Skip to content

What is the performance of SteepGS when the number of primitives is close to original 3DGS? #5

@kaikai23

Description

@kaikai23

Congratulations on the great work and thanks for sharing it with the community!

I have a question regarding Table 1 of the paper. Specifically, I’m curious about the performance of SteepGS when the number of primitives is close to that of the original 3DGS—for example, around 3.339M on the Mip-NeRF 360 dataset. Could you share how SteepGS performs under such a setting?

Thank you in advance!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions