diff --git a/GITHUB_ACTIONS_ANALYSIS.md b/GITHUB_ACTIONS_ANALYSIS.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..332d811d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/GITHUB_ACTIONS_ANALYSIS.md
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+# GitHub Actions Analysis
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+This document provides a comprehensive analysis of the GitHub Actions workflows in the cot-rs/cot repository. The analysis covers performance, coverage, correctness, and potential improvements across all workflows.
+
+## Current Workflow Overview
+
+The repository has 7 main workflow files:
+
+1. **rust.yml** (455 lines) - Main CI/CD pipeline
+2. **release-plz.yml** (65 lines) - Automated releases
+3. **bencher-pr-benchmarks.yml** (54 lines) - PR benchmarking
+4. **bencher-base-benchmarks.yml** (53 lines) - Base branch benchmarking
+5. **bencher-closed-pr.yml** (28 lines) - PR cleanup
+6. **audit.yml** (24 lines) - Security auditing
+7. **labeler.yml** (14 lines) - Automatic labeling
+
+## Detailed Analysis
+
+### 1. Main CI Pipeline (rust.yml)
+
+#### Strengths ✅
+
+- **Comprehensive testing matrix**: Tests across 3 Rust versions (stable, nightly, MSRV) and 3 OS platforms (Ubuntu, macOS, Windows)
+- **Efficient caching**: Uses both `rust-cache` and `sccache` for build artifact caching
+- **Good job dependency management**: Uses `needs` to create a proper dependency graph with `check` as the prerequisite
+- **Concurrency control**: Properly cancels outdated runs with `cancel-in-progress: true`
+- **Advanced checks**: Includes miri, cargo-deny, machete, semver-checks, minimal-versions, and feature-powerset testing
+- **Code coverage**: Integrated with Codecov for coverage tracking
+- **Security focused**: Includes license checking, dependency auditing, and security scanning
+- **Avoids duplicate runs**: Properly filters PRs to avoid double-running on internal branches
+
+#### Areas for Improvement 🔧
+
+**Performance Issues:**
+
+1. **Long-running coverage job**: The coverage job runs on nightly with all features and can take a significant amount of time. Recent runs show ~65 minutes for successful completion.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider running coverage only on push to master or on a schedule, not on every PR. Or make it optional/non-blocking for PRs.
+
+2. **Matrix explosion**: The build matrix creates 9 jobs (3 Rust versions × 3 OS), which is comprehensive but resource-intensive.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider making nightly builds optional (already done with `continue-on-error`) and potentially running MSRV/macOS/Windows checks only on schedule or final PR approval rather than every push.
+
+3. **Redundant caching configurations**: Several jobs use the same caching keys and configurations, but some save cache while others don't.
+   - **Recommendation**: Ensure consistent caching strategy. The `save-if: 'false'` on downstream jobs is good, but verify that cache is actually being saved by the `check` job.
+
+4. **Docker compose startup in multiple jobs**: Both `external-deps` and `coverage` jobs start docker compose, which adds overhead.
+   - **Recommendation**: Could potentially combine these jobs or share infrastructure if possible.
+
+**Coverage Gaps:**
+
+1. **No cargo-audit integration in main workflow**: While there's a separate `audit.yml` that runs daily and on Cargo file changes, it might be beneficial to also run it in the main CI on PRs.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider adding a lightweight audit check in the main workflow or ensure the audit workflow properly blocks PRs.
+
+2. **Examples not tested in matrix**: The repository has multiple examples, but they're not explicitly tested across the matrix of Rust versions and platforms.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider adding a job that builds all examples to ensure they remain functional.
+
+3. **No explicit documentation build check**: While doc tests are run, there's no explicit check that `cargo doc` completes without warnings.
+   - **Recommendation**: Add `cargo doc --all-features --no-deps` with `RUSTDOCFLAGS=-D warnings` to catch documentation issues.
+
+**Correctness Issues:**
+
+1. **YAML anchor usage with unsafe syntax**: Lines 18-20 use YAML anchors (`&rust_stable`, `&rust_nightly`) within env section, but this syntax is not properly supported in GitHub Actions environment variables.
+   ```yaml
+   _RUST_STABLE: &rust_stable stable
+   _RUST_NIGHTLY: &rust_nightly nightly-2025-11-11
+   ```
+   These anchors are then referenced in the matrix as `*rust_stable` and `*rust_nightly`. While this might work, it's non-standard and could cause issues.
