You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reformulate forcing in theta instead of temperature and/or in terms of height instead of pressure - yes! See Tom's branch.
Reduce reference_reset_time - seems to help
Try capping dtheta - doesn't work
Scale dtheta by a factor - works with 0.01 for example (but the resulting circulation is not quite right)
Scale dtheta by a factor and increment it gradually - doesn't work
Try filtering using the cartesian wind components - makes the model stable but the jet is retrograde. Trying with a scaling factor, doesn't really help
Try implicit timestepping (Backward Euler) for the temperature increment
Try making sure we are consistent with our assumptions about which of density or exner is kept constant, which would mean either: (a) assuming that density is constant, so that we include the d(exner)/dt term in calculating the increment to theta, or (b) assuming that exner is constant, so that we then increment density
Try extending SHJ to lower/higher pressures and stronger day-night gradient
reference_reset_time- seems to helpTry cappingdtheta- doesn't workScaledthetaby a factor - works with 0.01 for example (but the resulting circulation is not quite right)Scaledthetaby a factor and increment it gradually - doesn't workTry filtering using the cartesian wind components - makes the model stable but the jet is retrograde. Trying with a scaling factor, doesn't really helpTry Rayleigh damping - nopeTry higher mesh resolutionsDoesn't seem to helpTry different vertical resolutionsdittoTry stretched meshdittoRelated: #28
LFRic-Apps ticket: https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/lfric_apps/ticket/690