diff --git a/advisories/unreviewed/2026/04/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq.json b/advisories/unreviewed/2026/04/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq.json
index 5ec9345d1ab10..82fe6b92b6665 100644
--- a/advisories/unreviewed/2026/04/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq.json
+++ b/advisories/unreviewed/2026/04/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq/GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq.json
@@ -1,19 +1,37 @@
 {
   "schema_version": "1.4.0",
   "id": "GHSA-6337-2587-f2jq",
-  "modified": "2026-04-20T18:31:45Z",
+  "modified": "2026-04-20T18:32:51Z",
   "published": "2026-04-18T09:30:20Z",
   "aliases": [
     "CVE-2026-30898"
   ],
-  "details": "An example of BashOperator in Airflow documentation suggested a way of passing dag_run.conf in the way that could cause unsanitized user input to be used to escalate privileges of UI user to allow execute code on worker. Users should review if any of their own DAGs have adopted this incorrect advice.",
+  "summary": "Remote Code Execution via insecure dag execution",
+  "details": "An example of BashOperator in Airflow documentation suggested a way of passing dag_run.conf in the way that could cause unsanitized user input to be used to escalate privileges of UI user to allow execute code on worker. Users should review if any of their own DAGs have adopted this incorrect advice.\n\nCredit: Peyton Kennedy (p80n-sec) from Endor Labs",
   "severity": [
     {
       "type": "CVSS_V3",
       "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"
     }
   ],
-  "affected": [],
+  "affected": [
+    {
+      "package": {
+        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
+        "name": "apache-airflow"
+      },
+      "ranges": [
+        {
+          "type": "ECOSYSTEM",
+          "events": [
+            {
+              "introduced": "0"
+            }
+          ]
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
   "references": [
     {
       "type": "ADVISORY",