+   - **Recommendation**: Move these to a proper YAML anchor section or use direct values/matrix inputs.
+
+2. **Inconsistent toolchain installation**: Some jobs use `toolchain: stable` while others use `toolchain: *rust_stable` (line 65), which could lead to version mismatches if anchors aren't properly resolved.
+   - **Recommendation**: Use explicit version strings or ensure anchors are properly set up.
+
+3. **Missing timeout on long-running jobs**: Jobs like `coverage`, `build`, and `miri` don't have timeout-minutes specified, which could lead to hung jobs consuming resources.
+   - **Recommendation**: Add `timeout-minutes: 60` (or appropriate values) to all jobs.
+
+4. **External dependencies job uses nightly but comment suggests macros require it**: Line 156 says "cot_macros ui tests require nightly" but it's not clear if this is always necessary or just for UI tests.
+   - **Recommendation**: Document why nightly is required or consider making this more flexible.
+
+**Other Observations:**
+
+1. **Disk space reclamation only in coverage**: The disk space cleanup (lines 206-212) is only in the coverage job, but other jobs might also benefit from it, especially on resource-constrained runners.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider adding this to other heavy jobs or create a reusable action.
+
+2. **Nextest usage**: Good use of cargo-nextest for faster test execution, but make sure doc tests are also covered (which is done on line 111).
+
+3. **MSRV is 1.88**: This is quite recent (Rust 1.88 doesn't exist yet as of writing this analysis, suggesting forward-looking MSRV). Verify this is intentional.
+   - **Recommendation**: Update to actual MSRV or verify this is a placeholder.
+
+### 2. Benchmarking Workflows (bencher-*.yml)
+
+#### Strengths ✅
+
+- **Proper fork handling**: Both PR and base benchmarking properly handle forks with the condition check
+- **Integrated with Bencher.dev**: Good integration with a benchmarking platform for tracking performance over time
+- **Proper cleanup**: The closed PR workflow archives branches to avoid clutter
+- **Caching strategy**: Uses the same cache keys as main CI for consistency
+
+#### Areas for Improvement 🔧
+
+1. **Only benchmarks one package**: Both workflows run `cargo bench --package cot --features test`, but the workspace has multiple packages (cot-cli, cot-core, cot-macros, cot-codegen).
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider benchmarking other packages or document why only `cot` is benchmarked.
+
+2. **No fallback for fork PRs**: The condition `github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository` means fork PRs don't get benchmarked at all.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider a safe way to benchmark fork PRs, perhaps with approval or on a schedule.
+
+3. **Different threshold configurations**: Base benchmarks use threshold settings while PR benchmarks don't. This could lead to inconsistent behavior.
+   - **Recommendation**: Document why these differ or make them consistent.
+
+### 3. Security Audit (audit.yml)
+
+#### Strengths ✅
+
+- **Daily scheduling**: Runs daily at midnight to catch new vulnerabilities
+- **Proper triggers**: Runs on changes to Cargo files
+- **Uses official action**: Uses `rustsec/audit-check` which is well-maintained
+- **Can create issues**: Has permissions to create issues for vulnerabilities
+
+#### Areas for Improvement 🔧
+
+1. **Not integrated with main CI**: PRs don't run audit checks before merging, only after.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider adding a lightweight audit check in the main workflow or make this a required check for PRs.
+
+2. **No ignore list**: If there are known vulnerabilities that can't be fixed immediately, there's no configuration for ignoring them temporarily.
+   - **Recommendation**: Add an `audit.toml` file if needed for managing temporary exceptions.
+
+### 4. Release Automation (release-plz.yml)
+
+#### Strengths ✅
+
+- **Proper permissions**: Uses minimal necessary permissions with proper scoping
+- **Bot token generation**: Uses GitHub App for better security than PAT
+- **Two-phase process**: Separates PR creation from actual release
+- **Repository ownership check**: Only runs on the main repository
+- **Environment protection**: Uses GitHub environment for crates.io releases
+- **Full git history**: Uses `fetch-depth: 0` for proper changelog generation
+
+#### Areas for Improvement 🔧
+
+1. **Both jobs run on every push to master**: This might be excessive and could be optimized.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider if both jobs need to run every time or if they could be conditional.
