In section 2 and appendix A of the document, the subject terms are not conforming to the VOResource specification, which states that the terms should come from the IVOA UAT vocabulary.
In section 2:
<subject>Virtual observatory</subject>
<subject>Standards</subject>
<subject>HiPS</subject>
In appendix A:
<subject> software standard </subject>
<subject> virtual observatory </subject>
Definition is VOResource for the element: The content of subject SHOULD be the fragment identifier of the URI of a concept in the IVOA UAT (http://www.ivoa.net/rdf/uat/), that is, a string like "virtual-observatories".
Are we ok with this nonconformity?
In section 2 and appendix A of the document, the subject terms are not conforming to the VOResource specification, which states that the terms should come from the IVOA UAT vocabulary.
In section 2:
In appendix A:
Definition is VOResource for the element: The content of subject SHOULD be the fragment identifier of the URI of a concept in the IVOA UAT (http://www.ivoa.net/rdf/uat/), that is, a string like "virtual-observatories".
Are we ok with this nonconformity?