Skip to content

Improve survey strategies (Step 1) #3

@GiggleLiu

Description

@GiggleLiu

Current Survey Strategies

The AI picks from these strategies during the survey step (Step 1) based on what is known vs. unknown in each iteration:

# Strategy When to use
1 Landscape mapping First iteration default — broad field overview
2 Adjacent subfield Deep-dive into a neighboring cluster identified in prior iteration
3 Cross-vocabulary Abstract away jargon, search other fields for the same structural problem
4 Cross-method Same problem, different computational or experimental approaches
5 Historical lineage Who tried before, what failed, what changed since
6 Negative results Search for papers showing what does not work
7 Benchmarks and datasets What evaluation infrastructure exists

How to contribute

This list is not exhaustive — there are likely more effective survey strategies we haven't thought of yet. If you know of a strategy that works well in your field, or you've noticed a gap in how the survey step explores the literature, please suggest it here!

Some questions to consider:

  • Are there survey strategies specific to your research domain that are missing?
  • Are there strategies that would help discover overlooked or underrepresented work?
  • Should any existing strategies be refined, split, or merged?
  • Are there strategies for discovering non-traditional sources (patents, standards, industry reports, preregistrations)?

Please describe:

  1. The strategy name
  2. When to use it (what gap does it fill?)
  3. An example of how it would work in practice

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions