diff --git a/src/hocon_scanner.xrl b/src/hocon_scanner.xrl
index 9510bca..f52d173 100644
--- a/src/hocon_scanner.xrl
+++ b/src/hocon_scanner.xrl
@@ -50,11 +50,14 @@ Float               = {Integer}?{Fraction}|{Integer}{Fraction}{Exponent}
 
 %% String
 Hex                 = [0-9A-Fa-f]
-Escape              = ["\\bfnrt]
+EscapeNoQuote       = [\\bfnrt]
+Escape              = "|{EscapeNoQuote}
 UnicodeEscape       = u{Hex}{Hex}{Hex}{Hex}
 Char                = ([^\"{LineFeed}]|\\{Escape}|\\{UnicodeEscape})
 String              = "{Char}*"
-MultilineChar       = ([^"]|"[^"]|""[^"]|\\{Escape}|\\{UnicodeEscape})
+%% Special handling for trailing quote: if we don't assert it's not followed by two other
+%% quotes, `{Escape}` would "eat" one of the quotes in the triple quote...
+MultilineChar       = ([^"]|"[^"]|""[^"]|\\{EscapeNoQuote}|\\{UnicodeEscape})
 MultilineString     = """{MultilineChar}*"""
 
 %% Bytesize and Duration
diff --git a/test/hocon_pp_tests.erl b/test/hocon_pp_tests.erl
index 8e66324..4042b7d 100644
--- a/test/hocon_pp_tests.erl
+++ b/test/hocon_pp_tests.erl
@@ -334,6 +334,31 @@ no_triple_quote_string_when_oneliner_test_() ->
         ?_assertEqual([<<"root {a = \"a\\nb\"}">>], hocon_pp:do(Value, #{newline => <<>>}))
     ].
 
+%% Tests that having an one liner with characters that should be escaped do not interfere
+%% badly with other values which are triple quoted with indentation.
+%%
+%% At the time of writing, the below example does not trigger the original bug if only
+%% root2 is present and expected.  Also, if the trailing backslash in root1 is removed, it
+%% also does not trigger the bug.
+triple_quote_string_ending_in_backslash_test() ->
+    Raw = #{
+        <<"root1">> => #{<<"x">> => <<"\t\"\\\"\\t\\">>},
+        <<"root2">> => #{<<"x">> => <<"select \n from\n \"hello\" ">>}
+    },
+    Sc = #{
+        roots => [root1, root2],
+        fields => #{
+            root1 => [{"x", hoconsc:mk(binary())}],
+            root2 => [{"x", hoconsc:mk(binary())}]
+        }
+    },
+    %% Parses fine.
+    Raw = hocon_tconf:check_plain(Sc, Raw, #{}),
+    PP = hocon_pp:do(Raw, #{}),
+    %% Roundtrip: must read back the same thing.
+    ?assertEqual({ok, Raw}, hocon:binary(PP)),
+    ok.
+
 crlf_multiline_test_() ->
     Value = #{<<"root">> => #{<<"x">> => <<"\r\n\r\na\r\nb\n">>}},
     CRLF = <<"\r\n">>,