Skip to content

Commit a6fd92f

Browse files
dfa1claude
andcommitted
docs(readme): refresh top-N numbers at 80M rows for consistency
Top-N (first 10/100 rows) re-measured at the same 80M-row OHLC file used by the full-scan table. File size affects open + footer scan overhead, so numbers differ from the 10M run: - top-10: Java 2,701 vs JNI 550 ops/s → 4.9x - top-100: Java 2,697 vs JNI 573 ops/s → 4.7x Both tables now reference the same fixture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 parent c00fdf7 commit a6fd92f

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ ops/s = complete file scans per second; higher is better.
2626

2727
| N rows | Java (ops/s) | JNI/Rust (ops/s) | Speedup |
2828
|--------|-------------|-----------------|---------|
29-
| 10 | 5,739 | 1,618 | **3.5×** |
30-
| 100 | 5,787 | 1,660 | **3.5×** |
29+
| 10 | 2,701 | 550 | **4.9×** |
30+
| 100 | 2,697 | 573 | **4.7×** |
3131

3232
Measured 2026-06-16, commit `74ec207b`. See [docs/explanation.md](docs/explanation.md#benchmarks) for full tables and methodology.
3333

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)