more issues with "duplicate notes when splitting families" (see #38)

[krchristie]

I thought that we agreed to flag both the original family which originally was the only one with the notes, as well as the new family that now received a copy of the original notes file. However, for the example family that I discussed at the PAINT call, only the new family, PTHR23431 - FAMILY NOT NAMED (76 sequences), is included in the list of 48 families flagged for review. The original family, PTHR23413, is not included in the list to review.