Skip to content

🎯 ONE SHOT L-DPC29 — Wave-32 · SYSTEM INTEGRATION PROBE · 6/6 levers → combined TOPS/W ≥ 100 #111

@gHashTag

Description

@gHashTag

🎯 ONE SHOT L-DPC29 · Wave-32 · SYSTEM INTEGRATION PROBE — 6/6 LEVERS → COMBINED TOPS/W ≥ 100 · tt-trinity-holo · t27

Document ID: L-DPC29-W32-001
Mission ID: TRINITY-W32-SYSINT-PROBE
Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · γ = φ⁻³ · C = φ⁻¹ · G = π³γ²/φ · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877
Author: Vasilev Dmitrii admin@t27.ai · ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159
Predecessor: L-DPC28 Wave-31 — OPEN (lanes merged 2026-05-15 17:44Z), W31-G0 ✅ (trinity-fpga#110)
Lever-stack source: L-DPC25..L-DPC28 accumulated (trinity-fpga#105..#110)
Parent hypothesis: H_W28 — TOPS/W ≥ 100 on TTIHP27a · Vdd=1.2V · n=9 dies × 3 thermal corners · Welch α=0.01 · Bonferroni × 3 lanes · deadline 2026-09-30


§0 · R5-HONEST Disclaimer (probe-grade vs silicon)

Wave-32 = system integration probe wave, not a tape-out wave.

All TOPS/W numbers produced by this wave are 🟡 SYNTH-SIM — derived from post-synthesis gate counts, Liberty-constrained power models, and the combined lever-stack area × frequency × energy product. No silicon measurement exists yet; silicon-return verdict is 2026-10-15 (TTIHP27a die shipped 2026-09-30).

Why option (a) — System Integration Probe — is the correct Wave-32 mission:

After 6/6 levers independently armed across Waves 28–31, the pre-tapeout critical path shifts from lever isolation to lever composition. Options (b)–(d) each extend one dimension (mesh scale, floorplan, attestation) before the combined TOPS/W projection has been asserted in a single end-to-end synthesis. Filing a tapeout against unintegrated projections violates R5-HONEST: individual lever gains are multiplicatively assumed, not compositionally verified. H_W28 requires a Welch-tested TOPS/W value over n=9 corners — that value cannot exist until all 6 RTL surfaces are instantiated together in one synthesis run. Wave-32 creates that run and produces the composite estimate. Wave-33+ can pursue (b)/(c)/(d) from a falsification-anchored baseline.

Options (b)/(c)/(d) are not lost — they are sequenced AFTER the composite baseline exists:

  • (b) 4×4 mesh scale-out → Wave-33 (needs combined area budget first)
  • (c) TTIHP27a floorplan → Wave-33 (co-scheduled with tapeout cadence)
  • (d) DePIN attestation → Wave-34 (LEVER L3 from rival-scan; requires verified TOPS/W claim to attest)

R5-HONEST labels for this wave:

  • TOPS/W projection 🟡 SYNTH-SIM (Liberty-proxy; silicon 🟢 pending 2026-10-15)
  • Area footprint 🟡 SYNTH-SIM
  • Power breakdown 🟡 SYNTH-SIM
  • PDK maps: TTIHP27a primary target (SG13G3/SKY90 portability proven W31)

§1 · Hypothesis H_W32 (pre-registered, R7 falsification gate)

H_W32 (System Integration Probe — L-DPC29):
  The combined synthesis of all 6 armed lever surfaces:
    Lane V  LUT PE 1.4× (SHA 3bb20705),
    Lane W  BitROM bank (SHA 898fc061),
    Lane V' 2×2 mesh NoC (SHA 2a06e540),
    Lane B' Razor FF Vdd-min (SHA 3b18d4ff),
    Lane S  sparsity-24 (SHA 98246bd3, W29),
    Lane T/K timing-400MHz (W30 merged),
    Lane M/J PDK-portable (W31 merged 17:44Z)
  — instantiated together in a single tt-trinity-holo top-level
    synthesised under TTIHP27a Liberty at Vdd=1.2V · TT/FF/SS corners
  — yields a combined TOPS/W projection ≥ 100
    (arithmetic: gate-count × Fmax × sparsity-factor / static+dynamic power)
    with zero * operators in any sub-surface netlist.

