Sometimes the sentence recognition routine has split things in a difficult place. See 2004-46-NATURE.txt:218
For the native data and SeMet data, reflections with fractional partialities of 0.7 or more and 0.5, respectively, were scaled to full intensity and incorporated into the data set as fully recorded reflections (program POST: D.I.S.
and J.M.D., unpublished program).
In this case, and thinking about this as training data, I just put a mention on both.
For the native data and SeMet data, reflections with fractional partialities of 0.7 or more and 0.5, respectively, were scaled to full intensity and incorporated into the data set as fully recorded reflections (program POST: D.I.S.
and J.M.D., unpublished program).
Sometimes the sentence recognition routine has split things in a difficult place. See 2004-46-NATURE.txt:218
For the native data and SeMet data, reflections with fractional partialities of 0.7 or more and 0.5, respectively, were scaled to full intensity and incorporated into the data set as fully recorded reflections (program POST: D.I.S.
and J.M.D., unpublished program).
In this case, and thinking about this as training data, I just put a mention on both.
For the native data and SeMet data, reflections with fractional partialities of 0.7 or more and 0.5, respectively, were scaled to full intensity and incorporated into the data set as fully recorded reflections (program POST: D.I.S.
and J.M.D., unpublished program).