Objective
Deliver a direct, evidence-based recommendation to Corporate decision-makers about whether and how to adopt on-device AI coding.
What This Outcome Produces
ASSESSMENT.md (second section): Corporate adoption recommendation with clear yes/no/conditional recommendation, rationale grounded in evidence, hardware implications, risk factors, and next steps.
How It Builds
Synthesized at Week 4 closure (July 17) from the Evidence Synthesis (Outcome 5) and all completed outcomes. Draft a clear recommendation written for Corporate audience.
- Using Outcome 5 synthesis, draft a clear recommendation
- Cover: recommendation (yes/no/conditional), rationale grounded in evidence, hardware implications, risk factors, next steps
- Write for Corporate audience (SMEs, managers, procurement) — not technical detail
- Get feedback from at least 2 other participants via PR review
- Finalize and merge
Complete When
- Recommendation is clear and actionable
- Rationale explicitly tied to evidence from Outcomes 1–5
- At least 2 participants have reviewed and approved
- Written for Corporate decision-makers
- Section marked ✅ when complete
Timeline
Active: Week 4 (synthesized at closure session, ~July 17)
Due: July 24, 2026 (end of Week 4)
Resources
Objective
Deliver a direct, evidence-based recommendation to Corporate decision-makers about whether and how to adopt on-device AI coding.
What This Outcome Produces
ASSESSMENT.md (second section): Corporate adoption recommendation with clear yes/no/conditional recommendation, rationale grounded in evidence, hardware implications, risk factors, and next steps.
How It Builds
Synthesized at Week 4 closure (July 17) from the Evidence Synthesis (Outcome 5) and all completed outcomes. Draft a clear recommendation written for Corporate audience.
Complete When
Timeline
Active: Week 4 (synthesized at closure session, ~July 17)
Due: July 24, 2026 (end of Week 4)
Resources