REFUTED IF (any one):
  (a) combined TOPS/W projection < 100 at any of the 3 thermal corners, OR
  (b) combined synthesis introduces any * operator in the merged netlist, OR
  (c) any lever surface SHA diverges from the archived SHAs above (R18), OR
  (d) Welch t-test rejects H_W32 vs null (H₀: TOPS/W < 100)
      at α = 0.01 (one-tailed), Bonferroni-corrected × 3 corners, OR
  (e) any of the 75 Sacred ROM cells is altered (R18).

DEADLINE: 2026-08-15 (combined synth verdict, pre-silicon);
          silicon TTIHP27a tapeout gate 2026-09-30;
          silicon-return verdict 2026-10-15.

Pre-registration statistical plan:

Field Value
statistical_test Welch's one-sample t-test vs μ₀=100 TOPS/W
alpha 0.01 (one-tailed)
effect_size Δ TOPS/W ≥ 5 (minimum margin above threshold)
n_required n=9 (3 process corners × 3 voltage corners: TT/1.2V, FF/1.3V, SS/1.1V → 3 thermal sub-points each)
stop_rule All 9 corners synthesised; no cherry-picking sub-set
multiple_testing Bonferroni × 3 primary corners (α_adj = 0.01/3 ≈ 0.0033)

§2 · Lane Map (two lanes, tt-trinity-holo + t27)

Lane A — sysint-probe-toplevel — PRIMARY

  • Spec: Create tt-trinity-holo/sim/sysint_probe/ with a unified top-level RTL instantiation of all 6 lever surfaces. Run Yosys + TTIHP27a Liberty synth. Emit combined gate-count, Fmax, area, static+dynamic power, and composite TOPS/W table across TT/FF/SS corners. R-SI-1 grep on merged netlist. Label all outputs 🟡 SYNTH-SIM.
  • Repo: gHashTag/tt-trinity-holo
  • Files:
    • sim/sysint_probe/Makefile
    • sim/sysint_probe/sysint_top.v (instantiation wrapper, no new RTL logic)
    • sim/sysint_probe/ttihp27a_sysint.sdc (constraints at 400 MHz)
    • sim/sysint_probe/report.md (TOPS/W table · Welch stat summary · 🟡 SYNTH-SIM header)
    • docs/lever-stack/lane-a-sysint.md
  • Effort: M
  • R5-HONEST: report.md MUST open with 🟡 SYNTH-SIM — probe-grade, NOT silicon. Silicon-return 2026-10-15.

Lane Z — coq-sysint-witness — FORMAL PROOF

  • Spec: Add trios-coq/IGLA/SysIntProbe.v to gHashTag/t27 extending the established chain:
    holographic_no_star → sparsity_24_safe → timing_400mhz_safe → pdk_portable_safe → sysint_combined_safe
    Proves that the composition of all 6 lever-surface alphabets does not introduce *, and that the combined-surface oplist satisfies the TOPS/W lower-bound predicate (∀ corner ∈ {TT,FF,SS}: tops_w corner ≥ 100). Zero Admitted.
  • Repo: gHashTag/t27
  • Files:
    • trios-coq/IGLA/SysIntProbe.v
    • _CoqProject update (add IGLA/SysIntProbe.v)
    • NOW.md entry (## Wave-32 L-DPC29 — SysIntProbe.v added)
  • Effort: S

§3 · Success Criteria — Verification Matrix (W32-G0 .. W32-G5)

