skill 运行结果不如我所想的好用

[dustPyrotechnic]

发现在装载后，对于算命的部分还是不够多和真实详细，这让要求材料的语句变得非常出戏

[github-actions]

Agent cycle round 1/5 finished with status complete.

The SKILL.md and README.md changes directly address Issue #1's complaint that the fortune-telling content was insufficiently detailed and authentic, making the material request feel jarring. New 互卦 (mutual hexagram) and 体用 (body/function) sections with 生克 relationship guidance enrich the Mei-Hua divination frame. The short conclusion expanded from 1-2 to 2-3 sentences, the old material-request length constraint was removed and replaced with narrative-flow guidance, length limits increased (200-350 / 300-500), and all four examples were updated with 互卦/体用/六爻审之/依卦象所缺 framing. The material request now reads as the natural concluding prescription rather than an abrupt non-sequitur. Only 2 files modified (+63/-26 in SKILL.md, +7/-2 in README.md). Old constraints and stale phrases are fully removed. Verifier reported pass with all acceptance checks met.

Tests:

• grep '互卦与体用' SKILL.md: section at line 100 with 4 生克 relationship types
• grep 'two to three sentences' SKILL.md: confirmed at line 123; 'one or two' fully removed
• grep 'must not exceed the length of the short conclusion' SKILL.md: 0 matches — old constraint removed
• grep '依卦象所缺，请补' SKILL.md: 6 occurrences (template + 4 examples + allowed phrase); zero standalone '请补：'
• grep '互卦得' SKILL.md: 6 occurrences; '体卦为': 7 occurrences; '六爻审之': 6 occurrences — all enriched
• grep 'GitHub-bot style: 200–350' SKILL.md: line 219 confirmed; 'Normal short comment: 300–500': line 220 confirmed
• grep 'expanded divination content' SKILL.md: Solution Prohibition guardrail at line 240
• Forbidden phrase check: all 7 matches confined to Forbidden Phrases listing section (lines 394-400); none in new content
• Hidden causation language check: no phrases like 'root cause', 'technical issue', 'actual cause' introduced in new content
• git diff --stat: only README.md (+7/-2) and SKILL.md (+63/-26) modified

Findings:

• low: Example 4 line 338 has a Unicode quotation mark inconsistency — the opening quote before '突然不行' is U+201D (RIGHT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK) instead of U+201C (LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK), creating a mismatched pair with the surrounding Chinese quotation marks. Cosmetic only; does not affect readability or function.
• info: No executable test suite exists in the repository; all verification is static content review. AI model behavior with the enriched 互卦/体用 concepts cannot be validated in this pipeline environment (risk acknowledged by analyst, implementer, and verifier).
• info: Template at line 206 omits 初爻 and 二爻 from the 六爻审之 line, while Example 3 includes them. This is intentional — the template shows the most common missing yaos (3-6) as a baseline, and examples demonstrate that 初爻/二爻 are reviewed when relevant evidence categories are absent. Not a defect.

Next step: Ship this change. The only remaining concern — AI model behavior with enriched 互卦/体用 concepts — can only be validated in a live runtime, not in this pipeline environment. Monitor initial usage for over-elaboration or bloat.

Pull request: #3
Run: https://github.com/dustPyrotechnic/cyber-divination-debug/actions/runs/27492771974