ruptures got 2 out of 3 change points correct

[munchine]

Great tool but it seems that ruptures can correctly detect 2 out of 3 correctly. Am I doing something wrong? I’ve attached the data.
Rupture_Test_Data1.xlsx

It’s a log log so here’s my code snippet
`def detect_and_plot(x, y, title):
# Change point detection on log-transformed data
xy = np.column_stack((x, y))
algo = rpt.Pelt(model="rbf").fit(xy)
result = algo.predict(pen=10)

x_log = np.log(data_cleaned['tD (x)'].to_numpy())
y_log = np.log(data_cleaned['pDp (y)'].to_numpy())
`
Here’s the plot and the 3rd change point, should occur around 14, but it is occurring around 19. Any guidance will be much appreciated.

[deepcharles]

Hi, replace algo = rpt.Pelt(model="rbf").fit(xy) by algo = rpt.Pelt(model="rbf", jump=1).fit(xy).

By default, Pelt only looks for change-points that are multiple of 5 (bad default I know).

Hope this helps