Skip to content

pull_request_template.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
27 lines (19 loc) · 1.38 KB

pull_request_template.md

File metadata and controls

27 lines (19 loc) · 1.38 KB
Raw

Summary

Describe the user-facing or content change and why it is needed.

Content evidence

  • Official source URL(s):
  • Academic year or intake covered:
  • Date checked (UTC):
  • Records changed (IDs/slugs):

Use the university, scholarship provider, or government source that owns the fact. Aggregators, blogs, and search snippets may help discovery, but must not be the sole evidence for admissions facts.

Checklist

  • I used official sources for deadlines, fees, requirements, scholarships, and application links.
  • I updated sourceIds, verifiedAt, reviewAfter, and status where applicable.
  • I used null / not-announced when the current cycle has not been published; I did not copy an old date into a new cycle.
  • English source content is complete.
  • Chinese and Russian changes were reviewed by a person; machine output is not being published unreviewed.
  • I did not add passports, transcripts, contact submissions, or other personal applicant data.
  • I ran npm run lint, npm run typecheck, npm test, and npm run validate:data.
  • I checked the affected pages in the Vercel preview, including mobile and language switching.

Reviewer notes

Call out uncertainty, temporary source outages, translation text that needs special attention, or follow-up work. Automation may report issues, but it must never decide or publish admissions facts.