At the moment the model is fully normalised so that the references to tables have a multi value key of the table name and schema name - however, in most usages in Registry and TAP the table name is expected to be the primary key that is directly expressed as the concatenation of the schema name and the table name part. The model should be altered to express this more directly
At the moment the model is fully normalised so that the references to tables have a multi value key of the table name and schema name - however, in most usages in Registry and TAP the table name is expected to be the primary key that is directly expressed as the concatenation of the schema name and the table name part. The model should be altered to express this more directly