diff --git a/.superpowers/brainstorm/44142-1782645277/content/thinking-trail-preview.html b/.superpowers/brainstorm/44142-1782645277/content/thinking-trail-preview.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c1024b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/.superpowers/brainstorm/44142-1782645277/content/thinking-trail-preview.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + +
Click the direction that feels best. I recommend A for the branch: it proves the feature without adding overlay mechanics.
+ +Shows a small live trail near the frontier line, capped so long reasoning does not dominate the thread.
+Most transparent, but it can quickly bury tool calls and answers when the model reasons for a while.
+Keeps the thread clean, but needs new focus, scrolling, dismissal, and keyboard handling.
+Does option A feel useful enough, or does even the capped inline trail still add too much noise? If A feels close, the next design choice is whether finished turns keep only the summary line or keep a collapsed trail marker in history.
+Same turn rendered three ways so we can feel the trade-off between transparency and noise. Click the one you like; I lean toward A for the feature branch because it ships the trail without inventing an overlay system.
+ +A compact, capped trail that lives in the thread but never floods it.
+Maximum transparency, but long reasoning pushes answers down the pane.
+Cleanest thread, but needs new focus, scroll & dismissal handling.
+Does the capped trail in A feel useful, or is even two lines of reasoning too much noise for a normal turn?
+If A is close, the next decision is what a finished turn keeps: just the ✓ done · reasoning summary, or a collapsed trail you can reopen later in history.
+