+
+2. **No caching**: These jobs don't use caching, so they might be slower than necessary.
+   - **Recommendation**: Add rust-cache if the jobs take significant time.
+
+3. **Concurrency control only on PR job**: The release job doesn't have concurrency control.
+   - **Recommendation**: Add concurrency control to the release job to prevent multiple simultaneous releases.
+
+### 5. Auto-labeling (labeler.yml)
+
+#### Strengths ✅
+
+- **Simple and focused**: Does one thing well
+- **Uses pull_request_target**: Properly handles fork PRs
+- **Up-to-date action**: Uses latest version (v6)
+
+#### Areas for Improvement 🔧
+
+1. **Could be more granular**: The labeler configuration (in `.github/labeler.yml`) could be more detailed.
+   - **Recommendation**: Consider adding labels for specific areas like tests, docs, benchmarks, etc.
+
+2. **Manual dispatch**: While workflow_dispatch is enabled, it's not clear when/why manual triggering would be useful.
+   - **Recommendation**: Document when manual labeling should be used or remove if not needed.
+
+## Performance Optimization Recommendations
+
+### High Priority
+
+1. **Make coverage job non-blocking for PRs**: Run only on master or make it optional
+2. **Add timeouts to all jobs**: Prevent hung jobs from consuming resources
+3. **Fix YAML anchor issues**: Use proper syntax for version management
+4. **Reduce matrix on PRs**: Run full matrix only on master/schedule
+
+### Medium Priority
+
+5. **Add cargo doc check**: Ensure documentation builds cleanly
+6. **Integrate audit into main CI**: Catch security issues before merge
+7. **Benchmark all packages**: Expand benchmarking coverage
+8. **Add caching to release jobs**: If they're slow
+
+### Low Priority
+
+9. **Optimize caching strategy**: Review and standardize across jobs
+10. **Add more granular labels**: Improve automatic labeling
+11. **Build examples in CI**: Ensure examples stay functional
+
+## Coverage Recommendations
+
+1. **Add documentation build verification**: `cargo doc --no-deps` with warnings as errors
+2. **Add examples build job**: Ensure all examples compile
+3. **Consider security scanning**: Integrate cargo-audit into main workflow
+4. **Add dependency review**: For new/changed dependencies
+
+## Correctness Recommendations
+
+1. **Fix YAML anchors**: Use proper syntax or remove anchors
+2. **Add job timeouts**: Prevent infinite runs
+3. **Verify MSRV**: Ensure 1.88 is correct or update to actual MSRV
+4. **Document nightly requirements**: Clarify why certain jobs need nightly
+
+## Best Practices Observations
+
+### What's Working Well
+
+- Proper use of caching with sccache and rust-cache
+- Good matrix testing across platforms and versions
+- Comprehensive testing including miri, machete, minimal-versions
+- Security-focused with audit and deny checks
+- Modern tooling with nextest and llvm-cov
+- Proper fork handling in benchmarking
+- Good use of concurrency controls
+
+### What Could Be Better
+
+- Some jobs are quite heavy and could be optimized for PR workflows
+- Documentation could be better (inline comments in workflows)
+- Some inconsistencies in configuration (anchors, caching)
+- Could benefit from more modular/reusable actions
+
+## Estimated Time Savings
+
+By implementing the high-priority recommendations:
+- **Coverage job optimization**: Save ~60 minutes per PR (if made non-blocking)
+- **Matrix reduction on PRs**: Save ~30-40 minutes per PR (by reducing to essential checks)
+- **Improved caching**: Save ~5-10 minutes per job
+- **Total potential savings**: 1-2 hours per PR, which on a busy repository could mean significant cost and time savings
+
+## Conclusion
+
+Overall, the GitHub Actions setup is **very comprehensive and well-thought-out**. The workflows demonstrate:
+- Strong security awareness
+- Thorough testing practices
+- Modern Rust tooling adoption
+- Good CI/CD patterns
+
+The main opportunities for improvement are in:
+1. **Performance optimization** for PR workflows (making some checks optional/scheduled)
+2. **Fixing minor correctness issues** (YAML anchors, timeouts)
+3. **Expanding coverage** (docs, examples)
+
+The workflows are production-ready but could benefit from the optimizations listed above, especially for improving PR turnaround time and reducing CI costs.