Help Me Understand the AFGL Methane Profiles #1078
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
This was an index error in my generation code. The CH4 file contained the CO values. I made a mistake when porting this.
The latest [subversion](https://arts.mi.uni-hamburg.de/svn/rt/arts-xml-data/trunk/) contains correct and updated values.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
riclarsson
-
|
The arts-xml-data-3.0.0dev8.zip file on the pre-release page also contains the corrected data now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm looking at the XML atmospheric profile data in ARTS 3.0.0dev8, zip file found here.
In directory "arts-xml-data-3.0.0dev8\planets\Earth\afgl" are a variety of atmospheric profiles for Earth. I assumed these are the same or updated versions of the profiles originally produced by AFGL in 1986, as per the readme.txt. In the original data, the US Standard surface concentration of methane (CH4) was 1.7 PPMV (Table 1f, page 9 of the pdf). Current values are more like 1.9 PPMV, but that's different issue.
Looking in the US Standard methane profile contained in the ARTS 3.0.0 release, in file name CH4.xml, the surface concentration is 1.5e-07. Is that a volume mixing ratio? I'm lousy at math, but if that's a VMR then I think it translates to a concentration of 0.15 PPM, which is wildly different than the original concentration. Other profiles -- subarctic, tropical -- are similar.
So the question is, have I made some bad assumptions, or bad math, or is the data from another planet by mistake?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions