It would be interesting to have anchors to the coordinates that makes the line up.
I know it was already proposed in #640 and closed as not planned after the author refused the proposed syntax (which was very reasonable). Could you add it ?
The proposed syntax was : for a line name "line", "line.pt-1" for the first point and so on.
The advantages I see :
- the line function resolves coordinates so no need to resolve them again if they are necessary elsewhere
- it add the possibility to compute the line length (and if close: true, the area with the shoelace formula)
In the angle function, the measure can be accessed if a function is given to the label which is awesome, could the same be implemented for the length and area ?
Thanks
It would be interesting to have anchors to the coordinates that makes the line up.
I know it was already proposed in #640 and closed as not planned after the author refused the proposed syntax (which was very reasonable). Could you add it ?
The proposed syntax was : for a line name "line", "line.pt-1" for the first point and so on.
The advantages I see :
In the angle function, the measure can be accessed if a function is given to the label which is awesome, could the same be implemented for the length and area ?
Thanks