This project is to implement a Queue using two Stacks.
Features:
- Stack
- Methods:
- push
- pop
- is empty
- Methods:
It raises custom error messages and tests to prove the functionality.
Resources:
- Code Fellows stacks and queues article
- Adam's demo in Class 10
- JB's demo in Class 11
- ChatGPT
The Big O analysis of the PseudoQueue class, which uses two stacks to implement queue operations, can be considered for both time and space complexity:
Time Complexity
-
Enqueue Operation (
enqueue):- This operation involves a single
pushtostack1, which is an O(1) operation as it simply adds an element to the end of the list.
- This operation involves a single
-
Dequeue Operation (
dequeue):- This operation is more complex. If
stack2is empty, all elements fromstack1are moved tostack2. This operation is O(n) where n is the number of elements instack1, as each element requires one pop and one push operation. - However, each element is moved like this only once. After an element has been moved to
stack2, it stays there until it is dequeued. So, while a singledequeueoperation can be O(n) in the worst case (whenstack2is empty), the average or amortized time complexity fordequeueis O(1). This is because each element is moved fromstack1tostack2only once over the course of manydequeueoperations.
- This operation is more complex. If
Space Complexity
- The space complexity for the
PseudoQueueis O(n), where n is the number of elements in the queue. This is because all queue elements must be stored in eitherstack1orstack2. The space required grows linearly with the number of elements enqueued.
Summary
- Enqueue: O(1) time complexity.
- Dequeue: O(1) amortized time complexity, but can be O(n) in the worst case for a single operation.
- Space Complexity: O(n) for both enqueue and dequeue operations.
This analysis reflects the trade-off made by using two stacks to implement queue functionality, especially in the dequeue operation, where the amortized time complexity is favorable, but individual operations can occasionally be costlier.
Source: ChatGPT
