Expected Behavior
Open dapr fastapi ext doc, copy paste example and make it work
Actual Behavior
Pydantic refuses example:
== APP == Traceback (most recent call last):
== APP == File "/home/jse/python-sdk/test.py", line 9, in <module>
== APP == class User(BaseModel):
== APP == File "/home/jse/python-sdk/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_model_construction.py", line 113, in __new__
== APP == private_attributes = inspect_namespace(
== APP == File "/home/jse/python-sdk/venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_model_construction.py", line 450, in inspect_namespace
== APP == raise PydanticUserError(
== APP == pydantic.errors.PydanticUserError: A non-annotated attribute was detected: `name = 'Jane Doe'`. All model fields require a type annotation; if `name` is not meant to be a field, you may be able to resolve this error by annotating it as a `ClassVar` or updating `model_config['ignored_types']`.
== APP ==
== APP == For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.10/u/model-field-missing-annotation
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Copy paste example and run
Release Note
Release note not applicable I think.
Expected Behavior
Open dapr fastapi ext doc, copy paste example and make it work
Actual Behavior
Pydantic refuses example:
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Copy paste example and run
Release Note
Release note not applicable I think.