.shape[0]) |
| 132 | +M = ot.dist(x1, x2) |
| 133 | +M /= M.max() |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +a_torch = torch.tensor(a[None, :]) |
| 136 | +b_torch = torch.tensor(b[None, :]) |
| 137 | +C1_torch = torch.tensor(C1[None, :, :]) |
| 138 | +C2_torch = torch.tensor(C2[None, :, :]) |
| 139 | +M_torch = torch.tensor(M[None, :, :]) |
| 140 | +L = tensor_batch(a_torch, b_torch, C1_torch, C2_torch, loss="sqeuclidean") |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +alpha = 0.5 |
| 143 | +reg_marginals = 0.5 |
| 144 | +lr = 5e-2 |
| 145 | +nb_iter_max = 1500 |
| 146 | +tol = 1e-7 |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +T0_torch = a_torch[:, :, None] * b_torch[:, None, :] |
| 149 | +T_torch = torch.log(torch.expm1(T0_torch)).clone().requires_grad_(True) |
| 150 | +optimizer = torch.optim.Adam([T_torch], lr=lr) |
| 151 | +loss_iter = [] |
| 152 | +mass_iter = [] |
| 153 | +previous_plan_torch = None |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +tic = perf_counter() |
| 156 | +for i in range(nb_iter_max): |
| 157 | + optimizer.zero_grad() |
| 158 | + # Positive transport plan parameterized as log(1 + exp(T)). |
| 159 | + plan_torch = torch.nn.functional.softplus(T_torch) |
| 160 | + loss = loss_quadratic_batch( |
| 161 | + a_torch, |
| 162 | + b_torch, |
| 163 | + C1_torch, |
| 164 | + C2_torch, |
| 165 | + plan_torch, |
| 166 | + M_torch, |
| 167 | + alpha=alpha, |
| 168 | + unbalanced=reg_marginals, |
| 169 | + unbalanced_type="kl", |
| 170 | + recompute_const=True, |
| 171 | + )[0] |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | + loss_iter.append(float(loss.detach())) |
| 174 | + mass_iter.append(float(plan_torch.detach().sum())) |
| 175 | + if previous_plan_torch is not None: |
| 176 | + err = float(torch.sum(torch.abs(plan_torch.detach() - previous_plan_torch))) |
| 177 | + if err < tol: |
| 178 | + break |
| 179 | + previous_plan_torch = plan_torch.detach().clone() |
| 180 | + loss.backward() |
| 181 | + optimizer.step() |
| 182 | +time_adam = perf_counter() - tic |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +T_adam = torch.nn.functional.softplus(T_torch).detach().cpu().numpy()[0] |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | +# %% |
| 188 | +# Compare with the dedicated FUGW solver |
| 189 | +# ------------------------------------- |
| 190 | +# |
| 191 | +# The dedicated solver uses a block coordinate descent (BCD) scheme. We compare |
| 192 | +# the coupling it returns with the one obtained by direct Adam minimization of |
| 193 | +# `loss_fugw_batch`. |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +def evaluate_batch_fugw_loss(plan): |
| 197 | + plan_torch = torch.tensor(plan[None, :, :], dtype=M_torch.dtype) |
| 198 | + loss = loss_quadratic_batch( |
| 199 | + a_torch, |
| 200 | + b_torch, |
| 201 | + C1_torch, |
| 202 | + C2_torch, |
| 203 | + plan_torch, |
| 204 | + M_torch, |
| 205 | + alpha=alpha, |
| 206 | + unbalanced=reg_marginals, |
| 207 | + unbalanced_type="kl", |
| 208 | + recompute_const=True, |
| 209 | + )[0] |
| 210 | + return float(loss.detach()) |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +tic = perf_counter() |
| 214 | +result = ot.solve_gromov( |
| 215 | + C1, C2, M, a, b, alpha=alpha, reg=0, unbalanced_type="kl", unbalanced=reg_marginals |
| 216 | +) |
| 217 | +time_bcd = perf_counter() - tic |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +loss_adam_final = evaluate_batch_fugw_loss(T_adam) |
| 220 | +T_bcd = result.plan |
| 221 | +loss_bcd_final = evaluate_batch_fugw_loss(T_bcd) |
| 222 | +mass_bcd = T_bcd.sum() |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +pl.figure(2, (10, 4)) |
| 225 | +pl.clf() |
| 226 | +pl.subplot(1, 2, 1) |
| 227 | +pl.plot(loss_iter, label="Adam") |
| 228 | +pl.axhline(loss_bcd_final, color="C1", linestyle="--", label="BCD solver") |
| 229 | +pl.grid() |
| 230 | +pl.title("FUGW loss along iterations") |
| 231 | +pl.xlabel("Iterations") |
| 232 | +pl.legend() |
| 233 | +pl.subplot(1, 2, 2) |
| 234 | +pl.plot(mass_iter, label="Adam") |
| 235 | +pl.axhline(mass_bcd, color="C1", linestyle="--", label="BCD solver") |
| 236 | +pl.grid() |
| 237 | +pl.title("Transport mass") |
| 238 | +pl.xlabel("Iterations") |
| 239 | +_ = pl.legend() |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +# %% |
| 243 | +# Visualize the learned couplings |
| 244 | +# ------------------------------- |
| 245 | +# We visualize the couplings obtained by both methods to compare them. On this example, both methods recover similar couplings, |
| 246 | +# but direct minimization reaches a lower `loss_fugw_batch` value at the cost |
| 247 | +# of a longer runtime. |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | +vmin = min(T_adam.min(), T_bcd.min()) |
| 250 | +vmax = max(T_adam.max(), T_bcd.max()) |
| 251 | +pl.figure(3, (10, 4)) |
| 252 | +pl.clf() |
| 253 | +pl.subplot(1, 2, 1) |
| 254 | +pl.imshow(T_adam, interpolation="nearest", cmap="Blues", vmin=vmin, vmax=vmax) |
| 255 | +pl.title( |
| 256 | + f"Coupling from direct minimization\nloss={loss_adam_final:.3f}, time={time_adam:.2f}s" |
| 257 | +) |
| 258 | +pl.xlabel("Target nodes") |
| 259 | +pl.ylabel("Source nodes") |
| 260 | +pl.colorbar() |
| 261 | +pl.subplot(1, 2, 2) |
| 262 | +pl.imshow(T_bcd, interpolation="nearest", cmap="Blues", vmin=vmin, vmax=vmax) |
| 263 | +pl.title(f"Coupling from BCD solver\nloss={loss_bcd_final:.3f}, time={time_bcd:.2f}s") |
| 264 | +pl.xlabel("Target nodes") |
| 265 | +pl.ylabel("Source nodes") |
| 266 | +_ = pl.colorbar() |
0 commit comments