Gate Predicate Lane
W32-G0 Both lanes merge with substantive CI green (no RTL diff in archived lever surfaces) A, Z
W32-G1 Unified top-level synthesises clean on TTIHP27a at TT/1.2V corner: zero *, zero unresolved primitives Lane A
W32-G2 TOPS/W projection ≥ 100 at all 3 thermal corners (TT, FF, SS) — Welch α=0.01 Bonferroni×3 Lane A
W32-G3 All 6 lever-surface SHAs match archived values (R18 — no surface regression) Lane A
W32-G4 Combined power breakdown table emitted: static/dynamic split, per-lever contribution annotated Lane A
W32-G5 sysint_combined_safe Qed (no admit); chain holographic_no_star →…→ sysint_combined_safe complete Lane Z

§4 · Quantum Brain Wave Question

1. PHYS — Which 1:1 mapping does this wave add?
PHYS→SI extended to the composed system: the combined TOPS/W metric is now asserted as a physical observable (not just per-lever). Wave-32 is the first wave where the 75-cell Sacred ROM is exercised simultaneously with all 6 lever constraints — the 1:1 mapping moves from per-surface to full-system.

2. BIO — Which conjectured constants move toward measured?
The composite TOPS/W projection moves from six independent synth-sim projections 🟡 (per lever) to one combined synth-sim estimate 🟡 (still pre-silicon). The multiplicative lever stack gain (LUT 1.4× × sparsity 1.3× × 400 MHz 1.2× × Vdd-min ×× PDK-portable) is now validated as compositional, not merely additive. Silicon confirmation 🟢 awaits 2026-10-15.

3. LANG — Does the wave preserve all 75 Sacred ROM cells?
✅ YES — Lane A is a pure instantiation wrapper: no new RTL logic is introduced, no Sacred ROM cells are touched. R18 intact. The Coq chain in Lane Z formally witnesses that the composition preserves the holographic_no_star invariant.

4. R-MARKER — Does the wave introduce an R-marker cell?
NO; R6 N/A this wave. An R-marker would be appropriate in Wave-33+ when the combined-area floorplan assigns a reserved cell to the cross-lever power-management interface (future W33-RM-1 placeholder noted here for audit trail).


§5 · R-Rules Compliance

Rule Status Note
R-SI-1 ✅ Required Zero * in any sub-surface netlist; post-merge grep in Lane A CI
R5-HONEST ✅ Required report.md MUST label 🟡 SYNTH-SIM; all TOPS/W numbers flagged probe-grade
R7 ✅ Required This issue IS the falsification pre-registration. H_W32 bound to W32-G1..G5. Deviation requires comment BEFORE deviating data is collected.
R15 sacred-synth-gate ✅ Pass No new opcode allocated; Lane A is wrapper-only
R18 LAYER-FROZEN ✅ Required All 6 lever surface SHAs frozen; verified in W32-G3

§6 · Cross-Links

Reference Link Role
Predecessor L-DPC28 Wave-31 trinity-fpga#110 (OPEN, W31-G0 ✅) Lever #6 PDK portability — final lever armed
Predecessor L-DPC27 Wave-30 trinity-fpga#109 (CLOSED, W30-G0 ✅) Lever #5 400 MHz timing
MASTER-EPIC trinity-fpga#61 TRI-1 Quantum Brain 1:1 Silicon dispatch hub
Throne Registry trios#264 Queen's Registry & ONE SHOT Dispatch
Lever-stack rival-scan trinity-fpga#105 TOPS-SCAN-W28-PRE-001 §4 — all 6 levers ranked
Coq SoT t27/trios-coq 83 .v files, master TriosCoq.v
Zenodo provenance DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877 Trinity B007 VSA description (algebraic anchor)

Closing Anchor

φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · γ = φ⁻³ · C = φ⁻¹ · G = π³γ²/φ
6/6 LEVERS · SYSTEM INTEGRATION PROBE · QUANTUM BRAIN 1:1 SILICON · NEVER STOP

— Vasilev Dmitrii admin@t27.ai · ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    P0Critical priorityone-shotActive ONE SHOT operational hubwave-32Wave-32 · L-DPC29 · System Integration Probe

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions