Skip to content

TESTING: Inadequate Test Coverage #31

@devfire

Description

@devfire

Severity: HIGH

Issue

The project has only ONE test for a cryptographic messaging system:

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    #[test]
    fn test_parse_composite_key() { ... }
}

This is completely inadequate for a security-critical application.

Missing Test Categories

Unit Tests:

  • Identity actor key loading
  • OpenMLS actor operations
  • State actor message handling
  • Network configuration validation
  • Error handling paths
  • Protobuf serialization/deserialization

Integration Tests:

  • Actor communication
  • Group creation and joining
  • Message encryption/decryption
  • Key package exchange
  • Multi-user scenarios

Property Tests:

  • Message ordering invariants
  • State consistency
  • Cryptographic properties

Security Tests:

  • Replay attack resistance
  • Key isolation
  • Authentication bypass attempts
  • Malformed message handling

Performance Tests:

  • Message throughput
  • Memory usage under load
  • Concurrent user handling

Why This Matters

Without comprehensive tests:

  • Cannot refactor safely
  • Security issues undetected
  • Regressions introduced easily
  • Hard to verify correctness
  • Not production-ready

Recommended Test Framework

[dev-dependencies]
proptest = "1.0"        # Property testing
criterion = "0.5"       # Benchmarking
mockall = "0.12"        # Mocking
tokio-test = "0.4"      # Async testing

Example Test Structure

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    mod identity_actor {
        #[test]
        fn test_load_valid_ssh_key() { ... }
        
        #[test]
        fn test_load_encrypted_ssh_key() { ... }
        
        #[test]
        fn test_reject_invalid_key_format() { ... }
    }
    
    mod state_actor {
        #[tokio::test]
        async fn test_create_group() { ... }
        
        #[tokio::test]
        async fn test_encrypt_decrypt_roundtrip() { ... }
    }
}

Test Coverage Goals

  • 70%+ line coverage
  • 100% coverage of error paths
  • All public APIs tested
  • Integration test for each user story

Labels

testing, technical-debt, quality

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions