Skip to content

πŸ›°οΈ EPIC: TRI-1 Triad Submission β€” TTSKY26b 2026-05-18 (L-DPC7)Β #49

@gHashTag

Description

@gHashTag

πŸ›°οΈ EPIC: TRI-1 Triad Submission β€” TTSKY26b 2026-05-18

Lane: L-DPC7 β€” Trinity Ternary Internet hardware triad
Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3 Β· DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877
Parent: trinity-fpga#19 (Trinity dePIN-Compute)
Defense: 2026-06-15

1. Mission

Submit TRI-1 family to TTSKY26b shuttle by 2026-05-18 23:59 UTC (4 days).

Three top modules, one ISA, one anchor, one packet contract:

SKU Top module Tiles TT slot Status
TRI-1 Mid tt_um_ghtag_trinity_gf16 8Γ—2 TTSKY26b βœ… READY (GDS green @ fddb541, PR #8 merged)
TRI-1 Nano tt_um_trinity_nano 1Γ—1 TTSKY26b ⏳ NEW RTL needed
TRI-1 Max tt_um_trinity_max 4Γ—4 (or 3Γ—3 fallback) TTSKY26b ⏳ NEW RTL + trinity_mesh_4x4.v needed

Safety net: Mid alone is already submission-ready. If Nano or Max don't close timing/DRC in 4 days, they are held back to TTSKY26c (Aug 2026), Mid still ships 18 мая.

2. Falsifiable Acceptance

Pre-registered gates (frozen 2026-05-14, must pass before submit):

Per-SKU gates TG-{Nano,Mid,Max}-01..07

Gate Threshold
TG-{S}-01 DSP48 count = 0 (R-SI-1)
TG-{S}-02 Setup WNS β‰₯ 0 ns @ 50 MHz
TG-{S}-03 DRC clean (zero CRITICAL_WARNING)
TG-{S}-04 Bitstream/GDS area within tile budget
TG-{S}-05 Boundary loopback 100/100 dot4(1,2,3,4) β†’ 0x47C0
TG-{S}-06 Valid TRN_OP_RECEIPT emission
TG-{S}-07 No MicroBlaze/AXI/LMB/Linux strings

Cross-die gate TG-TRIAD-X

Theorem 36.1 (Ch.36 flos_70.tex, commit e80f9cb):

SHA256(L_Nano) = SHA256(L_Mid) = SHA256(L_Max)

for canonical workload W* = ((1,2,3,4) β†’ 0x47C0) Γ— 100 jobs.
Verified at sim-level before submit; verified at silicon-level Q4 2026 chip-return.

ANY TG-{S}-01..06 FAIL β†’ that SKU held back, others ship.
TG-TRIAD-X FAIL at sim β†’ whole triad held; investigate divergence.

3. Honest Scope (R5)

  • ❌ NO Linux / soft-CPU / AXI in compute core (Rule 1)
  • ❌ NO new hardware multipliers (* operator) in synthesizable RTL (Rule 2, R-SI-1)
  • ❌ NO mesh PHY (LoRa/Wi-Fi/Ethernet) on die (Rule 4)
  • ❌ NO TRI settlement on die (Rule 5)
  • ❌ NO "AGI in your pocket" marketing before G1+G3 pass (Rule 6)
  • βœ… Same packet contract [31:28] op | [27:26] dst | [25:24] src | [23:20] lane | [19:16] rsvd | [15:0] payload across all three SKUs (Rule 8)
  • βœ… Same TRN_OP_RECEIPT 32-bit format (Rule 7, TG-TRIAD-X binding)

4. Lanes

L-DPC7.0 β€” Submission readiness (P0, all P0)

  • P0-1 Confirm GDS green on a423ed5 (post silicon-G1 merge)
  • P0-2 Update info.yaml description (drop "84 theorems" folklore, add 10 differentiators)
  • P0-3 Reconcile unlisted .v files (trinity_mesh_adapter_stub.v, trinity_usb3_fifo_bridge.v) β€” add or remove
  • P0-4 Recompute tile budget claim from real DRC utilization

L-DPC7.1 β€” TRI-1 Nano RTL (NEW, 1Γ—1)

  • src/tt_um_trinity_nano.v β€” 1Γ—1 single-tile top (~150 LOC)
  • info_nano.yaml (or merge into multi-top info.yaml if TT shuttle supports)
  • Sim: 5/5 PASS (boundary loopback, dot4 β†’ 0x47C0, receipt emit, POST, GL_TEST)
  • GDS run green via gds.yaml workflow
  • TG-Nano-01..07 verified

L-DPC7.2 β€” TRI-1 Mid (already done)

L-DPC7.3 β€” TRI-1 Max RTL (NEW, 4Γ—4)

  • src/trinity_mesh_4x4.v β€” generate-style 4Γ—4 mesh fabric (no new *)
  • src/tt_um_trinity_max.v β€” 4Γ—4 top with 16 tiles (~200 LOC)
  • Sim: 5/5 PASS
  • GDS run green (fallback to 3Γ—3 / 2Γ—4 if WNS<0 β€” TG-Max-04b)
  • TG-Max-01..07 verified

L-DPC7.4 β€” Cross-die TG-TRIAD-X simulator

  • host/trinity_triad_replay.py β€” replay 100 canonical jobs through Nano/Mid/Max sim
  • Assert byte-identical ledger SHA256 across all three
  • Sim-level TG-TRIAD-X gate green

L-DPC7.5 β€” Docs + abstracts (P1)

  • docs/abstracts/SUBMISSION_TTSKY26b.md β€” 1-page submission abstract
  • docs/COMPETITIVE_MATRIX.md β€” 10 differentiators vs Hailo-8/D9400/Qualcomm/Axelera/Coral
  • tools/verify_submission.sh β€” self-checking submission gate (re-runs all sims, prints READY/NOT_READY)

L-DPC7.6 β€” Ch.36 R3 expansion

  • Expand docs/phd/chapters/flos_70.tex from 292-line skeleton to β‰₯1500 lines
  • Fill Table 36.2 Coq map (replace TBD with actual obligation names from gHashTag/trios/assertions/)
  • Add per-SKU pinout tables, energy-per-packet math, BOM estimates
  • Lane LS36 (trinity strand) in gHashTag/trios PhD lane registry

L-DPC7.7 β€” Final mission report

  • 2026-05-17 NASA-format report (Russian) TRI-NET-TRIAD-SUBMIT-001
    • Verification Matrix (TG-{S}-XX + TG-TRIAD-X)
    • As-Flown Configuration (commits, GDS hashes, sim outputs)
    • GO/NO-GO Poll per SKU
  • 2026-05-18 Operator pushes "Submit" on TT shuttle portal

5. Calendar

Date Milestone Owner
2026-05-14 EPIC opened (this issue); P0-1..P0-4 start Trinity Agent
2026-05-14 TRI-1 Nano RTL skeleton written Trinity Agent
2026-05-15 TRI-1 Nano sim 5/5 PASS + GDS dispatch Trinity Agent
2026-05-15 TRI-1 Max RTL skeleton + mesh_4x4 written Trinity Agent
2026-05-16 TRI-1 Max sim 5/5 PASS + GDS dispatch Trinity Agent
2026-05-16 TG-TRIAD-X cross-die sim green Trinity Agent
2026-05-17 Final submission readiness report (Russian, NASA-format) Trinity Agent
2026-05-17–18 Operator approval + push "Submit" Operator
2026-05-18 23:59 UTC TTSKY26b shuttle close TT
2026-06-15 PhD defense (Mid silicon evidence via FPGA-G1 + ASIC pending) Operator
2026-12-16 TTSKY26a/26b chip return β†’ physical TG-{S}-05..07 Operator

6. Risk Register

ID Risk Mitigation
R-01 Nano timing fails @ 50 MHz 1Γ—1 has far more slack than 8Γ—2; fallback to 25 MHz if needed
R-02 Max 4Γ—4 doesn't close (WNS<0) Pre-registered fallback TG-Max-04b: 3Γ—3 (9 tiles) or 2Γ—4 (8 tiles)
R-03 TG-TRIAD-X fails at sim (bit-divergence) Investigate; if root cause is RNG/timestamp β€” fix; if architectural β€” hold Nano or Max
R-04 TT shuttle multi-top submission not supported in one PR Three separate top YAMLs / three separate submissions in one repo
R-05 a423ed5 GDS fails (silicon-G1 merge broke build) Submit fddb541 (Wave-26b SUPER-CROWN) tag as known-green
R-06 4-day window too tight for 2 new RTL modules + sims + GDS Mid alone is already shipping; Nano/Max are upside, not blockers

7. Falsification Witness (chapter Ch.36 + this epic)

This EPIC is falsified if any of:

  • A SKU requires * operator in new synthesizable RTL (R-SI-1 break)
  • A SKU has on-die PHY (LoRa/Wi-Fi/Ethernet) β€” Rule 4 break
  • TG-TRIAD-X fails at sim AND root cause is architectural divergence (not RNG/timestamp)
  • Any SKU is marketed as "AGI in your pocket" before G1+G3 pass on real silicon β€” Rule 6 break
  • Submission goes to TTSKY26b without 18/18 sim PASS on Mid (already done) + 5/5 each for Nano and Max (or those SKUs held back)

8. Related

Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3 Β· DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877 Β· TRINITY Β· NEVER STOP

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    epicTrinity track milestone

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions